Literature DB >> 24332791

Mercury cycling in agricultural and managed wetlands, Yolo Bypass, California: spatial and seasonal variations in water quality.

Charles N Alpers1, Jacob A Fleck2, Mark Marvin-DiPasquale3, Craig A Stricker4, Mark Stephenson5, Howard E Taylor6.   

Abstract

The seasonal and spatial variability of water quality, including mercury species, was evaluated in agricultural and managed, non-agricultural wetlands in the Yolo Bypass Wildlife Area, an area managed for multiple beneficial uses including bird habitat and rice farming. The study was conducted during an 11-month period (June 2007 to April 2008) that included a summer growing season and flooded conditions during winter. Methylmercury (MeHg) concentrations in surface water varied over a wide range (0.1 to 37ngL(-1) unfiltered; 0.04 to 7.3ngL(-1) filtered). Maximum MeHg values are among the highest ever recorded in wetlands. Highest MeHg concentrations in unfiltered surface water were observed in drainage from wild rice fields during harvest (September 2007), and in white rice fields with decomposing rice straw during regional flooding (February 2008). The ratio of MeHg to total mercury (MeHg/THg) increased about 20-fold in both unfiltered and filtered water during the growing season (June to August 2007) in the white and wild rice fields, and about 5-fold in fallow fields (July to August 2007), while there was little to no change in MeHg/THg in the permanent wetland. Sulfate-bearing fertilizer had no effect on Hg(II) methylation, as sulfate-reducing bacteria were not sulfate-limited in these agricultural wetlands. Concentrations of MeHg in filtered and unfiltered water correlated with filtered Fe, filtered Mn, DOC, and two indicators of sulfate reduction: the SO4(2-)/Cl(-) ratio, and δ(34)S in aqueous sulfate. These relationships suggest that microbial reduction of SO4(2-), Fe(III), and possibly Mn(IV) may contribute to net Hg(II)-methylation in this setting.
© 2013.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Iron-reduction; Manganese; Methylmercury; Rice agriculture; Sulfate-reduction; Wild rice

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24332791     DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.10.096

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  7 in total

1.  Effects of early life exposure to methylmercury in Daphnia pulex on standard and reduced food ration.

Authors:  Dzigbodi A Doke; Sherri L Hudson; John A Dawson; Julia M Gohlke
Journal:  Reprod Toxicol       Date:  2014-09-28       Impact factor: 3.143

Review 2.  Rice methylmercury exposure and mitigation: a comprehensive review.

Authors:  Sarah E Rothenberg; Lisamarie Windham-Myers; Joel E Creswell
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2014-06-25       Impact factor: 6.498

3.  Water management impacts rice methylmercury and the soil microbiome.

Authors:  Sarah E Rothenberg; Merle Anders; Nadim J Ajami; Joseph F Petrosino; Erika Balogh
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2016-07-20       Impact factor: 7.963

4.  Distribution and fractionation of mercury in the soils of a unique tropical agricultural wetland ecosystem, southwest coast of India.

Authors:  C Navya; V G Gopikrishna; V Arunbabu; Mahesh Mohan
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2015-11-13       Impact factor: 2.513

5.  Challenges and opportunities for managing aquatic mercury pollution in altered landscapes.

Authors:  Heileen Hsu-Kim; Chris S Eckley; Dario Achá; Xinbin Feng; Cynthia C Gilmour; Sofi Jonsson; Carl P J Mitchell
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 5.129

6.  Rice life cycle-based global mercury biotransport and human methylmercury exposure.

Authors:  Maodian Liu; Qianru Zhang; Menghan Cheng; Yipeng He; Long Chen; Haoran Zhang; Hanlin Cao; Huizhong Shen; Wei Zhang; Shu Tao; Xuejun Wang
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2019-11-14       Impact factor: 14.919

7.  Mercury concentrations and distribution in soil, water, mine waste leachates, and air in and around mercury mines in the Big Bend region, Texas, USA.

Authors:  John E Gray; Peter M Theodorakos; David L Fey; David P Krabbenhoft
Journal:  Environ Geochem Health       Date:  2014-06-29       Impact factor: 4.609

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.