Literature DB >> 24332434

Abortion barriers and perceptions of gestational age among women seeking abortion care in the latter half of the second trimester.

Elizabeth Janiak1, Ichiro Kawachi2, Alisa Goldberg3, Barbara Gottlieb4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Later second-trimester abortion (gestational age ≥ 19 weeks) is higher risk, more expensive and more difficult to access than abortion earlier in pregnancy. We sought to enumerate barriers to care described by women seeking abortion in the latter half of the second trimester. We also assessed the accuracy of later second-trimester abortion patients' perceptions of their pregnancies' gestational ages. STUDY
DESIGN: A retrospective analysis of data from 232 women served by a referral program for women seeking abortion care between 19 and 24 weeks of gestational age was performed. Data collected included demographics, pregnancy history, gestational age by ultrasound, perceived gestational age, barriers to abortion care experienced and time lapsed from pregnancy recognition to presentation for care.
RESULTS: Difficulty deciding whether to terminate (44.8%), financial barriers to care (22.0%) and the patient having recently realized she was pregnant (21.6%) were the most common delaying barriers cited. Nearly half (46.6%) of women underestimated their own gestational ages by greater than 4 weeks. Risk factors for experiencing at least 3 months time lapsed from pregnancy recognition to program referral included difficulty deciding whether to terminate [odds ratio (OR) 4.08, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.51-8.70] and nonwhite race/ethnicity (OR 2.04, 95% CI 1.16-3.57).
CONCLUSIONS: Women seeking abortion care in the latter half of the second trimester encounter many of the same barriers previously identified among other abortion patient populations. Because many risk factors for delayed presentation for care are not amenable to intervention, abortion must remain available later in the second trimester. IMPLICATIONS: Women presenting for abortion in the later second trimester are delayed by structural and individual-level barriers, and many substantially underestimate their own gestational age. Removing financial barriers may help reduce abortion delay; however, many risk factors are nonmodifiable, underscoring the need to ensure access to later second-trimester abortion.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Abortion barriers; Second-trimester abortion

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24332434     DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2013.11.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contraception        ISSN: 0010-7824            Impact factor:   3.375


  13 in total

1.  Implications of Georgia's 20-Week Abortion Ban.

Authors:  Sarah C M Roberts; Heather Gould; Ushma D Upadhyay
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2015-06-11       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Induced abortion in a Southern European region: examining inequalities between native and immigrant women.

Authors:  Elena Rodriguez-Alvarez; Luisa N Borrell; Yolanda González-Rábago; Unai Martín; Nerea Lanborena
Journal:  Int J Public Health       Date:  2016-02-22       Impact factor: 3.380

3.  Abortion Trends in Georgia Following Enactment of the 22-Week Gestational Age Limit, 2007-2017.

Authors:  Kelli Stidham Hall; Sara Redd; Subasri Narasimhan; Elizabeth A Mosley; Sophie A Hartwig; Emily Lemon; Erin Berry; Eva Lathrop; Lisa B Haddad; Roger Rochat; Carrie Cwiak
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2020-05-21       Impact factor: 11.561

4.  Gestating times: women's accounts of the temporalities of pregnancies that end in abortion in England.

Authors:  Siân M Beynon-Jones
Journal:  Sociol Health Illn       Date:  2016-12-02

5.  Women's embodied experiences of second trimester medical abortion.

Authors:  Carrie Purcell; Audrey Brown; Catriona Melville; Lisa M McDaid
Journal:  Fem Psychol       Date:  2017-01-01

6.  Accuracy of gestational age estimation from last menstrual period among women seeking abortion in South Africa, with a view to task sharing: a mixed methods study.

Authors:  Deborah Constant; Jane Harries; Jennifer Moodley; Landon Myer
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2017-08-22       Impact factor: 3.223

7.  Induced Second Trimester Abortion and Associated Factors at Debre Markos Referral Hospital: Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Bekele Tesfaye; Mesenbet Tewabe; Aster Ferede; Angela Dawson
Journal:  Womens Health (Lond)       Date:  2020 Jan-Dec

8.  Massachusetts' Parental Consent Law and Procedural Timing Among Adolescents Undergoing Abortion.

Authors:  Elizabeth Janiak; Isabel R Fulcher; Alischer A Cottrill; Nicole Tantoco; Ashley H Mason; Jennifer Fortin; Jamie Sabino; Alisa B Goldberg
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 7.661

9.  Induced second trimester abortion and associated factors in Amhara region referral hospitals.

Authors:  Amlaku Mulat; Hinsermu Bayu; Habtamu Mellie; Amare Alemu
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-03-30       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 10.  Sex selection and non-invasive prenatal testing: A review of current practices, evidence, and ethical issues.

Authors:  Hilary Bowman-Smart; Julian Savulescu; Christopher Gyngell; Cara Mand; Martin B Delatycki
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2019-10-10       Impact factor: 3.050

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.