BACKGROUND: Optimal timing in the treatment of intracranial hemangioblastoma (HB) remains controversial, particularly for patients of von Hippel-Lindau disease (VHL) with multiple small lesions. We evaluated efficacy of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for intracranial HB based on the longer follow-up data with a larger number of patients and lesions. METHODS: Twenty-one patients (11 men, 10 women) initially underwent SRS for 57 intracranial HBs. Seven patients had sporadic lesions and 14 had VHL-related lesions. During the follow-up, 40 lesions were additionally treated in VHL patients in 10 SRS treatments. Thus, a total of 97 lesions were included in this study. Median tumor volume was 0.13 cm(3) (range, 0.004-9.5 cm(3)), and median margin dose was 18 Gy (range, 14-20 Gy). RESULTS: Median duration of follow-up was 96 months (range, 3-235 mo) after initial SRS treatment. Ten tumors in 7 patients showed progression after SRS. Actuarial tumor control rates after SRS at 5 and 10 years were 94% and 80%, respectively. Factors associated with longer control were solid lesion (P = .03), smaller volume (P = .01), and lesions associated with VHL (P = .0005) in univariate analysis. Five- and 10-year tumor control rates were 67% and 44% for sporadic patients and 97% and 83% for VHL patients. CONCLUSION: SRS could be offered as an effective treatment for small, solid, and VHL-associated HBs. If the tumors show apparent enlargement in size or can possibly become symptomatic along with a slight increase in size, SRS should be recommended before they present with the clinical symptoms.
BACKGROUND: Optimal timing in the treatment of intracranial hemangioblastoma (HB) remains controversial, particularly for patients of von Hippel-Lindau disease (VHL) with multiple small lesions. We evaluated efficacy of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for intracranial HB based on the longer follow-up data with a larger number of patients and lesions. METHODS: Twenty-one patients (11 men, 10 women) initially underwent SRS for 57 intracranial HBs. Seven patients had sporadic lesions and 14 had VHL-related lesions. During the follow-up, 40 lesions were additionally treated in VHLpatients in 10 SRS treatments. Thus, a total of 97 lesions were included in this study. Median tumor volume was 0.13 cm(3) (range, 0.004-9.5 cm(3)), and median margin dose was 18 Gy (range, 14-20 Gy). RESULTS: Median duration of follow-up was 96 months (range, 3-235 mo) after initial SRS treatment. Ten tumors in 7 patients showed progression after SRS. Actuarial tumor control rates after SRS at 5 and 10 years were 94% and 80%, respectively. Factors associated with longer control were solid lesion (P = .03), smaller volume (P = .01), and lesions associated with VHL (P = .0005) in univariate analysis. Five- and 10-year tumor control rates were 67% and 44% for sporadic patients and 97% and 83% for VHLpatients. CONCLUSION: SRS could be offered as an effective treatment for small, solid, and VHL-associated HBs. If the tumors show apparent enlargement in size or can possibly become symptomatic along with a slight increase in size, SRS should be recommended before they present with the clinical symptoms.
Authors: Charles B Simone; Russell R Lonser; John Ondos; Edward H Oldfield; Kevin Camphausen; Nicole L Simone Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2011-07-28 Impact factor: 12.300
Authors: Ashok R Asthagiri; Gautam U Mehta; Leor Zach; Xiaobai Li; John A Butman; Kevin A Camphausen; Russell R Lonser Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2009-12-23 Impact factor: 12.300
Authors: H P Neumann; D P Berger; G Sigmund; U Blum; D Schmidt; R J Parmer; B Volk; G Kirste Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1993-11-18 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: S R Smalley; P J Schomberg; J D Earle; E R Laws; B W Scheithauer; J R O'Fallon Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 1990-05 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Jason M Moss; Clara Y H Choi; John R Adler; Scott G Soltys; Iris C Gibbs; Steven D Chang Journal: Neurosurgery Date: 2009-07 Impact factor: 4.654
Authors: Russell R Lonser; Gladys M Glenn; McClellan Walther; Emily Y Chew; Steven K Libutti; W Marston Linehan; Edward H Oldfield Journal: Lancet Date: 2003-06-14 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Rupesh Kotecha; Minesh P Mehta; Eric L Chang; Paul D Brown; John H Suh; Simon S Lo; Sunit Das; Haider H Samawi; Julia Keith; James Perry; Arjun Sahgal Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2019-06-10 Impact factor: 12.300
Authors: Taekmin Kwon; In Gab Jeong; Sahyun Pak; Dalsan You; Cheryn Song; Jun Hyuk Hong; Hanjong Ahn; Choung-Soo Kim Journal: J Cancer Res Clin Oncol Date: 2014-03-27 Impact factor: 4.553
Authors: Z Zibly; Z R Cohen; A Peled; L Zach; U Nissim; Moshe Attia; Christian Graves; K Camphausen; R Spiegelman Journal: J Clin Neurosci Date: 2020-11-11 Impact factor: 1.961
Authors: Brittany Liebenow; Abigail Tatter; William A Dezarn; Scott Isom; Michael D Chan; Stephen B Tatter Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2019-02-07 Impact factor: 4.130
Authors: Yuqian Huang; Lilian Chan; Harrison X Bai; Xuejun Li; Zishu Zhang; Yinyan Wang; Ya Cao; Giorgos Karakousis; Raymond Huang; Bo Xiao; Paul J Zhang; Li Yang Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2018-07-24 Impact factor: 4.379