Literature DB >> 24338915

Can real time location system technology (RTLS) provide useful estimates of time use by nursing personnel?

Terry L Jones1, Cara Schlegel.   

Abstract

Accurate, precise, unbiased, reliable, and cost-effective estimates of nursing time use are needed to insure safe staffing levels. Direct observation of nurses is costly, and conventional surrogate measures have limitations. To test the potential of electronic capture of time and motion through real time location systems (RTLS), a pilot study was conducted to assess efficacy (method agreement) of RTLS time use; inter-rater reliability of RTLS time-use estimates; and associated costs. Method agreement was high (mean absolute difference = 28 seconds); inter-rater reliability was high (ICC = 0.81-0.95; mean absolute difference = 2 seconds); and costs for obtaining RTLS time-use estimates on a single nursing unit exceeded $25,000. Continued experimentation with RTLS to obtain time-use estimates for nursing staff is warranted.
© 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  instrument development and validation; nursing staffing; patient safety; quality assurance; radiofrequency identification technology; real time location systems; time and motion studies

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24338915      PMCID: PMC5541674          DOI: 10.1002/nur.21578

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Res Nurs Health        ISSN: 0160-6891            Impact factor:   2.228


  28 in total

Review 1.  Hospital restructuring and the work of registered nurses.

Authors:  B R Norrish; T G Rundall
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 4.911

2.  Work sampling: valuable methodology to define nursing practice patterns.

Authors:  Dianne Pelletier; Christine Duffield
Journal:  Nurs Health Sci       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 1.857

3.  Radiofrequency identification: exploiting an old technology for measuring nurse time and motion.

Authors:  Terry L Jones
Journal:  Comput Inform Nurs       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 1.985

4.  How many nurses per patient? Measurements of nurse staffing in health services research.

Authors:  Joanne Spetz; Nancy Donaldson; Carolyn Aydin; Diane S Brown
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2008-05-05       Impact factor: 3.402

5.  A comparison of work-sampling and time-and-motion techniques for studies in health services research.

Authors:  S A Finkler; J R Knickman; G Hendrickson; M Lipkin; W G Thompson
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 3.402

6.  A comparison of time-and-motion and self-reporting methods of work measurement.

Authors:  T A Burke; J R McKee; H C Wilson; R M Donahue; A S Batenhorst; D S Pathak
Journal:  J Nurs Adm       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 1.737

7.  A 36-hospital time and motion study: how do medical-surgical nurses spend their time?

Authors:  Ann Hendrich; Marilyn P Chow; Boguslaw A Skierczynski; Zhenqiang Lu
Journal:  Perm J       Date:  2008

Review 8.  Nurse staffing levels and hospital mortality in critical care settings: literature review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yuka Numata; Michael Schulzer; Rena van der Wal; Judith Globerman; Pat Semeniuk; Ellen Balka; J Mark Fitzgerald
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 3.187

9.  Expanding potential of radiofrequency nurse call systems to measure nursing time in patient rooms.

Authors:  Linda Fahey; Karen Dunn Lopez; Judith Storfjell; Gail Keenan
Journal:  J Nurs Adm       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 1.737

10.  Participant observation of time allocation, direct patient contact and simultaneous activities in hospital physicians.

Authors:  Matthias Weigl; Andreas Müller; Andrea Zupanc; Peter Angerer
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2009-06-29       Impact factor: 2.655

View more
  7 in total

1.  Measuring impact of a quality improvement initiative on glaucoma clinic flow using an automated real-time locating system.

Authors:  John A Musser; Juno Cho; Amy Cohn; Leslie M Niziol; Dena Ballouz; David T Burke; Paula Anne Newman-Casey
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-06-28       Impact factor: 2.086

2.  Nursing Workflow Change in a COVID-19 Inpatient Unit Following the Deployment of Inpatient Telehealth: Observational Study Using a Real-Time Locating System.

Authors:  Stacie Vilendrer; Mary E Lough; Donn W Garvert; Monique H Lambert; Jonathan Hsijing Lu; Birju Patel; Nigam H Shah; Michelle Y Williams; Samantha M R Kling
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2022-06-17       Impact factor: 7.076

3.  Improving Clinic Operational Efficiency and Utilization with RTLS.

Authors:  Bjorn Berg; Grant Longley; Jordan Dunitz
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2019-01-30       Impact factor: 4.460

Review 4.  Real-time locating systems to improve healthcare delivery: A systematic review.

Authors:  Kevin M Overmann; Danny T Y Wu; Catherine T Xu; Shwetha S Bindhu; Lindsey Barrick
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2021-06-12       Impact factor: 4.497

5.  SecurAstaP trial: securement with SecurAcath versus StatLock for peripherally inserted central catheters, a randomised open trial.

Authors:  Godelieve Alice Goossens; Niel Grumiaux; Christel Janssens; Martine Jérôme; Steffen Fieuws; Philip Moons; Marguerite Stas; Geert Maleux
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-02-24       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  Real-time location system-based asset tracking in the healthcare field: lessons learned from a feasibility study.

Authors:  Sooyoung Yoo; Seok Kim; Eunhye Kim; Eunja Jung; Kee-Hyuck Lee; Hee Hwang
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2018-09-10       Impact factor: 2.796

7.  Use of a Real-Time Locating System for Contact Tracing of Health Care Workers During the COVID-19 Pandemic at an Infectious Disease Center in Singapore: Validation Study.

Authors:  Hanley J Ho; Zoe Xiaozhu Zhang; Zhilian Huang; Aung Hein Aung; Wei-Yen Lim; Angela Chow
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2020-05-26       Impact factor: 5.428

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.