| Literature DB >> 24332464 |
Ulrich Thormann1, Thaqif El Khawassna2, Seemun Ray2, Lutz Duerselen3, Marian Kampschulte4, Katrin Lips2, Helena von Dewitz4, Sascha Heinemann5, Christian Heiss1, Gabor Szalay6, Alexander C Langheinrich7, Anita Ignatius3, Reinhard Schnettler1, Volker Alt8.
Abstract
Discrepancies in bone healing between osteoporotic and non-osteoporotic bone remain uncertain. The focus of the current work is to evaluate potential healing discrepancies in a metaphyseal defect model in rat femora. Female Sprague-Dawley rats were either ovariectomized (OVX, n=14) and combined with a calcium-, phosphorus- and vitamin D3-, soy- and phytoestrogen-free diet or received SHAM operation with standard diet rat (SHAM, n=14). Three months post-ovariectomy, DEXA measurement showed a reduction of bone mineral density reflecting an osteoporotic bone status in OVX rats. Rats then underwent a 3 mm wedge-shaped osteotomy at the distal metaphyseal area of the left femur stabilized with a T-shaped mini-plate and allowed to heal for 6 weeks. Biomechanical competence by means of a non-destructive three-point bending test showed significant lower flexural rigidity in the OVX rats at 3 mm lever span compared to SHAM animals (p=0.048) but no differences at 10 mm lever span. Microcomputer tomography (μCT) showed bridging cortices and consolidation of the defect in both groups, however, no measurable differences were found in either total ossified tissue or vascular volume fraction. Furthermore, histology showed healing discrepancies that were characterized by cartilaginous remnant and more unmineralized tissue presence in the OVX rats compared to more mature consolidation appearance in the SHAM group. In summary, bone defect healing in metaphyseal bone slightly differs between osteoporotic and non-osteoporotic bone in the current 3 mm defect model in both 3mm lever span biomechanical testing and histology.Entities:
Keywords: Bone healing; Fracture; Metaphysis; Osteoporosis; Osteotomy
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 24332464 DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2013.10.033
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Injury ISSN: 0020-1383 Impact factor: 2.586