Literature DB >> 24332446

Lack of visual evoked potentials amplitude decrement during prolonged reversal and motion stimulation in migraineurs.

Michal Bednář1, Zuzana Kubová2, Jan Kremláček3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We evaluated response decrement during a short time repetitive low and high contrast reversal and low contrast motion stimulation in controls and migraineurs.
METHODS: A total of 39 migraine patients (out of which 19 were in the interictal period and without prophylactic treatment) and 36 healthy volunteers were examined using pattern-reversal (PR-VEP) and motion-onset (M-VEP) visual evoked potentials. Binocular stimulation lasted 2.5 min and the decrement assessment was blinded.
RESULTS: Evidence of significant decrement was observed in healthy volunteers for high contrast PR-VEP amplitude of P100-N75 ratios between the fifth and first blocks (0.9; p=0.001) with a linear decline (-0.7 μV/min, p=0.001) and in the P100-N145 amplitude with linear decline (-0.5 μV/min, p=0.004). Significant decrement was also observed for the ratio between the fifth and first block P1-N2 amplitudes in M-VEP (0.9, p=0.006). No significant decrement was noted in the low contrast PR-VEP or among migraineurs.
CONCLUSIONS: We confirm differences in decrease of VEPs amplitude during short term examination between controls and migraineurs. We showed the decrement deficit also in the extrastriatal regions of the migraineurs' visual cortex. SIGNIFICANCE: Low contrast and motion-onset stimuli in short time decrement assessment did not increase the test sensitivity.
Copyright © 2013 International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Habituation; Migraine; Visual evoked potentials; Visual motion; Visual processing

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24332446     DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2013.10.050

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 1388-2457            Impact factor:   3.708


  6 in total

1.  A novel system for measuring visual potentials evoked by passive head-mounted display stimulators.

Authors:  Rossana Terracciano; Alessandro Sanginario; Luana Puleo; Danilo Demarchi
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-10-18       Impact factor: 2.379

Review 2.  Altered processing of sensory stimuli in patients with migraine.

Authors:  Marina de Tommaso; Anna Ambrosini; Filippo Brighina; Gianluca Coppola; Armando Perrotta; Francesco Pierelli; Giorgio Sandrini; Massimiliano Valeriani; Daniele Marinazzo; Sebastiano Stramaglia; Jean Schoenen
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2014-02-18       Impact factor: 42.937

3.  Controversies about the role of the deficit of habituation of evoked potentials in migraine: a disease biomarker? PROS.

Authors:  Anna Ambrosini
Journal:  J Headache Pain       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 7.277

Review 4.  Clinical neurophysiology of migraine with aura.

Authors:  Gianluca Coppola; Cherubino Di Lorenzo; Vincenzo Parisi; Marco Lisicki; Mariano Serrao; Francesco Pierelli
Journal:  J Headache Pain       Date:  2019-04-29       Impact factor: 7.277

5.  Current understanding of cortical structure and function in migraine.

Authors:  Else A Tolner; Shih-Pin Chen; Katharina Eikermann-Haerter
Journal:  Cephalalgia       Date:  2019-03-28       Impact factor: 6.292

6.  Visual evoked potentials in subgroups of migraine with aura patients.

Authors:  Gianluca Coppola; Martina Bracaglia; Davide Di Lenola; Cherubino Di Lorenzo; Mariano Serrao; Vincenzo Parisi; Antonio Di Renzo; Francesco Martelli; Antonello Fadda; Jean Schoenen; Francesco Pierelli
Journal:  J Headache Pain       Date:  2015-11-02       Impact factor: 7.277

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.