PURPOSE: Pharmacokinetics and effects on skeletal muscle and physical performance of oral acetylcarnitine and propionylcarnitine are not well characterized. We therefore investigated the influence of oral acetylcarnitine, propionylcarnitine, and carnitine on body carnitine homeostasis, energy metabolism, and physical performance in mice and compared the findings to non-supplemented control animals. METHODS: Mice were supplemented orally with 2 mmol/kg/day carnitine, acetylcarnitine, or propionylcarnitine for 4 weeks and studied either at rest or after exhaustive exercise. RESULTS: In the supplemented groups, total plasma and urine carnitine concentrations were significantly higher than in the control group receiving no carnitine, whereas the skeletal muscle carnitine content remained unchanged. The supplemented acylcarnitines were hydrolyzed in intestine and liver and reached the systemic circulation as carnitine. Bioavailability of carnitine and acylcarnitines, determined as the urinary excretion of total carnitine, was in the range of 19 %. Skeletal muscle morphology, including fiber-type composition, was not affected, and oxygen consumption by soleus or gastrocnemius fibers was not different between the groups. Supplementation with carnitine or acylcarnitines had no significant impact on the running capacity, but was associated with lower plasma lactate levels and a higher glycogen content in white skeletal muscle after exhaustive exercise. CONCLUSIONS: Oral supplementation of carnitine, acetylcarnitine, or propionylcarnitine in mice is associated with increased plasma and urine total carnitine concentrations, but does not affect the skeletal muscle carnitine content. Despite better preservation of skeletal muscle glycogen and lower plasma lactate levels, physical performance was not improved by carnitine or acylcarnitine supplementation.
PURPOSE: Pharmacokinetics and effects on skeletal muscle and physical performance of oral acetylcarnitine and propionylcarnitine are not well characterized. We therefore investigated the influence of oral acetylcarnitine, propionylcarnitine, and carnitine on body carnitine homeostasis, energy metabolism, and physical performance in mice and compared the findings to non-supplemented control animals. METHODS:Mice were supplemented orally with 2 mmol/kg/day carnitine, acetylcarnitine, or propionylcarnitine for 4 weeks and studied either at rest or after exhaustive exercise. RESULTS: In the supplemented groups, total plasma and urine carnitine concentrations were significantly higher than in the control group receiving no carnitine, whereas the skeletal muscle carnitine content remained unchanged. The supplemented acylcarnitines were hydrolyzed in intestine and liver and reached the systemic circulation as carnitine. Bioavailability of carnitine and acylcarnitines, determined as the urinary excretion of total carnitine, was in the range of 19 %. Skeletal muscle morphology, including fiber-type composition, was not affected, and oxygen consumption by soleus or gastrocnemius fibers was not different between the groups. Supplementation with carnitine or acylcarnitines had no significant impact on the running capacity, but was associated with lower plasma lactate levels and a higher glycogen content in white skeletal muscle after exhaustive exercise. CONCLUSIONS: Oral supplementation of carnitine, acetylcarnitine, or propionylcarnitine in mice is associated with increased plasma and urine total carnitine concentrations, but does not affect the skeletal muscle carnitine content. Despite better preservation of skeletal muscle glycogen and lower plasma lactate levels, physical performance was not improved by carnitine or acylcarnitine supplementation.
Authors: Francis B Stephens; Dumitru Constantin-Teodosiu; David Laithwaite; Elizabeth J Simpson; Paul L Greenhaff Journal: FASEB J Date: 2005-12-20 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Sandra Wächter; Michael Vogt; Roland Kreis; Chris Boesch; Peter Bigler; Hans Hoppeler; Stephan Krähenbühl Journal: Clin Chim Acta Date: 2002-04 Impact factor: 3.786
Authors: Benjamin T Wall; Francis B Stephens; Dumitru Constantin-Teodosiu; Kanagaraj Marimuthu; Ian A Macdonald; Paul L Greenhaff Journal: J Physiol Date: 2011-01-04 Impact factor: 5.182
Authors: R Huertas; Y Campos; E Díaz; J Esteban; L Vechietti; G Montanari; S D'Iddio; M Corsi; J Arenas Journal: Biochem Biophys Res Commun Date: 1992-10-15 Impact factor: 3.575
Authors: S Oyono-Enguelle; H Freund; C Ott; M Gartner; A Heitz; J Marbach; F Maccari; A Frey; H Bigot; A C Bach Journal: Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol Date: 1988
Authors: Gareth Davison; Maria Vinaixa; Rose McGovern; Antoni Beltran; Anna Novials; Xavier Correig; Conor McClean Journal: Front Physiol Date: 2018-11-26 Impact factor: 4.566
Authors: Jessica L Sea; Etan Orgel; Ting Chen; Rebecca L Paszkiewicz; Abigail S Krall; Matthew J Oberley; Linsey Stiles; Steven D Mittelman Journal: Leuk Lymphoma Date: 2019-09-16