Literature DB >> 24339652

An unusual cause of decrease in GCS in a patient with craniofacial injury.

Chandni Sinha1, Chhavi Sawhney, Arati Rai, Ajeet Kumar, Anshuman Mishra.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2013        PMID: 24339652      PMCID: PMC3841503          DOI: 10.4103/0972-5229.120337

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Crit Care Med        ISSN: 0972-5229


× No keyword cloud information.
Sir, A 40-year-old male with multiple injuries was referred to JPNA trauma centre 12 hours after road traffic accident. He had sustained craniofacial injury with fractured upper limb (LeFort type 2 facial injury and supracondylar fracture of right humerus). On examination, patient had an oxygen saturation Sp02 of 95% on oxygen mask (with a flow rate of 5lts/min), a heart rate of 115/min and blood pressure 90/60 mm Hg. GCS on examination was E1V1M1. He had received initial care at the referring private hospital, where a Foley catheter was inserted in the right nasal cavity to control epistaxis, and a cast was applied for the fractured humerus. At the time of referral from the previous hospital the GCS was 10 (E2V4M4). In the time interval of 3 hours to arrival at our ED, the GCS had deteriorated to 3. A CT head on arrival showed that the tip of the Foley's catheter lay in the left parietal region intracranially with the inflated balloon located in the left centrum semiovale [Figure 1]. There was cerebral edema with parietal hypodensity, suggestive of an infarct. In view of the low GCS, it was decided to shift the patient to the ICU and manage him conservatively with ICP monitoring, controlled ventilation, and antibiotics. As the coagulation profile of the patient was normal, the balloon of the Foleys was gradually deflated followed by removal of the catheter. A repeat CT showed no change in the size and extent of the infarct. Despite all efforts, patient expired on the 4th day of admission.
Figure 1

Plain axial CT head showing tip of Foley catheter in the parietal region

Plain axial CT head showing tip of Foley catheter in the parietal region The initial management of craniofacial trauma is more challenging than the management of head trauma alone. The use of pressure application to control epistaxis is an age-old, time-tested method. Among many devices, Foley catheter is one of the more frequently used, especially in a resource-limited setting. This is despite the fact that the Foley catheter is not designed for this purpose and can cause various complications such as balloon malposition, bleeding, and pressure necrosis.[12] Since it is very difficult to ascertain the correct intranasal length required for successful hemostatis, chances of balloon malpositions are high. There have been earlier case reports where the balloon had been inflated in the intracranial cavity.[34] Hence, we recommend that posterior nasal packing with Foley catheter should be discouraged in patients with craniofacial injuries. Endoscopic cauterization should be the preferred method. If at all a Foley catheter has to be used in an emergency, a few principles should be followed: Use of a large bore catheter as it will have less tendency to migrate intracranially[5] Advancing the catheter parallel to the floor of nasal cavity Advancing the catheter up to a distance of 11 to 13 cm and confirming the visualization of the catheter tip in the oropharynx Clinically and radiographically identifying the catheter tip before inflating the balloon.[4] While the use of a Foley catheter for control of nasal bleeding has been described previously, and indeed the correct ‘off-label’ use of such a device may be a useful first aid, we wished to highlight the potential catastrophic consequences that such an approach can entail.
  5 in total

1.  Intracranial migration of Foley catheter--an unusual complication.

Authors:  Sanjay J Pawar; Rewati Raman Sharma; Santosh D Lad
Journal:  J Clin Neurosci       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 1.961

2.  How we do it: a practical approach to Foley catheter posterior nasal packing.

Authors:  E C Ho; N J Mansell
Journal:  Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci       Date:  2004-12

3.  Intracranial placement of a Foley catheter: a rare complication.

Authors:  Hyun-Jae Woo; Chang Hoon Bai; Si-Youn Song; Yong-Dae Kim
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 3.497

4.  Examining the safety of nasogastric tube placement after endoscopic sinus surgery.

Authors:  N Bhattacharyya; H V Gopal
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 1.547

5.  The Foley catheter in epistaxis management--a scientific appraisal.

Authors:  C Hartley; P R Axon
Journal:  J Laryngol Otol       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 1.469

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.