James R Rodrigue1, Matthew Paek, James Whiting, John Vella, Krista Garrison, Martha Pavlakis, Didier A Mandelbrot. 1. 1 Center for Transplant Outcomes and Quality Improvement, The Transplant Institute, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA. 2 Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA. 3 Transplant Center, Maine Medical Center, Portland, ME. 4 Address correspondence to: James R. Rodrigue, Ph.D., The Transplant Institute, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, 110 Francis Street, 7th Floor, Boston, MA 02215.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: While improved health of the recipient may serve as a primary motivating factor, living kidney donors (LDs) also may expect to accrue some personal benefit following donation. This study sought to identify trajectories of perceived benefit over the first 2 years after donation. METHODS: Prospective questionnaire data were collected from 133 LDs from three kidney transplant programs in the United States. Before surgery, LDs completed the Living Donation Expectancies Questionnaire to assess their expectations of personal growth, interpersonal benefits, and spiritual benefits from the donation experience. This report then assessed the degree to which these expectations were met at 1, 6, 12, and 24 months post-donation. RESULTS: Analyses revealed four (Interpersonal Benefit) and five (Personal Growth, Spiritual Benefit) distinct trajectories over time. For some LDs, pre-donation expectancies about benefit were met or exceeded over the 2 years, while for others the anticipated benefits were either short-lived or not met at all. Trajectory group assignment was associated with some donor characteristics (e.g., age, gender, and relationship to recipient). Also, LDs whose recipients had functioning grafts and who reported improved health status following transplantation were more likely to have their pre-donation personal growth and interpersonal benefit expectations consistently met or exceeded. CONCLUSIONS: Longitudinal trajectory analysis can help to identify different outcomes patterns for LDs and factors associated with them. The relevance of these findings is discussed in the context of LD education, follow-up care, and future research on donation benefits.
BACKGROUND: While improved health of the recipient may serve as a primary motivating factor, living kidney donors (LDs) also may expect to accrue some personal benefit following donation. This study sought to identify trajectories of perceived benefit over the first 2 years after donation. METHODS: Prospective questionnaire data were collected from 133 LDs from three kidney transplant programs in the United States. Before surgery, LDs completed the Living Donation Expectancies Questionnaire to assess their expectations of personal growth, interpersonal benefits, and spiritual benefits from the donation experience. This report then assessed the degree to which these expectations were met at 1, 6, 12, and 24 months post-donation. RESULTS: Analyses revealed four (Interpersonal Benefit) and five (Personal Growth, Spiritual Benefit) distinct trajectories over time. For some LDs, pre-donation expectancies about benefit were met or exceeded over the 2 years, while for others the anticipated benefits were either short-lived or not met at all. Trajectory group assignment was associated with some donor characteristics (e.g., age, gender, and relationship to recipient). Also, LDs whose recipients had functioning grafts and who reported improved health status following transplantation were more likely to have their pre-donation personal growth and interpersonal benefit expectations consistently met or exceeded. CONCLUSIONS: Longitudinal trajectory analysis can help to identify different outcomes patterns for LDs and factors associated with them. The relevance of these findings is discussed in the context of LD education, follow-up care, and future research on donation benefits.
Authors: D LaPointe Rudow; R Hays; P Baliga; D J Cohen; M Cooper; G M Danovitch; M A Dew; E J Gordon; D A Mandelbrot; S McGuire; J Milton; D R Moore; M Morgievich; J D Schold; D L Segev; D Serur; R W Steiner; J C Tan; A D Waterman; E Y Zavala; J R Rodrigue Journal: Am J Transplant Date: 2015-02-03 Impact factor: 8.086
Authors: J R Rodrigue; J D Schold; P Morrissey; J Whiting; J Vella; L K Kayler; D Katz; J Jones; B Kaplan; A Fleishman; M Pavlakis; D A Mandelbrot Journal: Am J Transplant Date: 2018-01-09 Impact factor: 8.086
Authors: Lieke Wirken; Henriët van Middendorp; Christina W Hooghof; Jan-Stephan Sanders; Ruth Dam; Karlijn A M I van der Pant; Judith Wierdsma; Hiske Wellink; Philip Ulrichts; Andries J Hoitsma; Luuk B Hilbrands; Andrea W Evers Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2022-03-02 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Sarah E Van Pilsum Rasmussen; Miriam Robin; Amrita Saha; Anne Eno; Romi Lifshitz; Madeleine M Waldram; Samantha N Getsin; Nadia M Chu; Fawaz Al Ammary; Dorry L Segev; Macey L Henderson Journal: Transplant Direct Date: 2020-11-10