OBJECTIVE: Inbred mouse strains have different susceptibilities to experimental atherosclerosis. The C57BL/6 strain is among the most sensitive and has, therefore, been the most widely used in atherosclerosis studies, whereas many strains are resistant. The FVB/N strain is highly resistant to atherosclerosis on the apolipoprotein E (apoE)- and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) receptor-deficient backgrounds. High-density lipoprotein and its major apoprotein, apoA-I, have been shown to be protective against atherogenesis on the C57BL/6 background. We here examine the influence of genetic background on the atheroprotective nature of apoA-I. APPROACH AND RESULTS: ApoE-deficient/apoA-I-deficient mice were generated in the C57BL/6 and FVB/N strains from apoE-deficient mice. After 6 to 10 weeks on a Western-type diet, plasma lipids and atherosclerotic lesion size were assessed. Macrophage recruitment, cholesterol regulation, and blood monocyte levels were examined as potential mechanisms driving lesion size differences. FVB/N knockout mice had higher plasma very-LDL/LDL cholesterol than their C57BL/6 counterparts. ApoA-I deficiency decreased very-LDL/LDL cholesterol in C57BL/6 mice but not in FVB/N mice. FVB/N single and double knockout mice had less lesion than C57BL/6 6 to 10 weeks on diet. ApoA-I deficiency augmented lesion development only in C57BL/6 mice. Macrophage recruitment to thioglycollate-treated peritoneum and diet-induced blood monocyte levels reflected the pattern of lesion development among the 4 genotypes. ApoA-I deficiency increased macrophage cholesterol content only in C57BL/6. FVB/N plasma was a better acceptor for macrophage cholesterol efflux than C57BL/6. CONCLUSIONS: ApoA-I is atheroprotective only in certain genetic contexts. In the C57BL/6 context, but not FVB/N, apoA-I decreases inflammatory macrophage recruitment and monocytosis, contributors to lesion formation.
OBJECTIVE: Inbred mouse strains have different susceptibilities to experimental atherosclerosis. The C57BL/6 strain is among the most sensitive and has, therefore, been the most widely used in atherosclerosis studies, whereas many strains are resistant. The FVB/N strain is highly resistant to atherosclerosis on the apolipoprotein E (apoE)- and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) receptor-deficient backgrounds. High-density lipoprotein and its major apoprotein, apoA-I, have been shown to be protective against atherogenesis on the C57BL/6 background. We here examine the influence of genetic background on the atheroprotective nature of apoA-I. APPROACH AND RESULTS:ApoE-deficient/apoA-I-deficient mice were generated in the C57BL/6 and FVB/N strains from apoE-deficient mice. After 6 to 10 weeks on a Western-type diet, plasma lipids and atherosclerotic lesion size were assessed. Macrophage recruitment, cholesterol regulation, and blood monocyte levels were examined as potential mechanisms driving lesion size differences. FVB/N knockout mice had higher plasma very-LDL/LDL cholesterol than their C57BL/6 counterparts. ApoA-Ideficiency decreased very-LDL/LDL cholesterol in C57BL/6 mice but not in FVB/N mice. FVB/N single and double knockout mice had less lesion than C57BL/6 6 to 10 weeks on diet. ApoA-Ideficiency augmented lesion development only in C57BL/6 mice. Macrophage recruitment to thioglycollate-treated peritoneum and diet-induced blood monocyte levels reflected the pattern of lesion development among the 4 genotypes. ApoA-I deficiency increased macrophage cholesterol content only in C57BL/6. FVB/N plasma was a better acceptor for macrophage cholesterol efflux than C57BL/6. CONCLUSIONS:ApoA-I is atheroprotective only in certain genetic contexts. In the C57BL/6 context, but not FVB/N, apoA-I decreases inflammatory macrophage recruitment and monocytosis, contributors to lesion formation.
Authors: Stela Z Berisha; Greg Brubaker; Takhar Kasumov; Kimberly T Hung; Patricia M DiBello; Ying Huang; Ling Li; Belinda Willard; Katherine A Pollard; Laura E Nagy; Stanley L Hazen; Jonathan D Smith Journal: J Lipid Res Date: 2015-01-05 Impact factor: 5.922
Authors: Paulette A Krishack; Clarissa V Bhanvadia; John Lukens; Timothy J Sontag; Maria C De Beer; Godfrey S Getz; Catherine A Reardon Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2015-07-17 Impact factor: 5.501
Authors: Nathalie Pamir; Patrick Hutchins; Graziella Ronsein; Tomas Vaisar; Catherine A Reardon; Godfrey S Getz; Aldons J Lusis; Jay W Heinecke Journal: J Lipid Res Date: 2015-12-15 Impact factor: 5.922