Tom M Lawrence1, Shahryar Ahmadi1, Bernard F Morrey1, Joaquín Sánchez-Sotelo2. 1. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA. 2. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA. Electronic address: sanchezsotelo.joaquin@mayo.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: This study set out to accurately determine the incidence of wound complications after distal humerus fracture fixation, to assess risk factors, and to determine their implications on outcome. METHODS: Eighty-nine distal humerus fractures (mean patient age, 58 years) were treated with internal fixation at an average of 4 days after injury. Mean follow-up time was 15 months (range, 6-72 months). Twenty-nine (33%) fractures were open. Medical records and radiographs were reviewed to determine wound complications. Logistic regression analysis was carried out to determine associated risk factors. RESULTS: Fourteen patients (15.7%) developed a major wound complication requiring on average 2.5 (range, 1-6) additional surgical procedures. Six patients required plastic surgical soft tissue coverage. All 14 fractures complicated by wound problems united. The final mean range of motion in the major wound complication group was 100° (range, 65°-130°), compared with 100° (range, 10°-140°) in those with no or minor wound problems. Grade III open fractures and the use of a plate to stabilize the olecranon osteotomy were identified as significant risk factors for development of major wound complications. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of major wound complications after fixation of distal humerus fractures is substantial. The presence of a grade III open fracture and the use of an olecranon osteotomy stabilized with a plate are significant risk factors for major wound complications. Fracture healing rates and functional elbow range of motion do not appear to be affected by major wound complications when they are handled with proper soft tissue coverage techniques.
BACKGROUND: This study set out to accurately determine the incidence of wound complications after distal humerus fracture fixation, to assess risk factors, and to determine their implications on outcome. METHODS: Eighty-nine distal humerus fractures (mean patient age, 58 years) were treated with internal fixation at an average of 4 days after injury. Mean follow-up time was 15 months (range, 6-72 months). Twenty-nine (33%) fractures were open. Medical records and radiographs were reviewed to determine wound complications. Logistic regression analysis was carried out to determine associated risk factors. RESULTS: Fourteen patients (15.7%) developed a major wound complication requiring on average 2.5 (range, 1-6) additional surgical procedures. Six patients required plastic surgical soft tissue coverage. All 14 fractures complicated by wound problems united. The final mean range of motion in the major wound complication group was 100° (range, 65°-130°), compared with 100° (range, 10°-140°) in those with no or minor wound problems. Grade III open fractures and the use of a plate to stabilize the olecranon osteotomy were identified as significant risk factors for development of major wound complications. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of major wound complications after fixation of distal humerus fractures is substantial. The presence of a grade III open fracture and the use of an olecranon osteotomy stabilized with a plate are significant risk factors for major wound complications. Fracture healing rates and functional elbow range of motion do not appear to be affected by major wound complications when they are handled with proper soft tissue coverage techniques.
Authors: Kirsten Kortram; Hans Bezstarosti; Willem-Jan Metsemakers; Michael J Raschke; Esther M M Van Lieshout; Michael H J Verhofstad Journal: Int Orthop Date: 2017-07-25 Impact factor: 3.075
Authors: Onur Tunalı; Ali Erşen; Tuna Pehlivanoğlu; Serkan Bayram; Ata C Atalar; Mehmet Demirhan Journal: Int Orthop Date: 2018-02-01 Impact factor: 3.075
Authors: Femke M A P Claessen; Yvonne Braun; Wouter F van Leeuwen; George S Dyer; Michel P J van den Bekerom; David Ring Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2015-08-25 Impact factor: 4.176
Authors: G A M Govaert; A W J M Glaudemans; J J W Ploegmakers; A R Viddeleer; K W Wendt; I H F Reininga Journal: Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg Date: 2017-03-22 Impact factor: 3.693