Literature DB >> 24337776

Message framing strategies to increase influenza immunization uptake among pregnant African American women.

Heather A Marsh1, Fauzia Malik, Eve Shapiro, Saad B Omer, Paula M Frew.   

Abstract

We explored the attitudes, opinions, and concerns of African American women regarding influenza vaccination during pregnancy. As influenza immunization coverage rates remain suboptimal in the United States among this population, we elicited message framing strategies for multicomponent interventions aimed at decreasing future incident cases of maternal and neonatal influenza. Semi-structured in-depth interviews (N = 21) were conducted with pregnant African American women at urban OB/GYN clinics who had not received an influenza vaccine. Interviews were transcribed, subjected to intercoder reliability assessment, and content analyzed to identify common thematic factors related to acceptance of the influenza vaccine and health communication message preferences. Four major themes were identified. These were communication approaches, normal vaccine behavior, pregnancy vaccination, and positive versus negative framing. Two strong themes emerged: positively-framed messages were preferred over negatively-framed messages and those emphasizing the health of the infant. Additionally, previous immunization, message source, and vaccine misperceptions also played important roles in decision-making. The majority of women indicated that positively framed messages focusing on the infant's health would encourage them to receive an influenza vaccine. Messages emphasizing immunization benefits such as protection against preterm birth and low birth weight outcomes have potential to overcome widespread negative community perceptions and cultural beliefs. Additionally, messages transmitted via interpersonal networks and social media strongly influence motivation to obtain vaccination during pregnancy. The findings of this study will assist in developing tailored messages that change pregnant African American women's influenza vaccination decision-making to achieve improved coverage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24337776     DOI: 10.1007/s10995-013-1404-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Matern Child Health J        ISSN: 1092-7875


  34 in total

1.  Perceptions of pandemic influenza vaccines.

Authors:  Cecile A Marczinski
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  The public's response to the 2009 H1N1 influenza pandemic.

Authors:  Gillian K SteelFisher; Robert J Blendon; Mark M Bekheit; Keri Lubell
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2010-05-19       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Novel pandemic A (H1N1) influenza vaccination among pregnant women: motivators and barriers.

Authors:  Gillian K Steelfisher; Robert J Blendon; Mark M Bekheit; Elizabeth W Mitchell; Jennifer Williams; Keri Lubell; Jordon Peugh; Charles A DiSogra
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2011-04-14       Impact factor: 8.661

4.  Influenza vaccination coverage among pregnant women: 2011-12 influenza season, United States.

Authors: 
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  2012-09-28       Impact factor: 17.586

5.  Exploring pregnant women's views on influenza vaccination and educational text messages.

Authors:  Elyse Olshen Kharbanda; Celibell Y Vargas; Paula M Castaño; Marcos Lara; Raquel Andres; Melissa S Stockwell
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2010-11-01       Impact factor: 4.018

6.  Public health response to influenza A(H1N1) as an opportunity to build public trust.

Authors:  Heidi J Larson; David L Heymann
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2010-01-20       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Qualitative study to explore Prospect Theory and message framing and diet and cancer prevention-related issues among African American adolescents.

Authors:  Jessie A Satia; Jameta Barlow; Janelle Armstrong-Brown; Joanne L Watters
Journal:  Cancer Nurs       Date:  2010 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.592

8.  Correlates of seasonal influenza vaccine coverage among pregnant women in Georgia and Rhode Island.

Authors:  Indu B Ahluwalia; Denise J Jamieson; Sonja A Rasmussen; Denise D'Angelo; David Goodman; Hanna Kim
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 7.661

9.  Perceived susceptibility to breast cancer moderates the effect of gain- and loss-framed messages on use of screening mammography.

Authors:  Kristel M Gallagher; John A Updegraff; Alexander J Rothman; Linda Sims
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 4.267

10.  Influenza-associated hospitalizations in the United States.

Authors:  William W Thompson; David K Shay; Eric Weintraub; Lynnette Brammer; Carolyn B Bridges; Nancy J Cox; Keiji Fukuda
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2004-09-15       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  21 in total

1.  Development and acceptability of a video-based vaccine promotion tutorial for obstetric care providers.

Authors:  A T Chamberlain; R J Limaye; S T O'Leary; P M Frew; S E Brewer; C I Spina; M K Ellingson; M Z Dudley; W A Orenstein; M A Donnelly; L E Riley; K A Ault; D A Salmon; S B Omer
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2019-04-05       Impact factor: 3.641

2.  Commentary on "Moniz and Beigi's maternal immunization: clinical experiences, challenges, and opportunities in vaccine acceptance".

Authors:  Paula M Frew
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2014-11-13       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 3.  Maternal immunization. Clinical experiences, challenges, and opportunities in vaccine acceptance.

Authors:  Michelle H Moniz; Richard H Beigi
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2014-10-30       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  Recruitment and retention of pregnant women into clinical research trials: an overview of challenges, facilitators, and best practices.

Authors:  Paula M Frew; Diane S Saint-Victor; Margaret Brewinski Isaacs; Sonnie Kim; Geeta K Swamy; Jeanne S Sheffield; Kathryn M Edwards; Tonya Villafana; Ouda Kamagate; Kevin Ault
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2014-12-15       Impact factor: 9.079

Review 5.  Enhancing uptake of influenza maternal vaccine.

Authors:  Mallory K Ellingson; Matthew Z Dudley; Rupali J Limaye; Daniel A Salmon; Sean T O'Leary; Saad B Omer
Journal:  Expert Rev Vaccines       Date:  2019-01-28       Impact factor: 5.217

Review 6.  Interventions to increase pediatric vaccine uptake: An overview of recent findings.

Authors:  Paula M Frew; Chelsea S Lutz
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2017-09-26       Impact factor: 3.452

7.  Impact of a multi-component antenatal vaccine promotion package on improving knowledge, attitudes and beliefs about influenza and Tdap vaccination during pregnancy.

Authors:  Allison T Chamberlain; Katherine Seib; Kevin A Ault; Eli S Rosenberg; Paula M Frew; Marielysse Cortes; Ellen A S Whitney; Ruth L Berkelman; Walter A Orenstein; Saad B Omer
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2016-04-15       Impact factor: 3.452

8.  Vaccination in pregnancy: Attitudes of nurses, midwives and health visitors in England.

Authors:  Bhavita Vishram; Louise Letley; Albert Jan Van Hoek; Louise Silverton; Helen Donovan; Cheryll Adams; David Green; Angela Edwards; Joanne Yarwood; Helen Bedford; Gayatri Amirthalingam; Helen Campbell
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2017-11-27       Impact factor: 3.452

9.  Factors associated with maternal influenza immunization decision-making. Evidence of immunization history and message framing effects.

Authors:  Paula M Frew; Lauren E Owens; Diane S Saint-Victor; Samantha Benedict; Siyu Zhang; Saad B Omer
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2014-11-06       Impact factor: 3.452

10.  Social Media and Evidence-Based Maternity Care: A Cross-Sectional Survey Study.

Authors:  Rebecca L Dekker; Sarah King; Kara Lester
Journal:  J Perinat Educ       Date:  2016
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.