Literature DB >> 24339261

Regional vulnerability of hippocampal subfields to aging measured by structural and diffusion MRI.

Joana B Pereira1, Cinta Valls-Pedret, Emilio Ros, Eva Palacios, Carles Falcón, Nuria Bargalló, David Bartrés-Faz, Lars-Olof Wahlund, Eric Westman, Carme Junque.   

Abstract

In the past few years, there has been an increasing awareness of the regional vulnerability of the hippocampus to age-related processes. However, to date, no studies have assessed the effects of age on different structural magnetic resonance parameters in the specific hippocampal subfields. In this study, we measured volume, mean diffusivity (MD) and fractional anisotropy (FA) in the presubiculum, subiculum, fimbria, cornu ammonis (CA) 1,2-3,4-DG and the whole hippocampus in fifty cognitively intact elder adults between 50 and 75 years of age (20 men, 30 women). Segmentation of hippocampal subfields was performed using FreeSurfer. Individual MD and FA images were coregistered to T1-weighted volumes using FLIRT of FSL. Linear regression analyses were performed to assess the effects of age on the anatomical measures of each subfield. In addition, multiple regression analyses were also carried out to assess which of the anatomical measures that showed a correlation with age in the previous analyses, were the best age predictors in the hippocampus. In agreement with previous studies, our results showed a significant association between age and volume (P < 0.001) as well as MD (P < 0.001) in the whole hippocampus. Regarding the specific hippocampal subfields, we found that age had a significant negative effect on volume in CA2-3 (P < 0.001) and CA4-DG (P < 0.001). Importantly, we found a positive effect of age on MD in CA2-3 (P < 0.001) and fimbria (P < 0.001) as well as a negative age effect on FA in the subiculum (P < 0.001). Multiple regression analyses revealed that the best overall predictors of age in the hippocampus were MD in the fimbria and volume of CA2-3, which explained 73.8% of the age variance. These results indicate that age has an effect both on volume and diffusion tensor imaging measures in different subfields, suggesting they provide complementary information on age-related processes in the hippocampus.
Copyright © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  age; fractional anisotropy; hippocampus; mean diffusivity; volume

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24339261     DOI: 10.1002/hipo.22234

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hippocampus        ISSN: 1050-9631            Impact factor:   3.899


  26 in total

1.  Differential associations of age with volume and microstructure of hippocampal subfields in healthy older adults.

Authors:  Dominik Wolf; Florian U Fischer; Robin de Flores; Gaël Chételat; Andreas Fellgiebel
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2015-06-24       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Functional consequences of neurite orientation dispersion and density in humans across the adult lifespan.

Authors:  Arash Nazeri; M Mallar Chakravarty; David J Rotenberg; Tarek K Rajji; Yogesh Rathi; Oleg V Michailovich; Aristotle N Voineskos
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-01-28       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Automated volumetry and regional thickness analysis of hippocampal subfields and medial temporal cortical structures in mild cognitive impairment.

Authors:  Paul A Yushkevich; John B Pluta; Hongzhi Wang; Long Xie; Song-Lin Ding; Eske C Gertje; Lauren Mancuso; Daria Kliot; Sandhitsu R Das; David A Wolk
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2014-09-02       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Effects of age and Alzheimer's disease on hippocampal subfields: comparison between manual and FreeSurfer volumetry.

Authors:  Robin de Flores; Renaud La Joie; Brigitte Landeau; Audrey Perrotin; Florence Mézenge; Vincent de La Sayette; Francis Eustache; Béatrice Desgranges; Gaël Chételat
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2014-09-18       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  Age- and memory- related differences in hippocampal gray matter integrity are better captured by NODDI compared to single-tensor diffusion imaging.

Authors:  Anu Venkatesh; Shauna M Stark; Craig E L Stark; Ilana J Bennett
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2020-08-12       Impact factor: 4.673

6.  Lesions to the CA2 region of the hippocampus impair social memory in mice.

Authors:  Erica L Stevenson; Heather K Caldwell
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2014-08-11       Impact factor: 3.386

7.  Quantitative comparison of 21 protocols for labeling hippocampal subfields and parahippocampal subregions in in vivo MRI: towards a harmonized segmentation protocol.

Authors:  Paul A Yushkevich; Robert S C Amaral; Jean C Augustinack; Andrew R Bender; Jeffrey D Bernstein; Marina Boccardi; Martina Bocchetta; Alison C Burggren; Valerie A Carr; M Mallar Chakravarty; Gaël Chételat; Ana M Daugherty; Lila Davachi; Song-Lin Ding; Arne Ekstrom; Mirjam I Geerlings; Abdul Hassan; Yushan Huang; J Eugenio Iglesias; Renaud La Joie; Geoffrey A Kerchner; Karen F LaRocque; Laura A Libby; Nikolai Malykhin; Susanne G Mueller; Rosanna K Olsen; Daniela J Palombo; Mansi B Parekh; John B Pluta; Alison R Preston; Jens C Pruessner; Charan Ranganath; Naftali Raz; Margaret L Schlichting; Dorothee Schoemaker; Sachi Singh; Craig E L Stark; Nanthia Suthana; Alexa Tompary; Marta M Turowski; Koen Van Leemput; Anthony D Wagner; Lei Wang; Julie L Winterburn; Laura E M Wisse; Michael A Yassa; Michael M Zeineh
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2015-01-14       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  Depressive symptoms modify age effects on hippocampal subfields in older adults.

Authors:  Sarah M Szymkowicz; Molly E McLaren; Andrew O'Shea; Adam J Woods; Stephen D Anton; Vonetta M Dotson
Journal:  Geriatr Gerontol Int       Date:  2016-10-02       Impact factor: 2.730

9.  Age differences in hippocampal subfield volumes from childhood to late adulthood.

Authors:  Ana M Daugherty; Andrew R Bender; Naftali Raz; Noa Ofen
Journal:  Hippocampus       Date:  2015-09-04       Impact factor: 3.899

10.  Volume of the hippocampal subfields in healthy adults: differential associations with age and a pro-inflammatory genetic variant.

Authors:  Naftali Raz; Ana M Daugherty; Andrew R Bender; Cheryl L Dahle; Susan Land
Journal:  Brain Struct Funct       Date:  2014-06-20       Impact factor: 3.270

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.