Catherine Brawn Fortier1, Melissa M Amick, Alexandra Kenna, William P Milberg, Regina E McGlinchey. 1. Translational Research Center for TBI and Stress Disorders (TRACTS), VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, Massachusetts (Drs Fortier, Amick, Kenna, Milberg, and McGlinchey); Geriatric Research, Education and Clinical Center (GRECC), VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, Massachusetts (Drs Fortier, Milberg, and McGlinchey); Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts (Drs Fortier, Milberg, and McGlinchey); and Department of Psychiatry, Boston University Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts (Dr Amick).
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Mild traumatic brain injury is the signature injury of Operation Enduring Freedom (OEF), Operation Iraqi Freedom (OIF), and Operation New Dawn (OND), yet its identification and diagnosis is controversial and fraught with challenges. SETTING: In 2007, the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) implemented a policy requiring traumatic brain injury (TBI) screening on all individuals returning from deployment in the OEF/OIF/OND theaters of operation that lead to the rapid and widespread use of the VA TBI screen. The Boston Assessment of TBI-Lifetime (BAT-L) is the first validated, postcombat semistructured clinical interview to characterize head injuries and diagnose TBIs throughout the life span, including prior to, during, and post-military service. PARTICIPANTS: Community-dwelling convenience sample of 179 OEF/OIF/OND veterans. MAIN MEASURES: BAT-L, VA TBI screen. RESULTS: Based on BAT-L diagnosis of military TBI, the VA TBI screen demonstrated similar sensitivity (0.85) and specificity (0.82) when administered by research staff. When BAT-L diagnosis was compared with historical clinician-administered VA TBI screen in a subset of participants, sensitivity was reduced. CONCLUSIONS: The specificity of the research-administered VA TBI screen was more than adequate. The sensitivity of the VA TBI screen, although relatively high, suggests that it does not oversample or "catch all" possible military TBIs. Traumatic brain injuries identified by the BAT-L, but not identified by the VA TBI screen, were predominantly noncombat military injuries. There is potential concern regarding the validity and reliability of the clinician administered VA TBI screen, as we found poor correspondence between it and the BAT-L, as well as low interrater reliability between the clinician-administered and research-administered screen.
OBJECTIVE: Mild traumatic brain injury is the signature injury of Operation Enduring Freedom (OEF), Operation Iraqi Freedom (OIF), and Operation New Dawn (OND), yet its identification and diagnosis is controversial and fraught with challenges. SETTING: In 2007, the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) implemented a policy requiring traumatic brain injury (TBI) screening on all individuals returning from deployment in the OEF/OIF/OND theaters of operation that lead to the rapid and widespread use of the VA TBI screen. The Boston Assessment of TBI-Lifetime (BAT-L) is the first validated, postcombat semistructured clinical interview to characterize head injuries and diagnose TBIs throughout the life span, including prior to, during, and post-military service. PARTICIPANTS: Community-dwelling convenience sample of 179 OEF/OIF/OND veterans. MAIN MEASURES: BAT-L, VA TBI screen. RESULTS: Based on BAT-L diagnosis of military TBI, the VA TBI screen demonstrated similar sensitivity (0.85) and specificity (0.82) when administered by research staff. When BAT-L diagnosis was compared with historical clinician-administered VA TBI screen in a subset of participants, sensitivity was reduced. CONCLUSIONS: The specificity of the research-administered VA TBI screen was more than adequate. The sensitivity of the VA TBI screen, although relatively high, suggests that it does not oversample or "catch all" possible military TBIs. Traumatic brain injuries identified by the BAT-L, but not identified by the VA TBI screen, were predominantly noncombat military injuries. There is potential concern regarding the validity and reliability of the clinician administered VA TBI screen, as we found poor correspondence between it and the BAT-L, as well as low interrater reliability between the clinician-administered and research-administered screen.
Authors: Heather G Belanger; Rodney D Vanderploeg; Jason R Soble; Matthew Richardson; Shirley Groer Journal: Arch Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2012-03-15 Impact factor: 3.966
Authors: Kerry T Donnelly; James P Donnelly; Mina Dunnam; Gary C Warner; C J Kittleson; Janet E Constance; Charles B Bradshaw; Michelle Alt Journal: J Head Trauma Rehabil Date: 2011 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 2.710
Authors: Catherine Brawn Fortier; Melissa M Amick; Laura Grande; Susan McGlynn; Alexandra Kenna; Lindsay Morra; Alexandra Clark; William P Milberg; Regina E McGlinchey Journal: J Head Trauma Rehabil Date: 2014 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 2.710
Authors: Shayna J Fink; Delaney K Davey; McKenna S Sakamoto; Catherine Chanfreau-Coffinier; Alexandra L Clark; Lisa Delano-Wood; Victoria C Merritt Journal: J Psychiatr Res Date: 2022-04-21 Impact factor: 5.250
Authors: Alexandra L Clark; Scott F Sorg; Dawn M Schiehser; Erin D Bigler; Mark W Bondi; Mark W Jacobson; Amy J Jak; Lisa Delano-Wood Journal: J Head Trauma Rehabil Date: 2016 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 2.710
Authors: Regina E McGlinchey; William P Milberg; Jennifer R Fonda; Catherine Brawn Fortier Journal: Int J Methods Psychiatr Res Date: 2017-02-17 Impact factor: 4.035
Authors: Francesca C Fortenbaugh; Jennifer A Gustafson; Jennifer R Fonda; Catherine B Fortier; William P Milberg; Regina E McGlinchey Journal: Vision Res Date: 2021-05-14 Impact factor: 1.984
Authors: Erin D Ozturk; Catherine Chanfreau-Coffinier; McKenna S Sakamoto; Lisa Delano-Wood; Victoria C Merritt Journal: J Psychiatr Res Date: 2021-12-14 Impact factor: 5.250
Authors: Lauren J Radigan; Regina E McGlinchey; William P Milberg; Catherine Brawn Fortier Journal: J Head Trauma Rehabil Date: 2018 Sep/Oct Impact factor: 2.710