Literature DB >> 24336477

Comparison of mulligan sustained natural apophyseal glides and maitland mobilizations for treatment of cervicogenic dizziness: a randomized controlled trial.

Susan A Reid1, Darren A Rivett, Michael G Katekar, Robin Callister.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is short-term evidence for treatment of cervicogenic dizziness with Mulligan sustained natural apophyseal glides (SNAGs) but no evidence for treatment with Maitland mobilizations.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of SNAGs and Maitland mobilizations for cervicogenic dizziness.
DESIGN: A double-blind, parallel-arm randomized controlled trial was conducted.
SETTING: The study was conducted at a university in Newcastle, Australia. PARTICIPANTS: Eighty-six people with cervicogenic dizziness were the study participants.
INTERVENTIONS: Included participants were randomly allocated to receive 1 of 3 interventions: Mulligan SNAGs (including self-administered SNAGs), Maitland mobilizations plus range-of-motion exercises, or placebo. MEASUREMENTS: The primary outcome measure was intensity of dizziness. Other outcome measures were: frequency of dizziness, the Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI), intensity of pain, and global perceived effect (GPE).
RESULTS: Both manual therapy groups had reduced dizziness intensity and frequency posttreatment and at 12 weeks compared with baseline. There was no change in the placebo group. Both manual therapy groups had less dizziness intensity posttreatment (SNAGs: mean difference=-20.7, 95% confidence interval [95% CI]=-33.6, -7.7; mobilizations: mean difference=-15.2, 95% CI=-27.9, -2.4) and at 12 weeks (SNAGs: mean difference=-18.4, 95% CI=-31.3, -5.4; mobilizations: mean difference=-14.4, 95% CI=-27.4, -1.5) compared with the placebo group. Compared with the placebo group, both the SNAG and Maitland mobilization groups had less frequency of dizziness at 12 weeks. There were no differences between the 2 manual therapy interventions for these dizziness measures. For DHI and pain, all 3 groups improved posttreatment and at 12 weeks. Both manual therapy groups reported a higher GPE compared with the placebo group. There were no treatment-related adverse effects lasting longer than 24 hours. LIMITATIONS: The therapist performing the interventions was not blind to group allocation.
CONCLUSIONS: Both SNAGs and Maitland mobilizations provide comparable immediate and sustained (12 weeks) reductions in intensity and frequency of chronic cervicogenic dizziness.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24336477     DOI: 10.2522/ptj.20120483

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Ther        ISSN: 0031-9023


  24 in total

1.  Is there a role for neck manipulation in elderly falls prevention? - An overview.

Authors:  Julie C Kendall; Jan Hartvigsen; Simon D French; Michael F Azari
Journal:  J Can Chiropr Assoc       Date:  2015-03

2.  Effectiveness of a "Spring Pillow" Versus Education in Chronic Nonspecific Neck Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Carla Vanti; Federico Banchelli; Claudia Marino; Andrea Puccetti; Andrew A Guccione; Paolo Pillastrini
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2019-09-01

3.  A CONCEPTUAL MODEL FOR PHYSICAL THERAPISTS TREATING ATHLETES WITH PROTRACTED RECOVERY FOLLOWING A CONCUSSION.

Authors:  Mark Lundblad
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2017-04

4.  Headache symptom modification: the relevance of appropriate manual therapy assessment and management of a patient with features of migraine and cervicogenic headache - a case report.

Authors:  Kiran Satpute; Nilima Bedekar; Toby Hall
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2019-09-20

5.  The reliability of the cervical relocation test on people with and without a history of neck pain.

Authors:  Sarah Burke; Kristina Lynch; Zakkee Moghul; Craig Young; Kristen Saviola; Ron Schenk
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2016-09

6.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of the therapeutic management of patients with cervicogenic dizziness.

Authors:  Charlotte De Vestel; Luc Vereeck; Susan A Reid; Vincent Van Rompaey; Joris Lemmens; Willem De Hertogh
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2022-04-06

7.  Therapeutic patient education and exercise therapy in patients with cervicogenic dizziness: a prospective case series clinical study.

Authors:  Ana Minguez-Zuazo; Mónica Grande-Alonso; Beatriz Moral Saiz; Roy La Touche; Sergio Lerma Lara
Journal:  J Exerc Rehabil       Date:  2016-06-30

8.  Effects of local treatment with and without sensorimotor and balance exercise in individuals with neck pain: protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Munlika Sremakaew; Gwendolen Jull; Julia Treleaven; Marco Barbero; Deborah Falla; Sureeporn Uthaikhup
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2018-02-13       Impact factor: 2.362

9.  A Herbal Medicine, Gongjindan, in Subjects with Chronic Dizziness (GOODNESS Study): Study Protocol for a Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Group, Clinical Trial for Effectiveness, Safety, and Cost-Effectiveness.

Authors:  Seungwon Shin; Jinyoung Kim; Ami Yu; Hyung-Sik Seo; Mi-Ran Shin; Jae-Heung Cho; Gilhee Yi; Seung-Ug Hong; Euiju Lee
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2017-12-13       Impact factor: 2.629

10.  The effectiveness of manual therapy in treating cervicogenic dizziness: a systematic review.

Authors:  Khalid Yaseen; Paul Hendrick; Ayah Ismail; Mohannad Felemban; Mansour Abdullah Alshehri
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2018-01-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.