Qian An1, Helen L Fillmore, Mikaella Vouri, Geoffrey J Pilkington. 1. Corresponding Author: Dr. Qian An, MD, PhD, School of Pharmacy and Biomedical Sciences, University of Portsmouth, St Michael's Building, White Swan Road, Portsmouth PO1 2DT, UK. qian.an@port.ac.uk.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The current method for cell line authentication is genotyping based on short tandem repeat (STR)-PCR involving coamplification of a panel of STR loci by multiplex PCR and downstream fragment length analysis (FLA), usually performed by capillary electrophoresis. FLA by capillary electrophoresis is time-consuming and can be expensive, as the facilities are generally not accessible for many research laboratories. METHODS: In the present study, a microfluidic electrophoresis system, the Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer, was used to analyze the STR-PCR fragments from 10 human genomic loci of a number of human cell lines, including 6 gliomas, 1 astrocyte, 1 primary lung cancer, 1 lung brain metastatic cancer, and 1 rhabdomyosarcoma; and this was compared with the standard method, that is, capillary electrophoresis, using the Applied Biosystems 3130xl Genetic Analyzer. RESULTS: The microfluidic electrophoresis method produced highly reproducible results with good sensitivity in sizing of multiple PCR fragments, and each cell line demonstrated a unique DNA profile. Furthermore, DNA fingerprinting of samples from 5 different passage numbers of the same cell line showed excellent reproducibility when FLA was performed with the Bioanalyzer, indicating that no cross-contamination had occurred during the culture period. CONCLUSION: This novel application provides a straightforward and cost-effective alternative to STR-based cell line authentication. In addition, this application would be of great value for cell bank repositories to maintain and distribute precious cell lines.
BACKGROUND: The current method for cell line authentication is genotyping based on short tandem repeat (STR)-PCR involving coamplification of a panel of STR loci by multiplex PCR and downstream fragment length analysis (FLA), usually performed by capillary electrophoresis. FLA by capillary electrophoresis is time-consuming and can be expensive, as the facilities are generally not accessible for many research laboratories. METHODS: In the present study, a microfluidic electrophoresis system, the Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer, was used to analyze the STR-PCR fragments from 10 human genomic loci of a number of human cell lines, including 6 gliomas, 1 astrocyte, 1 primary lung cancer, 1 lung brain metastatic cancer, and 1 rhabdomyosarcoma; and this was compared with the standard method, that is, capillary electrophoresis, using the Applied Biosystems 3130xl Genetic Analyzer. RESULTS: The microfluidic electrophoresis method produced highly reproducible results with good sensitivity in sizing of multiple PCR fragments, and each cell line demonstrated a unique DNA profile. Furthermore, DNA fingerprinting of samples from 5 different passage numbers of the same cell line showed excellent reproducibility when FLA was performed with the Bioanalyzer, indicating that no cross-contamination had occurred during the culture period. CONCLUSION: This novel application provides a straightforward and cost-effective alternative to STR-based cell line authentication. In addition, this application would be of great value for cell bank repositories to maintain and distribute precious cell lines.
Entities:
Keywords:
DNA fingerprinting; STR profiling; brain tumor cell authentication; microfluidics
Authors: Ogechi N Ikediobi; Helen Davies; Graham Bignell; Sarah Edkins; Claire Stevens; Sarah O'Meara; Thomas Santarius; Tim Avis; Syd Barthorpe; Lisa Brackenbury; Gemma Buck; Adam Butler; Jody Clements; Jennifer Cole; Ed Dicks; Simon Forbes; Kristian Gray; Kelly Halliday; Rachel Harrison; Katy Hills; Jonathan Hinton; Chris Hunter; Andy Jenkinson; David Jones; Vivienne Kosmidou; Richard Lugg; Andrew Menzies; Tatiana Mironenko; Adrian Parker; Janet Perry; Keiran Raine; David Richardson; Rebecca Shepherd; Alex Small; Raffaella Smith; Helen Solomon; Philip Stephens; Jon Teague; Calli Tofts; Jennifer Varian; Tony Webb; Sofie West; Sara Widaa; Andy Yates; William Reinhold; John N Weinstein; Michael R Stratton; P Andrew Futreal; Richard Wooster Journal: Mol Cancer Ther Date: 2006-11-06 Impact factor: 6.261
Authors: Anna V Roschke; Giovanni Tonon; Kristen S Gehlhaus; Nicolas McTyre; Kimberly J Bussey; Samir Lababidi; Dominic A Scudiero; John N Weinstein; Ilan R Kirsch Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2003-12-15 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Numrin Thaitrong; Hanyoup Kim; Ronald F Renzi; Michael S Bartsch; Robert J Meagher; Kamlesh D Patel Journal: Electrophoresis Date: 2012-11-08 Impact factor: 3.535
Authors: Samah A Jassam; Zaynah Maherally; James R Smith; Keyoumars Ashkan; Federico Roncaroli; Helen L Fillmore; Geoffrey J Pilkington Journal: Int J Mol Sci Date: 2017-07-10 Impact factor: 5.923
Authors: Alison Howarth; Claire Simms; Nitesh Kerai; Olivia Allen; Karina Mihajluk; Patricia A Madureira; Giannis Sokratous; Simon Cragg; Sang Y Lee; Andy D Morley; Keyoumars Ashkan; Paul A Cox; Geoffrey J Pilkington; Richard Hill Journal: Transl Oncol Date: 2019-07-30 Impact factor: 4.243