PURPOSE: This prospective study was to evaluate the significance of fecal calprotectin and lactoferrin for the prediction of ulcerative colitis (UC) relapse. METHODS: Eighty UC patients in remission for ≥3 months on mesalamine as maintenance therapy were included. At entry, stool samples were collected for the measurement of calprotectin and lactoferrin. All patients were followed up for the following 12 months. To identify predictive factors for relapse, time-dependent analyses using the Kaplan-Meier graphs and Cox's proportional hazard model were applied. RESULTS: During the 12 months, 21 patients relapsed. Mean calprotectin and lactoferrin levels were significantly higher in patients with relapse than those in remission (calprotectin-173.7 vs 135.5 μg/g, P = 0.02; lactoferrin-165.1 vs 130.7 μg/g, P = 0.03). A cutoff value of 170 μg/g for calprotectin had a sensitivity of 76 % and a specificity of 76 % to predict relapse, while a cutoff value of 140 μg/g for lactoferrin had a sensitivity of 67 % and a specificity of 68 %. In a multivariate analysis, calprotectin (≥170 μg/g) was a predictor of relapse (hazard ratio, 7.23; P = 0.002). None of the following parameters were significantly associated with relapse: age, gender, duration of UC, number of UC episode, severity of the previous episode, extent of UC, extraintestinal manifestation, and lactoferrin level. CONCLUSIONS: Fecal calprotectin showed a higher sensitivity and specificity than fecal lactoferrin for predicting UC relapse. Fecal calprotectin level appeared to be a significant predictor of relapse in patients with quiescent UC on mesalamine as maintenance therapy.
PURPOSE: This prospective study was to evaluate the significance of fecal calprotectin and lactoferrin for the prediction of ulcerative colitis (UC) relapse. METHODS: Eighty UC patients in remission for ≥3 months on mesalamine as maintenance therapy were included. At entry, stool samples were collected for the measurement of calprotectin and lactoferrin. All patients were followed up for the following 12 months. To identify predictive factors for relapse, time-dependent analyses using the Kaplan-Meier graphs and Cox's proportional hazard model were applied. RESULTS: During the 12 months, 21 patients relapsed. Mean calprotectin and lactoferrin levels were significantly higher in patients with relapse than those in remission (calprotectin-173.7 vs 135.5 μg/g, P = 0.02; lactoferrin-165.1 vs 130.7 μg/g, P = 0.03). A cutoff value of 170 μg/g for calprotectin had a sensitivity of 76 % and a specificity of 76 % to predict relapse, while a cutoff value of 140 μg/g for lactoferrin had a sensitivity of 67 % and a specificity of 68 %. In a multivariate analysis, calprotectin (≥170 μg/g) was a predictor of relapse (hazard ratio, 7.23; P = 0.002). None of the following parameters were significantly associated with relapse: age, gender, duration of UC, number of UC episode, severity of the previous episode, extent of UC, extraintestinal manifestation, and lactoferrin level. CONCLUSIONS: Fecal calprotectin showed a higher sensitivity and specificity than fecal lactoferrin for predicting UC relapse. Fecal calprotectin level appeared to be a significant predictor of relapse in patients with quiescent UC on mesalamine as maintenance therapy.
Authors: Jennifer Jones; Edward V Loftus; Remo Panaccione; Li-Sheng Chen; Sandra Peterson; Joseph McConnell; Linnea Baudhuin; Karen Hanson; Brian G Feagan; Scott W Harmsen; Alan R Zinsmeister; Emelie Helou; William J Sandborn Journal: Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol Date: 2008-09-17 Impact factor: 11.382
Authors: L R Sutherland; F Martin; S Greer; M Robinson; N Greenberger; F Saibil; T Martin; J Sparr; E Prokipchuk; L Borgen Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 1987-06 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: Anders Lasson; Lena Öhman; Per-Ove Stotzer; Stefan Isaksson; Otto Überbacher; Kjell-Arne Ung; Hans Strid Journal: United European Gastroenterol J Date: 2015-02 Impact factor: 4.623
Authors: L Peyrin-Biroulet; W Sandborn; B E Sands; W Reinisch; W Bemelman; R V Bryant; G D'Haens; I Dotan; M Dubinsky; B Feagan; G Fiorino; R Gearry; S Krishnareddy; P L Lakatos; E V Loftus; P Marteau; P Munkholm; T B Murdoch; I Ordás; R Panaccione; R H Riddell; J Ruel; D T Rubin; M Samaan; C A Siegel; M S Silverberg; J Stoker; S Schreiber; S Travis; G Van Assche; S Danese; J Panes; G Bouguen; S O'Donnell; B Pariente; S Winer; S Hanauer; J-F Colombel Journal: Am J Gastroenterol Date: 2015-08-25 Impact factor: 10.864