| Literature DB >> 24343223 |
Gordon J Hedley1, Alexander J Ward1, Alexander Alekseev2, Calvyn T Howells1, Emiliano R Martins1, Luis A Serrano3, Graeme Cooke3, Arvydas Ruseckas1, Ifor D W Samuel1.
Abstract
The morphology of bulk heterojunction organic photovoltaic cells controls many of the performance characteristics of devices. However, measuring this morphology is challenging because of the small length-scales and low contrast between organic materials. Here we use nanoscale photocurrent mapping, ultrafast fluorescence and exciton diffusion to observe the dEntities:
Year: 2013 PMID: 24343223 PMCID: PMC3905772 DOI: 10.1038/ncomms3867
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nat Commun ISSN: 2041-1723 Impact factor: 14.919
Figure 1Chemical structures and device characteristics.
(a) Chemical structures of PTB7, PC71BM and the additive DIO. (b) Absorption spectra of PTB7 (blue dot-dashed line) and PC71BM (red dotted line) films and a 1:1.5 blend film of the two materials (black line). The PL spectra of PC71BM (red solid line) and PTB7 (blue solid line) are shown, paired to the right-hand y axis. Solar cells prepared from this blend with and without additive give devices with external quantum efficiencies (c) and internal quantum efficiencies (d) as shown. The IQE >700 nm has been omitted owing to the falling edge of absorption at these wavelengths. The device performance parameters are as follows. Pristine blend: power conversion efficiency=3.15%, VOC=0.719 V, JSC=−9.17 mA cm−2 and fill factor=0.478. Blend with 3% DIO: power conversion efficiency=6.34%, VOC=0.703 V, JSC=−15.45 mA cm−2 and fill factor=0.584. The device architecture is inset in d with the fabrication as described in the Methods.
Figure 2Results of PTB7:PC71BM blends prepared without additive.
(a) SEM image of the blend viewed from an angle of 52° with a score made across the film showing large domains and a skin of material on top, the black scale bar is 250 nm. Removing the skin by plasma-ashing the topography of the domains measured with AFM is shown in b, and in phase mode in c, indicating that the large domains consist of smaller spheres of material, where the white scale bar is 50 nm. The time-resolved photoluminescence in the blend is presented on short (d) and long (e) timescales, with the blend decay shown as open circles. In d, a best fit to the decay (red line) with a time constant of 330 fs and a pre-exponential factor of 0.81 is found. The slower part is shown in e, indicating that the decay is faster in the blend when compared with a film of PC71BM (black line). The blue line is the best fit from the model for single 60-nm spheres of pure fullerene. The green dashed line is a simulated decay if the pure fullerene spheres were 150 nm, while the orange dotted line is a simulated decay if the spheres were 60 nm of fullerene with 0.2 wt% of PTB7 mixed inside them; neither fits the experimental data. (f) Schematic of morphology, showing large fullerene-rich domains comprised of small spheres of pure PC71BM surrounded by a PTB7-rich mixed phase. A finely mixed phase of the two materials sits between the large domains and also forms a skin on top of the film.
Figure 3Exciton diffusion in PC71BM.
(a) Chemical synthesis scheme of the electron donor-functionalized diketopyrrolopyrrole derivative DPP-NMe2, with synthesis described in the Methods. (b) Absorption spectrum of the DPP-NMe2 molecule that is used in the quenching measurements. The PL spectrum of PC71BM is also shown, indicating that there is some spectral overlap between the fullerene emission and DPP-NMe2 absorption. The shaded vertical bands indicate two spectral regions of fullerene emission, 640–690 nm and 690–740 nm—these regions were used to monitor spectral diffusion of the fullerene exciton and thus determine the hopping time. (c) PL quenching of PC71BM emission when varying the concentration of the DPP-NMe2 quencher from 0 to 5 wt%. The solid lines are fits to the experimental data using the model as defined in the text. The deduced diffusion coefficient as defined in the text is D=1.6 × 10−4 cm2 s−1 and radius RAD=1.5 nm. (d) PL dynamics of PC71BM when looking at two spectral windows, 640–690 nm (open circles) and 690–740 nm (closed squares), as defined in b. A PL decay is observed on the blue side with a best fit (solid line) decay time constant of 7 and 157 ps. In the spectral window 690–740 nm, a rise-time is fitted (solid line) of 7 ps. The instrument response function is shown as a dotted line (3 ps full-width half-maximum).
Figure 4Results of PTB7:PC71BM blends prepared with 3% DIO.
(a) Ultrafast fluorescence dynamics recorded at 710 nm (closed circles) and 760 nm (open circles), representing fullerene emission. The best fit to the data (red line) gives decay time constants of 100 fs representing 80% of the amplitude and 700 fs representing 15%. A significantly slower 100-ps decay is observed to make up the remaining 5% of amplitude and is measured with a streak camera. The instrument response function for the decay up to 2 ps is shown as a dotted line and is 350-fs full-width half-maximum. Shown in b is the topography measured with AFM of the sample as made and in (c) after removing ~20 nm of material with plasma-ashing. The z-scale shown between the two panels is common to both topographies. In d an SEM image of the blend is shown, viewed from an angle of 52° with a score made across the film, enabling the ITO, PEDOT and blend to be imaged in profile, where the white scale bar is 500 nm. (e) Photoconductive–AFM image of a 5 × 5 μm window under 670 nm excitation with +3 V tip bias, the z-scale is photocurrent in units of picoamps. High photocurrent (blue) indicates regions that are polymer-rich, with low photocurrent (red) indicating fullerene-rich regions. Shown in f is a close-up of the black square from e, looking at the morphology of the two materials in detail, the white scale bar is 200 nm. (g) Photocurrent–voltage characteristics for a typical region of high (blue line) and low (red line) photocurrent.