Sameer Mal1, Shelley McLeod2, Alla Iansavichene3, Adam Dukelow2, Michael Lewell2. 1. Division of Emergency Medicine, Department of Medicine, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada; London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ontario, Canada. Electronic address: jmal@uwo.ca. 2. Division of Emergency Medicine, Department of Medicine, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada; London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ontario, Canada. 3. London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ontario, Canada.
Abstract
STUDY OBJECTIVE: Noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation (NIPPV) is increasingly being used by emergency medical services (EMS) for treatment of patients in respiratory distress. The primary objective of this systematic review is to determine whether out-of-hospital NIPPV for treatment of adults with severe respiratory distress reduces inhospital mortality compared with "standard" therapy. Secondary objectives are to examine the need for invasive ventilation, hospital and ICU length of stay, and complications. METHODS: Electronic searches of MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature were conducted and reference lists of relevant articles hand searched. Randomized controlled trials comparing out-of-hospital NIPPV with standard therapy in adults (aged ≥16 years) with severe respiratory distress published in English were included. Two reviewers independently screened abstracts, assessed quality of the studies, and extracted data. Data were pooled with random-effects models and reported as risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and number needed to treat (NNT). RESULTS: Seven randomized controlled trials were included, with a combined total of 632 patients; 313 in the standard therapy group and 319 in the NIPPV group. In patients treated with NIPPV, the pooled estimate showed a reduction in both inhospital mortality (RR 0.58; 95% CI 0.35 to 0.95; NNT=18) and need for invasive ventilation (RR 0.37; 95% CI 0.24 to 0.58; NNT=8). There was no difference in ICU or hospital length of stay. CONCLUSION: Out-of-hospital administration of NIPPV appears to be an effective therapy for adult patients with severe respiratory distress.
STUDY OBJECTIVE: Noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation (NIPPV) is increasingly being used by emergency medical services (EMS) for treatment of patients in respiratory distress. The primary objective of this systematic review is to determine whether out-of-hospital NIPPV for treatment of adults with severe respiratory distress reduces inhospital mortality compared with "standard" therapy. Secondary objectives are to examine the need for invasive ventilation, hospital and ICU length of stay, and complications. METHODS: Electronic searches of MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature were conducted and reference lists of relevant articles hand searched. Randomized controlled trials comparing out-of-hospital NIPPV with standard therapy in adults (aged ≥16 years) with severe respiratory distress published in English were included. Two reviewers independently screened abstracts, assessed quality of the studies, and extracted data. Data were pooled with random-effects models and reported as risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and number needed to treat (NNT). RESULTS: Seven randomized controlled trials were included, with a combined total of 632 patients; 313 in the standard therapy group and 319 in the NIPPV group. In patients treated with NIPPV, the pooled estimate showed a reduction in both inhospital mortality (RR 0.58; 95% CI 0.35 to 0.95; NNT=18) and need for invasive ventilation (RR 0.37; 95% CI 0.24 to 0.58; NNT=8). There was no difference in ICU or hospital length of stay. CONCLUSION: Out-of-hospital administration of NIPPV appears to be an effective therapy for adult patients with severe respiratory distress.
Authors: Jose Luis Lopez-Campos; Luis Jara-Palomares; Xavier Muñoz; Víctor Bustamante; Esther Barreiro Journal: Ann Thorac Med Date: 2015 Apr-Jun Impact factor: 2.219
Authors: Skule A Bakke; Morten T Botker; Ingunn S Riddervold; Hans Kirkegaard; Erika F Christensen Journal: Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med Date: 2014-11-22 Impact factor: 2.953
Authors: Sammy S Hodroge; Melody Glenn; Amelia Breyre; Bennett Lee; Nick R Aldridge; Karl A Sporer; Kristi L Koenig; Marianne Gausche-Hill; Angelo A Salvucci; Eric M Rudnick; John F Brown; Gregory H Gilbert Journal: West J Emerg Med Date: 2020-06-25