Literature DB >> 24338435

Waist circumference and related anthropometric indices are associated with metabolic traits in severely obese subjects.

Runa Zazai1, Britta Wilms, Barbara Ernst, Martin Thurnheer, Bernd Schultes.   

Abstract

Increased waist circumference (WC) and related anthropometric indices have been shown to be, independently of body weight and body mass index (BMI), associated with adverse metabolic traits in many populations. It is unknown, however, whether WC also predicts adverse metabolic traits in severely obese subjects displaying a BMI greater than 35 kg/m2. To address this question, we analyzed a dataset including 838 severely obese patients (597 women, BMI 44.6 ± 6.2 kg/m2; 241 men, BMI 44.3 ± 5.7 kg/m2). Body weight, height, WC, hip circumference, and blood pressure were measured in all subjects along with the following metabolic blood markers: fasting glucose, insulin, glycolized hemoglobin levels, triglycerides, total cholesterol, low- and high-density cholesterol, and uric acid. Multivariate regression analyses indicated that WC as well as related anthropometric indices, in particular those accounting for subjects' height, were associated with many metabolic variables independently of body weight and BMI. In general, height-adjusted WC indices were more closely associated with metabolic traits in women than in men. Collectively, our findings suggest that body fat distribution also plays an important role in determining metabolic traits in severely obese subjects and that WC represents a valuable marker of abdominal/visceral obesity in this population.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24338435     DOI: 10.1007/s11695-013-1141-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obes Surg        ISSN: 0960-8923            Impact factor:   4.129


  21 in total

1.  BMI, waist circumference, and mortality according to health status in the older adult population of Spain.

Authors:  Pilar Guallar-Castillón; Teresa Balboa-Castillo; Esther López-García; Luz M León-Muñoz; Juan L Gutiérrez-Fisac; José R Banegas; Fernando Rodríguez-Artalejo
Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)       Date:  2009-04-09       Impact factor: 5.002

2.  Obesity: preventing and managing the global epidemic. Report of a WHO consultation.

Authors: 
Journal:  World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser       Date:  2000

Review 3.  A systematic review of waist-to-height ratio as a screening tool for the prediction of cardiovascular disease and diabetes: 0·5 could be a suitable global boundary value.

Authors:  Lucy M Browning; Shiun Dong Hsieh; Margaret Ashwell
Journal:  Nutr Res Rev       Date:  2010-09-07       Impact factor: 7.800

Review 4.  Waist-to-height ratio is a better screening tool than waist circumference and BMI for adult cardiometabolic risk factors: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  M Ashwell; P Gunn; S Gibson
Journal:  Obes Rev       Date:  2011-11-23       Impact factor: 9.213

5.  Surrogate markers of insulin resistance: A review.

Authors:  Bhawna Singh; Alpana Saxena
Journal:  World J Diabetes       Date:  2010-05-15

6.  Use of height3:waist circumference3 as an index for metabolic risk assessment?

Authors:  Anja Bosy-Westphal; Sandra Danielzik; Corinna Geisler; Simone Onur; Oliver Korth; Oliver Selberg; Maria Pfeuffer; Jürgen Schrezenmeir; Manfred J Müller
Journal:  Br J Nutr       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 3.718

7.  Waist to stature ratio is more strongly associated with cardiovascular risk factors than other simple anthropometric indices.

Authors:  Sai-Yin Ho; Tai-Hing Lam; Edward D Janus
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 3.797

8.  Waist circumference, waist-to-hip ratio and body mass index as predictors of adipose tissue compartments in men.

Authors:  D C Chan; G F Watts; P H R Barrett; V Burke
Journal:  QJM       Date:  2003-06

Review 9.  Metabolic obesity: the paradox between visceral and subcutaneous fat.

Authors:  Osama Hamdy; Sriurai Porramatikul; Ebaa Al-Ozairi
Journal:  Curr Diabetes Rev       Date:  2006-11

10.  Body adiposity index and cardiovascular health risk factors in Caucasians: a comparison with the body mass index and others.

Authors:  Miquel Bennasar-Veny; Angel A Lopez-Gonzalez; Pedro Tauler; Mey L Cespedes; Teofila Vicente-Herrero; Aina Yañez; Matias Tomas-Salva; Antoni Aguilo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-29       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  4 in total

1.  Emergent Anthropometric Indices in Differential Prediction of Prehypertension and Hypertension in Mexican Population: Results according to Age and Sex.

Authors:  Oscar Zaragoza-García; Ilse Adriana Gutiérrez-Pérez; Pedro Delgado-Floody; Isela Parra-Rojas; Daniel Jerez-Mayorga; Christian Campos-Jara; Iris Paola Guzmán-Guzmán
Journal:  Int J Hypertens       Date:  2022-07-07       Impact factor: 2.434

2.  The importance of waist circumference and body mass index in cross-sectional relationships with risk of cardiovascular disease in Vietnam.

Authors:  Nga Thi Thu Tran; Christopher Leigh Blizzard; Khue Ngoc Luong; Ngoc Le Van Truong; Bao Quoc Tran; Petr Otahal; Mark Nelson; Costan Magnussen; Seana Gall; Tan Van Bui; Velandai Srikanth; Thuy Bich Au; Son Thai Ha; Hai Ngoc Phung; Mai Hoang Tran; Michele Callisaya
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-05-29       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Waist, neck circumferences, waist-to-hip ratio: Which is the best cardiometabolic risk marker in women with severe obesity? The SOON cohort.

Authors:  Anne-Laure Borel; Sandrine Coumes; Fabian Reche; Stéphane Ruckly; Jean-Louis Pépin; Renaud Tamisier; Nelly Wion; Catherine Arvieux
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-11-08       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Correlation among Waist Circumference and Central Measures of Blood Pressure.

Authors:  Gilberto Campos Guimarães Filho; Lucas Tavares Silva; Ruth Mellina Castro E Silva
Journal:  Arq Bras Cardiol       Date:  2022-08       Impact factor: 2.667

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.