Literature DB >> 24338493

Cystatin C and serum creatinine as predictors of kidney graft outcome.

Visnja Lezaic1, Marijana Dajak, Dragana Radivojevic, Stojanka Ristic, Jelena Marinkovic.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Serum cystatin C (Cys C) was evaluated as a predictor of kidney graft failure progression, and its predictive ability was compared to other markers of graft function.
METHODS: The following kidney graft markers were determined in 91 patients who came for regular checkups of kidney graft function to our outpatient service in February 2008: Cys C, serum creatinine (sCr), 24-h proteinuria and 24-h urinary creatinine clearance (CCr). Glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was estimated using sCr-based and Cys C formula. Patients were regularly monitored until February 2013 or to graft failure.
RESULTS: During follow-up, graft failure occurred in 21 recipients. The Cys C ≥2.65 mg/l discriminated patients with and without graft failure (sensitivity of 80.95% and specificity of 92.86%). According to c statistic, the highest performance was achieved for Cys C (0.874). In addition, Cys C area under the curve (AUC) was significantly better than CCr AUC (p = 0.007), 24-h proteinuria AUC (p = 0.03), eGFR estimated by the chronic kidney disease epidemiology collaboration (EPI) AUC (p = 0.05), but not better than sCr or eGFR AUCs calculated by other formulas. In the multivariable model, sCr, CCr, Cys C and eGFRs were predictors of graft failure. Combination of Cys C, sCr and logarithm of 24 h proteinuria (0.883) or Cys C, CCr and logarithm of 24-h proteinuria (0.884) had the highest AUC for predicting graft outcome that exceed insignificantly Cys C or sCr areas.
CONCLUSIONS: The most reliable predictors of graft outcome were Cys C, sCr and proteinuria. Because Cys C is unavailable in many transplant centers, from the practical point of view, sCr remains the most sensitive predictor of graft outcome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24338493     DOI: 10.1007/s11255-013-0624-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol        ISSN: 0301-1623            Impact factor:   2.370


  30 in total

1.  New markers for kidney disease.

Authors:  Robert Star; Thomas Hostetter; Glen L Hortin
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 8.327

2.  Lack of improvement in renal allograft survival despite a marked decrease in acute rejection rates over the most recent era.

Authors:  Herwig-Ulf Meier-Kriesche; Jesse D Schold; Titte R Srinivas; Bruce Kaplan
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 8.086

3.  Early association of low-grade albuminuria and allograft dysfunction predicts renal transplant outcomes.

Authors:  Domingo Hernández; Germán Pérez; Domingo Marrero; Esteban Porrini; Margarita Rufino; José Manuel González-Posada; Patricia Delgado; Armando Torres
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2012-02-15       Impact factor: 4.939

4.  A predictive model for progression of chronic kidney disease to kidney failure.

Authors:  Navdeep Tangri; Lesley A Stevens; John Griffith; Hocine Tighiouart; Ognjenka Djurdjev; David Naimark; Adeera Levin; Andrew S Levey
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2011-04-11       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Detection of chronic kidney disease with creatinine, cystatin C, and urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio and association with progression to end-stage renal disease and mortality.

Authors:  Carmen A Peralta; Michael G Shlipak; Suzanne Judd; Mary Cushman; William McClellan; Neil A Zakai; Monika M Safford; Xiao Zhang; Paul Muntner; David Warnock
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2011-04-11       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 6.  Accuracy of cystatin C-based estimates of glomerular filtration rate in kidney transplant recipients: a systematic review.

Authors:  Gavin Harman; Ayub Akbari; Swapnil Hiremath; Christine A White; Tim Ramsay; Madzouka B Kokolo; Jeffery Craig; Greg A Knoll
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  2012-12-28       Impact factor: 5.992

7.  A clinical scoring system highly predictive of long-term kidney graft survival.

Authors:  Yohann Foucher; Pascal Daguin; Ahmed Akl; Michèle Kessler; Marc Ladrière; Christophe Legendre; Henri Kreis; Lionel Rostaing; Nassim Kamar; Georges Mourad; Valérie Garrigue; François Bayle; Bruno H de Ligny; Mathias Büchler; Carole Meier; Jean P Daurès; Jean-Paul Soulillou; Magali Giral
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2010-09-22       Impact factor: 10.612

8.  Renal biomarkers for assessment of kidney function in renal transplant recipients: how do they compare?

Authors:  Samra Abouchacra; Ahmed Chaaban; Raafat Hakim; Nicole Gebran; Hanan El-Jack; Faiz Rashid; Yousef Boobes; Amna Muhairi; Qutaiba Hussain; Imran Khan; Fares Chedid; Nico Negelkerke
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2012-05-26       Impact factor: 2.370

9.  Estimating glomerular filtration rate from serum creatinine and cystatin C.

Authors:  Lesley A Inker; Christopher H Schmid; Hocine Tighiouart; John H Eckfeldt; Harold I Feldman; Tom Greene; John W Kusek; Jane Manzi; Frederick Van Lente; Yaping Lucy Zhang; Josef Coresh; Andrew S Levey
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-07-05       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Cystatin C as a risk factor for outcomes in chronic kidney disease.

Authors:  Vandana Menon; Michael G Shlipak; Xuelei Wang; Josef Coresh; Tom Greene; Lesley Stevens; John W Kusek; Gerald J Beck; Allan J Collins; Andrew S Levey; Mark J Sarnak
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2007-07-03       Impact factor: 25.391

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Estimating glomerular filtration rate in kidney transplantation: Still searching for the best marker.

Authors:  Josefina Santos; La Salete Martins
Journal:  World J Nephrol       Date:  2015-07-06

2.  Filtration Markers, Cardiovascular Disease, Mortality, and Kidney Outcomes in Stable Kidney Transplant Recipients: The FAVORIT Trial.

Authors:  M C Foster; D E Weiner; A G Bostom; M A Carpenter; L A Inker; P Jarolim; A A Joseph; J W Kusek; T Pesavento; M A Pfeffer; M Rao; S D Solomon; A S Levey
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2017-03-30       Impact factor: 8.086

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.