Literature DB >> 24342872

Small animal magnetic resonance imaging: an efficient tool to assess liver volume and intrahepatic vascular anatomy.

Emmanuel Melloul1, Dimitri A Raptis1, Andreas Boss2, Thomas Pfammater2, Christoph Tschuor1, Yinghua Tian1, Rolf Graf1, Pierre-Alain Clavien1, Mickael Lesurtel3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To develop a noninvasive technique to assess liver volumetry and intrahepatic portal vein anatomy in a mouse model of liver regeneration.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty-two C57BL/6 male mice underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the liver using a 4.7 T small animal MRI system after no treatment, 70% partial hepatectomy (PH), or selective portal vein embolization. The protocol consisted of the following sequences: three-dimensional-encoded spoiled gradient-echo sequence (repetition time per echo time 15 per 2.7 ms, flip angle 20°) for volumetry, and two-dimensional-encoded time-of-flight angiography sequence (repetition time per echo time 18 per 6.4 ms, flip angle 80°) for vessel visualization. Liver volume and portal vein segmentation was performed using a dedicated postprocessing software. In animals with portal vein embolization, portography served as reference standard. True liver volume was measured after sacrificing the animals. Measurements were carried out by two independent observers with subsequent analysis by the Cohen κ-test for interobserver agreement.
RESULTS: MRI liver volumetry highly correlated with the true liver volume measurement using a conventional method in both the untreated liver and the liver remnant after 70% PH with a high interobserver correlation coefficient of 0.94 (95% confidence interval, 0.80-0.98 for untreated liver [P < 0.001] and 0.90-0.97 after 70% PH [P < 0.001]). The diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance angiography for the occlusion of one branch of the portal vein was 0.95 (95% confidence interval, 0.84-1). The level of agreement between the two observers for the description of intrahepatic vascular anatomy was excellent (Cohen κ value = 0.925).
CONCLUSIONS: This protocol may be used for noninvasive liver volumetry and visualization of portal vein anatomy in mice. It will serve the dynamic study of new strategies to enhance liver regeneration in vivo.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hepatectomy; Liver hypertrophy; Liver regeneration; Magnetic resonance imaging; Portal vein embolization; Portography

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24342872     DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2013.11.1079

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Surg Res        ISSN: 0022-4804            Impact factor:   2.192


  5 in total

1.  In vivo Biodistribution of Radiolabeled Acoustic Protein Nanostructures.

Authors:  Johann Le Floc'h; Aimen Zlitni; Holly A Bilton; Melissa Yin; Arash Farhadi; Nancy R Janzen; Mikhail G Shapiro; John F Valliant; F Stuart Foster
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 3.488

2.  Visualization of Vascular and Parenchymal Regeneration after 70% Partial Hepatectomy in Normal Mice.

Authors:  Chichi Xie; Weiwei Wei; Andrea Schenk; Lars Ole Schwen; Sara Zafarnia; Michael Schwier; Felix Gremse; Isabel Jank; Olaf Dirsch; Uta Dahmen
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2016-09-13       Impact factor: 1.355

3.  Single- versus dual-console robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: impact on intraoperative and postoperative outcomes in a teaching institution.

Authors:  Monica S C Morgan; Nabeel A Shakir; Maurilio Garcia-Gil; Asim Ozayar; Jeffrey C Gahan; Justin I Friedlander; Claus G Roehrborn; Jeffrey A Cadeddu
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2014-06-28       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  Prediction of small for size syndrome after extended hepatectomy: Tissue characterization by relaxometry, diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging and magnetization transfer.

Authors:  Christian Eberhardt; Moritz C Wurnig; Andrea Wirsching; Cristina Rossi; Idana Feldmane; Mickael Lesurtel; Andreas Boss
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-02-14       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Quantification of Hepatic Vascular and Parenchymal Regeneration in Mice.

Authors:  Chichi Xie; Lars Ole Schwen; Weiwei Wei; Andrea Schenk; Sara Zafarnia; Felix Gremse; Uta Dahmen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-08-05       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.