Literature DB >> 24337558

Evolution and impact of eye and vision terms in written English.

Christopher T Leffler1, Stephen G Schwartz2, Russell Stackhouse1, Byrd Davenport1, Karli Spetzler1.   

Abstract

With this article, we aimed to trace the evolution and impact of eye-related terms common in written English during the past 2 centuries by studying digital resources. Eye-related words and phrases (n-grams) occurring in English books at a frequency of 0.00001% for at least 25 years between 1790 and 2008 were identified from the Google n-gram database by searching for 254 strings such as eye or ophth. The first known English use of these n-grams was identified from historical articles and from multiple digital resources. Eye color was not commonly described as brown or green before 1840. Many common bigrams, such as bright eyes, suggested light emanating from the eyes, consistent with the extramission theory of vision. Based on word frequency, the impact of the revolutionary 1850 ophthalmoscope exceeded that of the stethoscope for 60 years. Glaucoma was not commonly written until the ophthalmoscope permitted visualization of the characteristic optic neuropathy. Green spectacles gave way during the early 1900s to dark glasses, subsequently renamed sunglasses. Until the mid-1900s, an eye surgeon was more often described as an oculist than an ophthalmologist, and inflamed eyes were said to experience ophthalmia more often than uveitis. Macular degeneration was rarely written about for more than a century after 1850 because it was labeled choroiditis. Of the 135 n-grams in the dictionary, an earlier written instance was identified in 92 cases (68%). Online databases of the written word reveal the origin and impact of many important vision concepts.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24337558     DOI: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2013.917

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Ophthalmol        ISSN: 2168-6165            Impact factor:   7.389


  8 in total

Review 1.  Ophthalmology in North America: Early Stories (1491-1801).

Authors:  Christopher T Leffler; Stephen G Schwartz; Ricardo D Wainsztein; Adam Pflugrath; Eric Peterson
Journal:  Ophthalmol Eye Dis       Date:  2017-07-26

2.  Uses of the word "macula" in written English, 1400-present.

Authors:  Stephen G Schwartz; Christopher T Leffler
Journal:  Surv Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-03-28       Impact factor: 6.048

3.  The first cataract surgeons in Anglo-America.

Authors:  Christopher T Leffler; Stephen G Schwartz; Andrzej Grzybowski; Puneet S Braich
Journal:  Surv Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-08-20       Impact factor: 6.048

4.  What was Glaucoma Called Before the 20th Century?

Authors:  Christopher T Leffler; Stephen G Schwartz; Francesca M Giliberti; Matthew T Young; Dennis Bermudez
Journal:  Ophthalmol Eye Dis       Date:  2015-10-08

5.  Enduring influence of elizabethan ophthalmic texts of the 1580s: bailey, grassus, and guillemeau.

Authors:  Christopher T Leffler; Stephen G Schwartz; Byrd Davenport; Jessica Randolph; Joshua Busscher; Tamer Hadi
Journal:  Open Ophthalmol J       Date:  2014-05-30

Review 6.  The early history of glaucoma: the glaucous eye (800 BC to 1050 AD).

Authors:  Christopher T Leffler; Stephen G Schwartz; Tamer M Hadi; Ali Salman; Vivek Vasuki
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-02-02

Review 7.  A Family of Early English Oculists (1600-1751), With a Reappraisal of John Thomas Woolhouse (1664-1733/1734).

Authors:  Christopher T Leffler; Stephen G Schwartz
Journal:  Ophthalmol Eye Dis       Date:  2017-09-29

Review 8.  A medieval fallacy: the crystalline lens in the center of the eye.

Authors:  Christopher T Leffler; Tamer M Hadi; Akrithi Udupa; Stephen G Schwartz; Daniel Schwartz
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-04-08
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.