Literature DB >> 24342778

An ethnobotanical study of medicinal plants used by tribal and native people of Madhupur forest area, Bangladesh.

Md Khirul Islam1, Sanjib Saha1, Imran Mahmud1, Khalit Mohamad2, Khalijah Awang3, Shaikh Jamal Uddin4, Md Mustafizur Rahman1, Jamil A Shilpi5.   

Abstract

ETHNOPHARMACOLOGICAL RELEVANCE: Madhupur forest area, Tangail is one of early human settlements in Bangladesh. Having abode in the vicinity of the forest, a strong ethnobotanical practice has prevailed in this area since ancient time. Due to the rapid deforestation during the last few decades, many plants have already disappeared or are facing extinction. Thus we attempted to document the medicinal plant use of Madhupur forest area with a view to preserve the ethnobotanical knowledge and in order to protect the biodiversity of this area.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The fieldwork was conducted during a period of 1 year. Data was collected by interview, questionnaire, and group discussion with randomly selected informants including indigenous, tribal people, and Traditional Health Practitioners (THPs) living in the study area. Recorded plants are listed along with their indication, part used, form of preparation and use value (UV). Results were also analysed to determine informant consensus factor (ICF) and fidelity level (FL) of the plants on the basis of their use under various ailment categories.
RESULTS: The present study has documented 78 medicinal plant species from 45 families used for the treatment of at least 77 different major and minor ailments and conditions. Medicinal plant species were categorised as tree, shrub, tuber, herb, and climber. Leaves were found to be the most frequently used plant part while decoction is the major form of preparation. In most cases preparations are either administered orally or applied topically.
CONCLUSION: The present study revealed that some of the well-known medicinal plants are used extensively demonstrating an effective ethnobotanical practice in the study area. Plants with high ICF and FL values can be subjected to bioassay guided investigation while plants which scored low UVs require bioactivity screening to justify their use for the reported ailment.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Fidelity level; Garo tribe; Indigenous knowledge; Informant consensus factor; Traditional health practitioners; Use value

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24342778     DOI: 10.1016/j.jep.2013.11.056

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Ethnopharmacol        ISSN: 0378-8741            Impact factor:   4.360


  21 in total

1.  Ethnomedicinal survey of various communities residing in Garo Hills of Durgapur, Bangladesh.

Authors:  Md Arif Khan; Md Khirul Islam; Md Afjalus Siraj; Sanjib Saha; Apurba Kumar Barman; Khalijah Awang; Md Mustafizur Rahman; Jamil A Shilpi; Rownak Jahan; Erena Islam; Mohammed Rahmatullah
Journal:  J Ethnobiol Ethnomed       Date:  2015-05-30       Impact factor: 2.733

Review 2.  Ethnobotany, Phytochemistry and Pharmacological Features of Centella asiatica: A Comprehensive Review.

Authors:  Farshad Abedi Torbati; Mahin Ramezani; Reza Dehghan; Mohammad Sadegh Amiri; Ali Tafazoli Moghadam; Neda Shakour; Sepideh Elyasi; Amirhossein Sahebkar; Seyed Ahmad Emami
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2021       Impact factor: 2.622

Review 3.  Betelvine (Piper betle L.): A comprehensive insight into its ethnopharmacology, phytochemistry, and pharmacological, biomedical and therapeutic attributes.

Authors:  Protha Biswas; Uttpal Anand; Suchismita Chatterjee Saha; Nishi Kant; Tulika Mishra; Harison Masih; Ananya Bar; Devendra Kumar Pandey; Niraj Kumar Jha; Madhumita Majumder; Neela Das; Vijaykumar Shivaji Gadekar; Mahipal S Shekhawat; Manoj Kumar; Jarosław Proćków; José M Pérez de la Lastra; Abhijit Dey
Journal:  J Cell Mol Med       Date:  2022-05-02       Impact factor: 5.295

4.  An ethnopharmacological evaluation of Navapind and Shahpur Virkanin district Sheikupura, Pakistan for their herbal medicines.

Authors:  Maria Zahoor; Zubaida Yousaf; Tahreem Aqsa; Manahil Haroon; Nadia Saleh; Arusa Aftab; Sadia Javed; Mouzma Qadeer; Habiba Ramazan
Journal:  J Ethnobiol Ethnomed       Date:  2017-05-08       Impact factor: 2.733

5.  Descriptive study of plant resources in the context of the ethnomedicinal relevance of indigenous flora: A case study from Toli Peer National Park, Azad Jammu and Kashmir, Pakistan.

Authors:  Muhammad Shoaib Amjad; Mirza Faisal Qaeem; Israr Ahmad; Sami Ullah Khan; Sunbal Khalil Chaudhari; Nafeesa Zahid Malik; Humaira Shaheen; Arshad Mehmood Khan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-02-13       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Ethnomedicinal plants used by local inhabitants of Jakholi block, Rudraprayag district, western Himalaya, India.

Authors:  Ankit Singh; Mohan C Nautiyal; Ripu M Kunwar; Rainer W Bussmann
Journal:  J Ethnobiol Ethnomed       Date:  2017-08-24       Impact factor: 2.733

7.  Quantitative Ethnobotany of Medicinal Plants Used by Indigenous Communities in the Bandarban District of Bangladesh.

Authors:  Mohammad O Faruque; Shaikh B Uddin; James W Barlow; Sheng Hu; Shuang Dong; Qian Cai; Xiaohua Li; Xuebo Hu
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2018-02-06       Impact factor: 5.810

8.  Traditional plants used for the treatment of gynaecological disorders in Vedaranyam taluk, South India - An ethnomedicinal survey.

Authors:  S Balamurugan; S Vijayakumar; S Prabhu; J E Morvin Yabesh
Journal:  J Tradit Complement Med       Date:  2017-07-04

9.  Previously published ethno-pharmacological reports reveal the potentiality of plants and plant-derived products used as traditional home remedies by Bangladeshi COVID-19 patients to combat SARS-CoV-2.

Authors:  A T M Rafiqul Islam; Jannatul Ferdousi; Md Shahinozzaman
Journal:  Saudi J Biol Sci       Date:  2021-07-17       Impact factor: 4.219

10.  Exploration of ethno-medicinal knowledge among rural communities of Pearl Valley; Rawalakot, District Poonch Azad Jammu and Kashmir.

Authors:  Humaira Shaheen; Mirza Faisal Qaseem; Muhammad Shoaib Amjad; Piero Bruschi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-09-08       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.