Literature DB >> 24337907

The contribution of private and public information in foraging by Australasian gannets.

Gabriel E Machovsky-Capuska1, Mark E Hauber, Eric Libby, Christophe Amiot, David Raubenheimer.   

Abstract

Predators that forage on foods with temporally and spatially patchy distributions may rely on private or public sources of information to enhance their chances of foraging success. Using GPS tracking, field observations, and videography, we examined potential sites and mechanisms of information acquisition in departures for foraging trips by colonially breeding Australasian gannets (Morus serrator). Analyses of the bill-fencing ceremony between mated pairs of breeding gannets did not detect correlations between parameters of this reciprocal behavior and foraging trips, as would have been predicted if gannets used this behavior as a source of private information. Instead, 60% of the departing birds flew directly to join water rafts of other conspecific en route to the feeding grounds. The departure of solitary birds from the water rafts was synchronized (within 60 s) with the arrival of incoming foragers and also among departing birds. Furthermore, solitary departing birds from the rafts left in the same directional quadrant (90º slices) as the prior arriving (67%) and also prior departing forager (79%). When associated plunge dives of conspecific were visible from the colony, providing a public source of information, gannets more often departed from the water rafts in groups. Our study thus provides evidence for the use of water rafts, but not the nest site, as locations of information transfer, and also confirms the use of local enhancement as a strategy for foraging flights by Australasian gannets.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24337907     DOI: 10.1007/s10071-013-0716-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anim Cogn        ISSN: 1435-9448            Impact factor:   3.084


  7 in total

1.  Evidence of sociality in the timing and location of foraging in a colonial seabird.

Authors:  Teri B Jones; Samantha C Patrick; John P Y Arnould; Marlenne A Rodríguez-Malagón; Melanie R Wells; Jonathan A Green
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 3.703

2.  Seabird diving behaviour reveals the functional significance of shelf-sea fronts as foraging hotspots.

Authors:  S L Cox; P I Miller; C B Embling; K L Scales; A W J Bicknell; P J Hosegood; G Morgan; S N Ingram; S C Votier
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2016-09-21       Impact factor: 2.963

3.  Group foraging in Socotra cormorants: A biologging approach to the study of a complex behavior.

Authors:  Timothée R Cook; Rob Gubiani; Peter G Ryan; Sabir B Muzaffar
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-02-26       Impact factor: 2.912

4.  Inter-individual differences in foraging tactics of a colonial raptor: consistency, weather effects, and fitness correlates.

Authors:  Jacopo G Cecere; Federico De Pascalis; Simona Imperio; Delphine Ménard; Carlo Catoni; Matteo Griggio; Diego Rubolini
Journal:  Mov Ecol       Date:  2020-06-24       Impact factor: 3.600

5.  Eating locally: Australasian gannets increase their foraging effort in a restricted range.

Authors:  Lauren P Angel; Sophie Barker; Maud Berlincourt; Emma Tew; Victoria Warwick-Evans; John P Y Arnould
Journal:  Biol Open       Date:  2015-09-14       Impact factor: 2.422

6.  Spatial segregation of home ranges between neighbouring colonies in a diurnal raptor.

Authors:  Jacopo G Cecere; Salvatore Bondì; Stefano Podofillini; Simona Imperio; Matteo Griggio; Egidio Fulco; Andrea Curcio; Delphine Ménard; Ugo Mellone; Nicola Saino; Lorenzo Serra; Maurizio Sarà; Diego Rubolini
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-08-06       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Manx shearwater (Puffinus puffinus) rafting behaviour revealed by GPS tracking and behavioural observations.

Authors:  Cerren Richards; Oliver Padget; Tim Guilford; Amanda E Bates
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2019-10-21       Impact factor: 2.984

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.