Literature DB >> 24333543

Cardiac implantable electronic device infections: incidence, risk factors, and the effect of the AigisRx antibacterial envelope.

Suneet Mittal1, Richard E Shaw2, Kimberly Michel2, Rachel Palekar2, Aysha Arshad2, Dan Musat2, Mark Preminger2, Tina Sichrovsky2, Jonathan S Steinberg2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) infection is associated with morbidity and mortality.
OBJECTIVES: To determine the incidence and risk factors for CIED infection, to develop a scoring index for risk stratification, and to analyze the effect of the AIGISRx envelope on infection rates.
METHODS: Consecutive patients who underwent a CIED procedure were identified and surveyed for 6 months for the development of an infection necessitating removal of all implanted hardware.
RESULTS: In the pre-envelope era, an infection occurred in 25 (1.5%) of 1651 patients. After its availability, an envelope was used in 275 (22%) of 1240 patients; an infection occurred in 8 (0.6%) patients in this era (P = .029 vs pre-envelope). In the overall cohort of 2891 patients, the infection rate was 1.2% and 3.5% in patients with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator device and those with a cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator device, respectively (P = .018); in these patients, 7 independent risk factors predicted infection: early pocket re-exploration, male sex, diabetes, upgrade procedure, heart failure, hypertension, and glomerular filtration rate < 60 mL/min. A composite risk score (0-25; C index 0.72; 95% confidence interval 0.61-0.83) was created by weight, adjusting these 7 factors: 3 groups emerged-low risk (score 0-7; 1% infection), medium risk (score 8-14; 3.4% infection), and high risk (score ≥15; 11.1% infection). The envelope reduced infections by 79% and 100% in the medium- and high-risk groups, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: CIED infection most commonly occurred in patients with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator device and those with a cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator device. A composite score based on clinical variables appeared feasible for infection risk stratification. The AIGISRx envelope significantly lowered the risk of CIED infection. Randomized clinical data are warranted.
Copyright © 2014 Heart Rhythm Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cardiac implantable electronic device; Infection

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24333543     DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2013.12.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heart Rhythm        ISSN: 1547-5271            Impact factor:   6.343


  42 in total

1.  A meta-analysis of antibacterial envelope use in prevention of cardiovascular implantable electronic device infection.

Authors:  Sajid Ali; Yousuf Kanjwal; Steven R Bruhl; Mohammed Alo; Mohammed Taleb; Syed S Ali; Ameer Kabour; Owais Khawaja
Journal:  Ther Adv Infect Dis       Date:  2017-05-01

Review 2.  Complications from prophylactic replacement of cardiac implantable electronic device generators in response to United States Food and Drug Administration recall: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Emily P Zeitler; Divyang Patel; Vic Hasselblad; Gillian D Sanders; Sana M Al-Khatib
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2015-04-03       Impact factor: 6.343

3.  Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Infection in Patients at Risk.

Authors:  Khaldoun G Tarakji; Christopher R Ellis; Pascal Defaye; Charles Kennergren
Journal:  Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev       Date:  2016-05

4.  Polymeric nanofiber coating with tunable combinatorial antibiotic delivery prevents biofilm-associated infection in vivo.

Authors:  Alyssa G Ashbaugh; Xuesong Jiang; Jesse Zheng; Andrew S Tsai; Woo-Shin Kim; John M Thompson; Robert J Miller; Jonathan H Shahbazian; Yu Wang; Carly A Dillen; Alvaro A Ordonez; Yong S Chang; Sanjay K Jain; Lynne C Jones; Robert S Sterling; Hai-Quan Mao; Lloyd S Miller
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-10-24       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  A Roadmap for Reducing Cardiac Device Infections: a Review of Epidemiology, Pathogenesis, and Actionable Risk Factors to Guide the Development of an Infection Prevention Program for the Electrophysiology Laboratory.

Authors:  Westyn Branch-Elliman
Journal:  Curr Infect Dis Rep       Date:  2017-08-16       Impact factor: 3.725

6.  Is ventricular sensing always right, when it is left?

Authors:  Mauro Biffi; Giulia de Zan; Giulia Massaro; Andrea Angeletti; Cristian Martignani; Giuseppe Boriani; Igor Diemberger; Matteo Ziacchi
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2018-09-21       Impact factor: 2.882

Review 7.  Implantable cardioverter defibrillators in diabetics: efficacy and safety in patients at risk of sudden cardiac death.

Authors:  Muhammad Shahreyar; Vijayadershan Mupiddi; Indrajit Choudhuri; Jasbir Sra; Abdul Jamil Tajik; Arshad Jahangir
Journal:  Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther       Date:  2015-06-22

8.  New Insights into Predictors of Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Infection.

Authors:  Hossein Sadeghi; Abolfath Alizadehdiz; Amirfarjam Fazelifar; Zahra Emkanjoo; Majid Haghjoo
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2018-06-01

9.  Efficacy of a Bio-Absorbable Antibacterial Envelope to Prevent Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Infections in High-Risk Subjects.

Authors:  Matthew J Kolek; Neel J Patel; Walter K Clair; S Patrick Whalen; Jeffrey N Rottman; Arvindh Kanagasundram; Sharon T Shen; Pablo J Saavedra; Juan C Estrada; Robert L Abraham; Christopher R Ellis
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol       Date:  2015-09-06

Review 10.  Prevention, Diagnosis, and Treatment of Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Infections.

Authors:  Steven Leung; Stephan Danik
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 2.931

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.