Literature DB >> 24343325

Optimal recovery time for postactivation potentiation in professional soccer players.

Jameson N Mola1, Stewart S Bruce-Low, Scott J Burnet.   

Abstract

Resistance exercise may acutely enhance muscle contractile activity, which is known as postactivation potentiation (PAP). Postactivation potentiation augments important skills that require power production that are necessary during soccer performance. The aim of this study was to determine the optimal recovery time to elicit PAP after a bout of high-intensity resistance exercise in professional soccer players. Twenty-two senior professional soccer players (mean [SD]; age, 23 [4.5] years; stature, 1.83 [6.6] m; body mass, 80.9 [7.8] kg) were randomized to either an experimental (n = 11) or a control group (n = 11). Both groups performed a standardized warm-up and baseline countermovement jump (CMJ) followed by a 10-minute recovery. The control group then performed a CMJ at 15 seconds and at 4, 8, 12, 16, and 20 minutes, whereas the experimental group performed a 3 repetition maximum (RM) squat and then an identical CMJ protocol. No significant differences were found between the groups for CMJ peak power (p > 0.05) or jump height (p > 0.05). No time effect for peak power (F(6,60) = 2.448; p = 0.063) or jump height (F(6,60) = 2.399; p = 0.089) was observed throughout the experimental group trials. Responders (n = 6) displayed individualized PAP profiles at 4 (n = 3), 12 (n = 1), and 16 (n = 2) minutes after conditioning contraction, whereas nonresponders (n = 5) did not. A set of 3RM squats failed to acutely potentiate all participants CMJ performance. Both PAP responders and nonresponders were identified and have individualized PAP time constants. This is not consistent with the previous literature, which used identical protocols. Strength and conditioning practitioners need to individualize recovery "windows" and identify athletes who respond to PAP before undertaking a complex training intervention.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24343325     DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000000313

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Strength Cond Res        ISSN: 1064-8011            Impact factor:   3.775


  13 in total

Review 1.  Understanding Vertical Jump Potentiation: A Deterministic Model.

Authors:  Timothy J Suchomel; Hugh S Lamont; Gavin L Moir
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 11.136

2.  Optimal Training Sequences to Develop Lower Body Force, Velocity, Power, and Jump Height: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  James Marshall; Chris Bishop; Anthony Turner; G Gregory Haff
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2021-03-05       Impact factor: 11.136

3.  Utilising one minute and four minute recovery when employing the resistance training contrast method does not negatively affect subsequent jump performance in the presence of concurrent training.

Authors:  Dean Ritchie; Justin W L Keogh; Peter Reaburn; Jonathan D Bartlett
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2020-10-13       Impact factor: 2.984

4.  Post-Activation Potentiation: Is there an Optimal Training Volume and Intensity to Induce Improvements in Vertical Jump Ability in Highly-Trained Subjects?

Authors:  Ronaldo Kobal; Lucas A Pereira; Katia Kitamura; Anderson C Paulo; Henrique A Ramos; Everton C Carmo; Hamilton Roschel; Valmor Tricoli; Chris Bishop; Irineu Loturco
Journal:  J Hum Kinet       Date:  2019-03-27       Impact factor: 2.193

5.  Post-activation potentiation effect of eccentric overload and traditional weightlifting exercise on jumping and sprinting performance in male athletes.

Authors:  Marco Beato; Alexander E J Bigby; Kevin L De Keijzer; Fabio Y Nakamura; Giuseppe Coratella; Stuart A McErlain-Naylor
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-09-12       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Time to Differentiate Postactivation "Potentiation" from "Performance Enhancement" in the Strength and Conditioning Community.

Authors:  Olaf Prieske; Martin Behrens; Helmi Chaabene; Urs Granacher; Nicola A Maffiuletti
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 11.136

7.  Effects of heavy barbell hip thrust vs back squat on subsequent sprint performance in rugby players.

Authors:  Leandro Carbone; Mateo Garzón; Iván Chulvi-Medrano; Diego A Bonilla; Diego A Alonso; Javier Benítez-Porres; Jorge L Petro; Salvador Vargas-Molina
Journal:  Biol Sport       Date:  2020-07-05       Impact factor: 2.806

8.  The influence of recovery period following a pre-load stimulus on physical performance measures in handball players.

Authors:  Asmadi Ishak; Fui Yen Wong; Antoine Seurot; Scott Cocking; Samuel Andrew Pullinger
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-03-31       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Do Thirty-Second Post-activation Potentiation Exercises Improve the 50-m Freestyle Sprint Performance in Adolescent Swimmers?

Authors:  Zied Abbes; Karim Chamari; Iñigo Mujika; Montassar Tabben; Khalid W Bibi; Ali Mostafa Hussein; Cyril Martin; Monoem Haddad
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2018-10-22       Impact factor: 4.566

10.  Post-Activation Potentiation: Is there an Optimal Training Volume and Intensity to Induce Improvements in Vertical Jump Ability in Highly-Trained Subjects?

Authors:  Ronaldo Kobal; Lucas A Pereira; Katia Kitamura; Anderson C Paulo; Henrique A Ramos; Everton C Carmo; Hamilton Roschel; Valmor Tricoli; Chris Bishop; Irineu Loturco
Journal:  J Hum Kinet       Date:  2019-10-18       Impact factor: 2.193

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.