Literature DB >> 24335637

Radiographical predictors for postoperative sagittal imbalance in patients with thoracolumbar kyphosis secondary to ankylosing spondylitis after lumbar pedicle subtraction osteotomy.

Bang-ping Qian1, Jun Jiang, Yong Qiu, Bin Wang, Yang Yu, Ze-zhang Zhu.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: A retrospective radiographical study.
OBJECTIVE: To identify the radiographical predictors for sagittal imbalance in patients with thoracolumbar kyphosis secondary to ankylosing spondylitis (AS) after 1-level lumbar pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Few studies had correlated the preoperative sagittal parameters with postoperative sagittal alignments to determine the radiographical predictors for postoperative sagittal imbalance in patients with AS after 1-level lumbar PSO.
METHODS: Thirty-six patients with thoracolumbar kyphosis secondary to AS who underwent 1-level lumbar PSO were recruited with a minimal follow-up of 24 months (mean = 27.4 mo; range, 24-53 mo). Correlation analysis and subsequent stepwise multiple regression analysis were used to evaluate the correlations between preoperative parameters, including global kyphosis, local kyphosis, thoracic kyphosis, thoracolumbar Cobb angle, lumbar lordosis, pelvic incidence (PI), pelvic tilt, sacral slope, and sagittal vertical axis (SVA), as well as SVA at the last follow-up. All these patients were further divided into 2 groups according to the PI value (group A: PI >50°; group B: PI ≤50°). The correction outcomes were compared between these 2 groups.
RESULTS: The preoperative SVA was not significantly different between group A and group B (157.6 mm vs. 124.5 mm; P> 0.05), and both groups had similar magnitudes of kyphosis corrections at the last follow-up (global kyphosis: 42.9° vs. 46.1°; local kyphosis: 42.7° vs. 40.5°; lumbar lordosis: 35.7° vs. 43.0°). However, group A patients had significantly larger SVA at the last follow-up (73.2 mm vs. 28.7 mm; P< 0.05) and a higher incidence of postoperative sagittal imbalance (77.8% vs. 25.9%; P< 0.05) than those in group B. The stepwise multiple regression analysis demonstrated that both preoperative SVA and PI were significant independent predictors of postoperative sagittal alignments, which explained 52.0% and 9.7% of the variability of SVA at the last follow-up, respectively.
CONCLUSION: Patients with AS with either larger preoperative SVA or larger PI are more likely to experience failed sagittal realignments after 1-level lumbar PSO. For these patients, additional osteotomies may be recommended for satisfactory correction outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24335637     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  17 in total

1.  Can acetabular orientation be restored by lumbar pedicle subtraction osteotomy in ankylosing spondylitis patients with thoracolumbar kyphosis?

Authors:  Jun Hu; Bang-Ping Qian; Yong Qiu; Bin Wang; Yang Yu; Ze-Zhang Zhu; Jun Jiang; Sai-Hu Mao; Zhe Qu; Yun-Peng Zhang
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-07-19       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Sacrum pubic incidence and sacrum pubic posterior angle: two morphologic radiological parameters in assessing pelvic sagittal alignment in human adults.

Authors:  Weijun Wang; Mingda Wu; Zhen Liu; Leilei Xu; Feng Zhu; Zezhang Zhu; Wenjie Weng; Yong Qiu
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-04-22       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Compensatory modulation for severe global sagittal imbalance: significance of cervical compensation on quality of life in thoracolumbar kyphosis secondary to ankylosing spondylitis.

Authors:  Jin Qian; Yong Qiu; Bang-Ping Qian; Ze-Zhang Zhu; Bin Wang; Yang Yu
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-03-08       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 4.  Osteotomies in ankylosing spondylitis: where, how many, and how much?

Authors:  Heiko Koller; Juliane Koller; Michael Mayer; Axel Hempfing; Wolfgang Hitzl
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-12-30       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Two level pedicle substraction osteotomies for the treatment of severe fixed sagittal plane deformity: computer software-assisted preoperative planning and assessing.

Authors:  Yunus Atici; Yunus Emre Akman; Mehmet Bulent Balioglu; Deniz Kargin; Mehmet Akif Kaygusuz
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-03-25       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Characteristics of deformity surgery in patients with severe and rigid cervical kyphosis (CK): results of the CSRS-Europe multi-centre study project.

Authors:  H Koller; C Ames; H Mehdian; R Bartels; R Ferch; V Deriven; H Toyone; C Shaffrey; J Smith; W Hitzl; J Schröder; Yohan Robinson
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-11-27       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Grayscale inversion radiographic view provided improved intra- and inter-observer reliabilities in measuring spinopelvic parameters in asymptomatic adult population.

Authors:  Weixiang Sun; Jin Zhou; Xiaodong Qin; Leilei Xu; Xinxin Yuan; Yang Li; Yong Qiu; Zezhang Zhu
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2016-10-03       Impact factor: 2.362

8.  Treatment of kyphosis in ankylosing spondylitis by osteotomy through the gap of a pathological fracture: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Hongqi Zhang; Zhenhai Zhou; Chaofeng Guo; Yuxiang Wang; Honggui Yu; Longjie Wang
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2016-11-08       Impact factor: 2.359

9.  The patterns of loss of correction after posterior wedge osteotomy in ankylosing spondylitis-related thoracolumbar kyphosis: a minimum of five-year follow-up.

Authors:  Mu Qiao; Bang-Ping Qian; Sai-Hu Mao; Yong Qiu; Bin Wang
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2017-11-17       Impact factor: 2.362

10.  Vertebral body or intervertebral disc wedging: which contributes more to thoracolumbar kyphosis in ankylosing spondylitis patients?: A retrospective study.

Authors:  Hao Liu; Bang-Ping Qian; Yong Qiu; Yan Wang; Bin Wang; Yang Yu; Ze-Zhang Zhu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 1.889

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.