Literature DB >> 24338703

Role of novel and emerging oral anticoagulants for secondary prevention of acute coronary syndromes.

Valerie S Ganetsky1, Diane E Hadley, Tyan F Thomas.   

Abstract

Dual antiplatelet therapy has become a mainstay of long-term management of patients after an acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Mortality for these patients remains high despite current evidence-based treatment strategies. The coagulation cascade plays a role in the pathophysiology of ACS, and trials with warfarin in combination with dual antiplatelet therapy have found decreased rates of ischemic events at the expense of increased bleeding risk. Novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs) in the direct factor Xa (FXa) inhibitor and direct thrombin inhibitor (DTI) categories have been evaluated in combination with standard post-ACS therapy. Rivaroxaban, a FXa inhibitor, reduced the rates of ischemic events but increased major bleeding rates. Apixaban did not decrease the rates of ischemic events and also increased major bleeding rates. Other FXa inhibitors have not been studied in the long-term management of ACS (e.g., otamixaban), are not currently being studied in ongoing phase III trials (e.g., TAK-442), or have been discontinued by the manufacturer (e.g., darexaban). The DTI dabigatran had a 2- to 4-fold increased risk of major bleeding with unclear benefit for reducing ischemic events. The factor IXa inhibitor pegnivacogin is an RNA-based aptamer that has been studied in patients undergoing cardiac catheterization but has not been studied for long-term post-ACS management. The European Society of Cardiology Working Group on Thrombosis recommends the use of newer antiplatelet agents over addition of NOACs. Additional guidelines are available to guide management in patients requiring triple antithrombotic therapy but do not provide definitive recommendations on NOACs. Many questions remain about the place of NOACs for long-term post-ACS management. Recent trials have evaluated double versus triple antithrombotic therapy to balance efficacy and bleeding risk, but they did not include NOACs. It also remains unclear if NOACs hold a place in post-ACS therapy in the era of more potent antiplatelet agents such as prasugrel and ticagrelor.
© 2013 Pharmacotherapy Publications, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  acute coronary syndrome; anticoagulation; novel oral anticoagulant; oral anticoagulant; oral direct factor Xa inhibitor; oral direct thrombin inhibitor

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24338703     DOI: 10.1002/phar.1375

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacotherapy        ISSN: 0277-0008            Impact factor:   4.705


  4 in total

Review 1.  Bleeding in patients receiving non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants: clinical trial evidence.

Authors:  Arthur Bracey; Wassim Shatila; James Wilson
Journal:  Ther Adv Cardiovasc Dis       Date:  2018-09-30

2.  Current Antithrombotic Therapy in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndromes Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Interventions.

Authors:  Gabriele Pesarini; Sara Ariotti; Flavio Ribichini
Journal:  Interv Cardiol       Date:  2014-04

3.  Nonvitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs): the tide continues to come in.

Authors:  Andrew Blann
Journal:  Vasc Health Risk Manag       Date:  2015-08-20

4.  Optimal medical therapy for secondary prevention after an acute coronary syndrome: 18-month follow-up results at a tertiary teaching hospital in South Korea.

Authors:  Hee Ja Byeon; Young-Mo Yang; Eun Joo Choi
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2016-02-12       Impact factor: 2.423

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.