Literature DB >> 24340813

What can we learn from studies based on small sample sizes? Comment on Regan, Lakhanpal, and Anguiano (2012).

David R Johnson1, Lauren K Bachan2.   

Abstract

In a recent article, Regan, Lakhanpal, and Anguiano (2012) highlighted the lack of evidence for different relationship outcomes between arranged and love-based marriages. Yet the sample size (n = 58) used in the study is insufficient for making such inferences. This reply discusses and demonstrates how small sample sizes reduce the utility of this research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24340813      PMCID: PMC3990435          DOI: 10.2466/21.02.07.pr0.113x12z8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Rep        ISSN: 0033-2941


  5 in total

1.  The statistical power of abnormal-social psychological research: a review.

Authors:  J COHEN
Journal:  J Abnorm Soc Psychol       Date:  1962-09

2.  Statistical power of psychological research: what have we gained in 20 years?

Authors:  J S Rossi
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  1990-10

3.  Relationship outcomes in Indian-American love-based and arranged marriages.

Authors:  Pamela C Regan; Saloni Lakhanpal; Carlos Anguiano
Journal:  Psychol Rep       Date:  2012-06

4.  Re-evaluation of the "no differences" hypothesis concerning gay and lesbian parenting as assessed in eight early (1979-1986) and four later (1997-1998) dissertations.

Authors:  Walter R Schumm
Journal:  Psychol Rep       Date:  2008-08

5.  What was really learned from Tasker and Golombok's (1995) study of lesbian and single parent mothers?

Authors:  Walter R Schumm
Journal:  Psychol Rep       Date:  2004-04
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.