Literature DB >> 24338355

Association and dissociation between detection and discrimination of objects of expertise: Evidence from visual search.

Tal Golan1, Shlomo Bentin, Joseph M DeGutis, Lynn C Robertson, Assaf Harel.   

Abstract

Expertise in face recognition is characterized by high proficiency in distinguishing between individual faces. However, faces also enjoy an advantage at the early stage of basic-level detection, as demonstrated by efficient visual search for faces among nonface objects. In the present study, we asked (1) whether the face advantage in detection is a unique signature of face expertise, or whether it generalizes to other objects of expertise, and (2) whether expertise in face detection is intrinsically linked to expertise in face individuation. We compared how groups with varying degrees of object and face expertise (typical adults, developmental prosopagnosics [DP], and car experts) search for objects within and outside their domains of expertise (faces, cars, airplanes, and butterflies) among a variable set of object distractors. Across all three groups, search efficiency (indexed by reaction time slopes) was higher for faces and airplanes than for cars and butterflies. Notably, the search slope for car targets was considerably shallower in the car experts than in nonexperts. Although the mean face slope was slightly steeper among the DPs than in the other two groups, most of the DPs' search slopes were well within the normative range. This pattern of results suggests that expertise in object detection is indeed associated with expertise at the subordinate level, that it is not specific to faces, and that the two types of expertise are distinct facilities. We discuss the potential role of experience in bridging between low-level discriminative features and high-level naturalistic categories.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24338355     DOI: 10.3758/s13414-013-0562-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 1943-3921            Impact factor:   2.199


  8 in total

1.  Cognitive Expertise: An ALE Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Nicola Neumann; Martin Lotze; Simon B Eickhoff
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2015-10-14       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Target specificity improves search, but how universal is the benefit?

Authors:  Ashley M Ercolino; Pooja Patel; Corey Bohil; Mark B Neider; Joseph Schmidt
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2020-11       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Visual search efficiency is greater for human faces compared to animal faces.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Simpson; Haley L Husband; Krysten Yee; Alison Fullerton; Krisztina V Jakobsen
Journal:  Exp Psychol       Date:  2014

Review 4.  Beyond perceptual expertise: revisiting the neural substrates of expert object recognition.

Authors:  Assaf Harel; Dwight Kravitz; Chris I Baker
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-12-27       Impact factor: 3.169

5.  Monitoring Processes in Visual Search Enhanced by Professional Experience: The Case of Orange Quality-Control Workers.

Authors:  Antonino Visalli; Antonino Vallesi
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-02-14

6.  A Cross Modal Performance-Based Measure of Sensory Stimuli Intricacy.

Authors:  Kobi Snitz; Anat Arzi; Merav Jacobson; Lavi Secundo; Kineret Weissler; Adi Yablonka
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-02-03       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Personal distress and the influence of bystanders on responding to an emergency.

Authors:  Ruud Hortensius; Dennis J L G Schutter; Beatrice de Gelder
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 3.282

8.  Visual Search for Circumscribed Interests in Autism Is Similar to That of Neurotypical Individuals.

Authors:  Benjamin M Silver; Mary M Conte; Jonathan D Victor; Rebecca M Jones
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2020-10-21
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.