Peter Kegel1, Stephan Letzel, Bernd Rossbach. 1. University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Institute of Occupational, Social, and Environmental Medicine, Mainz, Germany.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To analyse differences in uptake of the insecticide permethrin in wearers of non-impregnated and permethrin impregnated battle dress uniforms (BDU) in Afghanistan and Germany. METHODS: In two separate studies, in April 2003-January 2004 (study I, n=549) and in February-April 2005 (study II, n=195), healthy female and male members of the German Federal Armed Forces were equipped with permethrin impregnated BDU (two sub-cohorts in Germany and one in Afghanistan) while members equipped with non-impregnated uniforms served as a control group. Human biomonitoring was conducted before, during and after wearing the uniforms by measuring permethrin metabolites in urine samples via GC-MS. RESULTS: Subjects of the Afghan and German control groups had permethrin levels in the range of the German general population. In contrast, subjects wearing impregnated BDU had about 200-fold higher exposure levels. Within this group, subjects located in Afghanistan and smokers had significantly higher exposure levels. Internal exposure decreased with increasing duration of use of impregnated BDU. CONCLUSIONS: There is no evidence for a higher background permethrin contamination in military bases located in Afghanistan compared to Germany. Daily use of permethrin impregnated BDU is associated with significantly higher permethrin uptake compared to the general population. Hand-mouth contact by smoking can increase uptake which also seems to be influenced by the duration of use of impregnated BDU.
OBJECTIVES: To analyse differences in uptake of the insecticide permethrin in wearers of non-impregnated and permethrin impregnated battle dress uniforms (BDU) in Afghanistan and Germany. METHODS: In two separate studies, in April 2003-January 2004 (study I, n=549) and in February-April 2005 (study II, n=195), healthy female and male members of the German Federal Armed Forces were equipped with permethrin impregnated BDU (two sub-cohorts in Germany and one in Afghanistan) while members equipped with non-impregnated uniforms served as a control group. Human biomonitoring was conducted before, during and after wearing the uniforms by measuring permethrin metabolites in urine samples via GC-MS. RESULTS: Subjects of the Afghan and German control groups had permethrin levels in the range of the German general population. In contrast, subjects wearing impregnated BDU had about 200-fold higher exposure levels. Within this group, subjects located in Afghanistan and smokers had significantly higher exposure levels. Internal exposure decreased with increasing duration of use of impregnated BDU. CONCLUSIONS: There is no evidence for a higher background permethrin contamination in military bases located in Afghanistan compared to Germany. Daily use of permethrin impregnated BDU is associated with significantly higher permethrin uptake compared to the general population. Hand-mouth contact by smoking can increase uptake which also seems to be influenced by the duration of use of impregnated BDU.
Entities:
Keywords:
Battle Dress Uniforms; Permethrin; health effects; soldiers
Authors: Susan P Proctor; Alexis L Maule; Kristin J Heaton; Bruce S Cadarette; Katelyn I Guerriere; Caitlin C Haven; Kathryn M Taylor; Matthew M Scarpaci; Maria Ospina; Antonia M Calafat Journal: J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol Date: 2019-02-06 Impact factor: 5.563
Authors: Alexis L Maule; Kristin J Heaton; Bruce Cadarette; Kathryn M Taylor; Katelyn I Guerriere; Caitlin C Haven; Matthew M Scarpaci; Robert W Kenefick; Maria Ospina; Antonia M Calafat; Susan P Proctor Journal: Am J Trop Med Hyg Date: 2020-06 Impact factor: 2.345
Authors: Susan P Proctor; Matthew M Scarpaci; Alexis L Maule; Kristin J Heaton; Kathryn Taylor; Caitlin C Haven; Jennifer Rood; Maria Ospina; Antonia M Calafat Journal: Toxicol Lett Date: 2018-10-05 Impact factor: 4.372
Authors: Matthew M Scarpaci; Caitlin C Haven; Alexis L Maule; Kristin J Heaton; Kathryn M Taylor; Jennifer Rood; Maria Ospina; Antonia M Calafat; Susan P Proctor Journal: J Occup Environ Med Date: 2020-03 Impact factor: 2.162
Authors: Stephanie L Richards; Jeffrey Driver; Megan C Dyer; Thomas N Mather; Sheana Funkhouser; Cedar Mitchell; Jo Anne Balanay; Avian White; Steven Meshnick Journal: J Med Entomol Date: 2022-03-16 Impact factor: 2.435
Authors: Ross M Boyce; Enid Muhindo; Emmanuel Baguma; Rabbison Muhindo; Bwambale Shem; Ruthly François; Sam Hawke; Bonnie E Shook-Sa; Moses Ntaro; Aisha Nalusaji; Dan Nyehangane; Raquel Reyes; Jonathan J Juliano; Mark J Siedner; Sarah G Staedke; Edgar M Mulogo Journal: Malar J Date: 2022-02-23 Impact factor: 2.979
Authors: Marta Geretto; Marco Ferrari; Roberta De Angelis; Filippo Crociata; Nicola Sebastiani; Alessandra Pulliero; William Au; Alberto Izzotti Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-05-18 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Jonathan N Hofmann; Laura E Beane Freeman; Kazunori Murata; Gabriella Andreotti; Joseph J Shearer; Katie Thoren; Lakshmi Ramanathan; Christine G Parks; Stella Koutros; Catherine C Lerro; Danping Liu; Nathaniel Rothman; Charles F Lynch; Barry I Graubard; Dale P Sandler; Michael C Alavanja; Ola Landgren Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2021-01-06 Impact factor: 11.035