Literature DB >> 24341726

Trust-level risk evaluation and risk control guidance in the NHS East of England.

Alan J Card1, James R Ward, P John Clarkson.   

Abstract

In recent years, the healthcare sector has adopted the use of operational risk assessment tools to help understand the systems issues that lead to patient safety incidents. But although these problem-focused tools have improved the ability of healthcare organizations to identify hazards, they have not translated into measurable improvements in patient safety. One possible reason for this is a lack of support for the solution-focused process of risk control. This article describes a content analysis of the risk management strategies, policies, and procedures at all acute (i.e., hospital), mental health, and ambulance trusts (health service organizations) in the East of England area of the British National Health Service. The primary goal was to determine what organizational-level guidance exists to support risk control practice. A secondary goal was to examine the risk evaluation guidance provided by these trusts. With regard to risk control, we found an almost complete lack of useful guidance to promote good practice. With regard to risk evaluation, the trusts relied exclusively on risk matrices. A number of weaknesses were found in the use of this tool, especially related to the guidance for scoring an event's likelihood. We make a number of recommendations to address these concerns. The guidance assessed provides insufficient support for risk control and risk evaluation. This may present a significant barrier to the success of risk management approaches in improving patient safety.
© 2013 Society for Risk Analysis.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Patient safety; healthcare risk management; risk control; risk evaluation; risk matrix

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24341726     DOI: 10.1111/risa.12159

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Risk Anal        ISSN: 0272-4332            Impact factor:   4.000


  8 in total

1.  Electronic Health Record-Related Safety Concerns: A Cross-Sectional Survey of Electronic Health Record Users.

Authors:  Sari Palojoki; Tuuli Pajunen; Kaija Saranto; Lasse Lehtonen
Journal:  JMIR Med Inform       Date:  2016-05-06

Review 2.  Risk Management in Executive Levels of Healthcare Organizations: Insights from a Scoping Review (2018).

Authors:  Masoud Ferdosi; Reza Rezayatmand; Yasamin Molavi Taleghani
Journal:  Risk Manag Healthc Policy       Date:  2020-03-19

Review 3.  Risk Analysis in Healthcare Organizations: Methodological Framework and Critical Variables.

Authors:  Giacomo Pascarella; Matteo Rossi; Emma Montella; Arturo Capasso; Gianfranco De Feo; Gerardo Botti; Antonio Nardone; Paolo Montuori; Maria Triassi; Stefania D'Auria; Alessandro Morabito
Journal:  Risk Manag Healthc Policy       Date:  2021-07-08

Review 4.  The problem with Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles.

Authors:  Julie E Reed; Alan J Card
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2015-12-23       Impact factor: 7.035

5.  The problem with root cause analysis.

Authors:  Mohammad Farhad Peerally; Susan Carr; Justin Waring; Mary Dixon-Woods
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2016-06-23       Impact factor: 7.035

6.  Development of an enterprise risk inventory for healthcare.

Authors:  Ana Paula Beck da Silva Etges; Veronique Grenon; Ming Lu; Ricardo Bertoglio Cardoso; Joana Siqueira de Souza; Francisco José Kliemann Neto; Elaine Aparecida Felix
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2018-07-24       Impact factor: 2.655

7.  A framework to support risk assessment in hospitals.

Authors:  Gulsum Kubra Kaya; James R Ward; P John Clarkson
Journal:  Int J Qual Health Care       Date:  2019-06-01       Impact factor: 2.038

8.  Risk Assessment Matrices for Workplace Hazards: Design for Usability.

Authors:  Roger C Jensen; Royce L Bird; Blake W Nichols
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-02-27       Impact factor: 3.390

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.