Literature DB >> 24343757

Interfractional variability in intensity-modulated radiotherapy of prostate cancer with or without thermoplastic pelvic immobilization.

J A Lee1, C Y Kim, Y J Park, W S Yoon, N K Lee, D S Yang.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the variability of patient positioning errors associated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for prostate cancer and to assess the impact of thermoplastic pelvic immobilization on these errors using kilovoltage (kV) cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: From February 2012 to June 2012, the records of 314 IMRT sessions in 19 patients with prostate cancer, performed with or without immobilization at two different facilities in the Korea University Hospital were analyzed. The kV CBCT images were matched to simulation computed tomography (CT) images to determine the simulation-to-treatment variability. The shifts along the x (lateral)-, y (longitudinal)- and z (vertical)-axes were measured, as was the shift in the three dimensional (3D) vector.
RESULTS: The measured systematic errors in the immobilized group during treatment were 0.46 ± 1.75 mm along the x-axis, - 0.35 ± 3.83 mm along the y-axis, 0.20 ± 2.75 mm along the z-axis and 4.05 ± 3.02 mm in the 3D vector. Those of nonimmobilized group were - 1.45 ± 7.50 mm along the x-axis, 1.89 ± 5.07 mm along the y-axis, 0.28 ± 3.81 mm along the z-axis and 8.90 ± 4.79 mm in the 3D vector. The group immobilized with pelvic thermoplastics showed reduced interfractional variability along the x- and y-axes and in the 3D vector compared to the nonimmobilized group (p < 0.05).
CONCLUSION: IMRT with thermoplastic pelvic immobilization in patients with prostate cancer appears to be useful in stabilizing interfractional variability during the planned treatment course.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24343757     DOI: 10.1007/s00066-013-0452-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol        ISSN: 0179-7158            Impact factor:   3.621


  25 in total

1.  Inclusion of geometrical uncertainties in radiotherapy treatment planning by means of coverage probability.

Authors:  J C Stroom; H C de Boer; H Huizenga; A G Visser
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1999-03-01       Impact factor: 7.038

2.  A quantitative image quality comparison of four different image guided radiotherapy devices.

Authors:  Julia Stützel; Uwe Oelfke; Simeon Nill
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2007-11-26       Impact factor: 6.280

3.  Dose-response in radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer: results of the Dutch multicenter randomized phase III trial comparing 68 Gy of radiotherapy with 78 Gy.

Authors:  Stephanie T H Peeters; Wilma D Heemsbergen; Peter C M Koper; Wim L J van Putten; Annerie Slot; Michel F H Dielwart; Johannes M G Bonfrer; Luca Incrocci; Joos V Lebesque
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-05-01       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Patient positioning variations to reduce dose to normal tissues during 3D conformal radiotherapy for high-risk prostate cancer.

Authors:  K Czigner; P Agoston; G Forgács; M Kásler
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2012-05-23       Impact factor: 3.621

5.  Measurement of patient positioning errors in three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy of the prostate.

Authors:  J Hanley; M A Lumley; G S Mageras; J Sun; M J Zelefsky; S A Leibel; Z Fuks; G J Kutcher
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1997-01-15       Impact factor: 7.038

6.  An evaluation of intrafraction motion of the prostate in the prone and supine positions using electromagnetic tracking.

Authors:  Amish P Shah; Patrick A Kupelian; Twyla R Willoughby; Katja M Langen; Sanford L Meeks
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2011-03-30       Impact factor: 6.280

7.  Local setup errors in image-guided radiotherapy for head and neck cancer patients immobilized with a custom-made device.

Authors:  Kristina Giske; Eva M Stoiber; Michael Schwarz; Armin Stoll; Marc W Muenter; Carmen Timke; Falk Roeder; Juergen Debus; Peter E Huber; Christian Thieke; Rolf Bendl
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2010-10-08       Impact factor: 7.038

8.  Image-guided radiotherapy for prostate cancer. Implementation of ultrasound-based prostate localization for the analysis of inter- and intrafraction organ motion.

Authors:  Michael Pinkawa; Martin Pursch-Lee; Branka Asadpour; Bernd Gagel; Marc D Piroth; Jens Klotz; Sandra Nussen; Michael J Eble
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2008-12-24       Impact factor: 3.621

9.  A comparison of four patient immobilization devices in the treatment of prostate cancer patients with three dimensional conformal radiotherapy.

Authors:  P Y Song; M Washington; F Vaida; R Hamilton; D Spelbring; B Wyman; J Harrison; G T Chen
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1996-01-01       Impact factor: 7.038

10.  The extent and serial pattern of interfractional variation in patients with whole pelvic irradiation: a study using a kilovoltage orthogonal on-board imager.

Authors:  Won Sup Yoon; Dae Sik Yang; Jung Ae Lee; Suk Lee; Young Je Park; Chul Yong Kim
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2012-03-08       Impact factor: 2.102

View more
  2 in total

1.  4D-Listmode-PET-CT and 4D-CT for optimizing PTV margins in gastric lymphoma : Determination of intra- and interfractional gastric motion.

Authors:  Gabriele Reinartz; Uwe Haverkamp; Ramona Wullenkord; Philipp Lehrich; Jan Kriz; Florian Büther; Klaus Schäfers; Michael Schäfers; Hans Theodor Eich
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2016-02-22       Impact factor: 3.621

2.  Comparison of Interfractional Setup Reproducibility between Two Types of Patient Immobilization Devices in Image-Guided Radiation Therapy for Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Shoki Inui; Yoshihiro Ueda; Shingo Ohira; Masaru Isono; Akira Masaoka; Seiya Murata; Yuya Nitta; Tsukasa Karino; Masayoshi Miyazaki; Teruki Teshima
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2018 Oct-Dec
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.