J A Lee1, C Y Kim, Y J Park, W S Yoon, N K Lee, D S Yang. 1. Department of Radiation Oncology, Korea University Guro Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, 80, Guro2-Dong, Guro-Gu, 152-703, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To determine the variability of patient positioning errors associated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for prostate cancer and to assess the impact of thermoplastic pelvic immobilization on these errors using kilovoltage (kV) cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: From February 2012 to June 2012, the records of 314 IMRT sessions in 19 patients with prostate cancer, performed with or without immobilization at two different facilities in the Korea University Hospital were analyzed. The kV CBCT images were matched to simulation computed tomography (CT) images to determine the simulation-to-treatment variability. The shifts along the x (lateral)-, y (longitudinal)- and z (vertical)-axes were measured, as was the shift in the three dimensional (3D) vector. RESULTS: The measured systematic errors in the immobilized group during treatment were 0.46 ± 1.75 mm along the x-axis, - 0.35 ± 3.83 mm along the y-axis, 0.20 ± 2.75 mm along the z-axis and 4.05 ± 3.02 mm in the 3D vector. Those of nonimmobilized group were - 1.45 ± 7.50 mm along the x-axis, 1.89 ± 5.07 mm along the y-axis, 0.28 ± 3.81 mm along the z-axis and 8.90 ± 4.79 mm in the 3D vector. The group immobilized with pelvic thermoplastics showed reduced interfractional variability along the x- and y-axes and in the 3D vector compared to the nonimmobilized group (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: IMRT with thermoplastic pelvic immobilization in patients with prostate cancer appears to be useful in stabilizing interfractional variability during the planned treatment course.
PURPOSE: To determine the variability of patient positioning errors associated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for prostate cancer and to assess the impact of thermoplastic pelvic immobilization on these errors using kilovoltage (kV) cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: From February 2012 to June 2012, the records of 314 IMRT sessions in 19 patients with prostate cancer, performed with or without immobilization at two different facilities in the Korea University Hospital were analyzed. The kV CBCT images were matched to simulation computed tomography (CT) images to determine the simulation-to-treatment variability. The shifts along the x (lateral)-, y (longitudinal)- and z (vertical)-axes were measured, as was the shift in the three dimensional (3D) vector. RESULTS: The measured systematic errors in the immobilized group during treatment were 0.46 ± 1.75 mm along the x-axis, - 0.35 ± 3.83 mm along the y-axis, 0.20 ± 2.75 mm along the z-axis and 4.05 ± 3.02 mm in the 3D vector. Those of nonimmobilized group were - 1.45 ± 7.50 mm along the x-axis, 1.89 ± 5.07 mm along the y-axis, 0.28 ± 3.81 mm along the z-axis and 8.90 ± 4.79 mm in the 3D vector. The group immobilized with pelvic thermoplastics showed reduced interfractional variability along the x- and y-axes and in the 3D vector compared to the nonimmobilized group (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: IMRT with thermoplastic pelvic immobilization in patients with prostate cancer appears to be useful in stabilizing interfractional variability during the planned treatment course.
Authors: Stephanie T H Peeters; Wilma D Heemsbergen; Peter C M Koper; Wim L J van Putten; Annerie Slot; Michel F H Dielwart; Johannes M G Bonfrer; Luca Incrocci; Joos V Lebesque Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2006-05-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: J Hanley; M A Lumley; G S Mageras; J Sun; M J Zelefsky; S A Leibel; Z Fuks; G J Kutcher Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 1997-01-15 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Amish P Shah; Patrick A Kupelian; Twyla R Willoughby; Katja M Langen; Sanford L Meeks Journal: Radiother Oncol Date: 2011-03-30 Impact factor: 6.280
Authors: Kristina Giske; Eva M Stoiber; Michael Schwarz; Armin Stoll; Marc W Muenter; Carmen Timke; Falk Roeder; Juergen Debus; Peter E Huber; Christian Thieke; Rolf Bendl Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2010-10-08 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Michael Pinkawa; Martin Pursch-Lee; Branka Asadpour; Bernd Gagel; Marc D Piroth; Jens Klotz; Sandra Nussen; Michael J Eble Journal: Strahlenther Onkol Date: 2008-12-24 Impact factor: 3.621
Authors: P Y Song; M Washington; F Vaida; R Hamilton; D Spelbring; B Wyman; J Harrison; G T Chen Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 1996-01-01 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Won Sup Yoon; Dae Sik Yang; Jung Ae Lee; Suk Lee; Young Je Park; Chul Yong Kim Journal: J Appl Clin Med Phys Date: 2012-03-08 Impact factor: 2.102
Authors: Gabriele Reinartz; Uwe Haverkamp; Ramona Wullenkord; Philipp Lehrich; Jan Kriz; Florian Büther; Klaus Schäfers; Michael Schäfers; Hans Theodor Eich Journal: Strahlenther Onkol Date: 2016-02-22 Impact factor: 3.621