Axel Van Der Gucht1, Benjamin Serrano2, Florent Hugonnet3, Benoît Paulmier3, Nicolas Garnier2, Marc Faraggi3. 1. Department of Nuclear Medicine, Centre Hospitalier Princesse Grace, Monaco, Monaco. Electronic address: axel.vandergucht@gmail.com. 2. Department of Medical Physics, Centre Hospitalier Princesse Grace, Monaco, Monaco. 3. Department of Nuclear Medicine, Centre Hospitalier Princesse Grace, Monaco, Monaco.
Abstract
UNLABELLED: PET acquisition requires several minutes which can lead to respiratory motion blurring, to increase partial volume effect and SUV under-estimation. To avoid these artifacts, conventional 10-min phase-based respiratory gating (PBRG) can be performed but is time-consuming and difficult with a non-compliant patient. We evaluated an automatic amplitude-based gating method (AABG) which keeps 35% of the counts at the end of expiration to minimize respiratory motion. We estimated the impact of AABG on upper abdominal lesion detectability, quantification and patient management. METHODS: We consecutively included 31 patients (82 hepatic and 25 perihepatic known lesions). Each patient underwent 3 acquisitions on a Siemens Biograph mCT (4 rings and time-of-flight): a standard free-breathing whole-body (SWB, 5-7 steps/2.5 min per step, 3.3±0.4 MBq/kg of 18F-FDG), a 10-min PBRG with six bins and a 5-min AABG method. All gated acquisitions were performed with an ANZAI respiratory gating system. SUVmax and target to background ratio (TBR, defined as the maximum SUV of the lesion divided by the mean SUV of a region of interest drawn in healthy liver) were compared. RESULTS: All 94 lesions in SWB images were detected in the gated images. 10-min PBRG and 5-min AABG acquisitions respectively revealed 9 and 13 new lesions and relocated 7 and 8 lesions. Four lesions revealed by 5-min AABG were missed by 10-min PBRG in 3 non-compliant patients. Both gated methods failed to relocate 2 lesions seen on SWB acquisition. Compared to SWB, TBR increased significantly with 10-min PBRG and with 5-min AABG (respectively 41±59%, p=4.10-3 and 66±75%, p=6.10-5) whereas SUVmax did not (respectively 14±43%, p=0.29 with 10-min PBRG, and 24±46%, p=0.11 with 5-min AABG). CONCLUSION: The AABG is a fast and a user-friendly respiratory gating method to increase detectability and quantification of upper abdominal lesions compared to the conventional PBRG procedure and the SWB acquisition.
UNLABELLED: PET acquisition requires several minutes which can lead to respiratory motion blurring, to increase partial volume effect and SUV under-estimation. To avoid these artifacts, conventional 10-min phase-based respiratory gating (PBRG) can be performed but is time-consuming and difficult with a non-compliant patient. We evaluated an automatic amplitude-based gating method (AABG) which keeps 35% of the counts at the end of expiration to minimize respiratory motion. We estimated the impact of AABG on upper abdominal lesion detectability, quantification and patient management. METHODS: We consecutively included 31 patients (82 hepatic and 25 perihepatic known lesions). Each patient underwent 3 acquisitions on a Siemens Biograph mCT (4 rings and time-of-flight): a standard free-breathing whole-body (SWB, 5-7 steps/2.5 min per step, 3.3±0.4 MBq/kg of 18F-FDG), a 10-min PBRG with six bins and a 5-min AABG method. All gated acquisitions were performed with an ANZAI respiratory gating system. SUVmax and target to background ratio (TBR, defined as the maximum SUV of the lesion divided by the mean SUV of a region of interest drawn in healthy liver) were compared. RESULTS: All 94 lesions in SWB images were detected in the gated images. 10-min PBRG and 5-min AABG acquisitions respectively revealed 9 and 13 new lesions and relocated 7 and 8 lesions. Four lesions revealed by 5-min AABG were missed by 10-min PBRG in 3 non-compliant patients. Both gated methods failed to relocate 2 lesions seen on SWB acquisition. Compared to SWB, TBR increased significantly with 10-min PBRG and with 5-min AABG (respectively 41±59%, p=4.10-3 and 66±75%, p=6.10-5) whereas SUVmax did not (respectively 14±43%, p=0.29 with 10-min PBRG, and 24±46%, p=0.11 with 5-min AABG). CONCLUSION: The AABG is a fast and a user-friendly respiratory gating method to increase detectability and quantification of upper abdominal lesions compared to the conventional PBRG procedure and the SWB acquisition.
Authors: Chung Chan; John Onofrey; Yiqiang Jian; Mary Germino; Xenophon Papademetris; Richard E Carson; Chi Liu Journal: IEEE Trans Med Imaging Date: 2017-10-10 Impact factor: 10.048
Authors: Lucy A Fowkes; Dow-Mu Koh; David J Collins; Neil P Jerome; David MacVicar; Sue C Chua; Andrew D J Pearson Journal: Pediatr Radiol Date: 2015-06-05
Authors: Dustin R Osborne; Shelley N Acuff; Melissa L Neveu; Mumtaz Syed; Austin D Kaman; Yitong Fu Journal: Nucl Med Commun Date: 2018-03 Impact factor: 1.690
Authors: Héctor Espinós-Morató; David Cascales-Picó; Marina Vergara; Ángel Hernández-Martínez; José María Benlloch Baviera; María José Rodríguez-Álvarez Journal: Sensors (Basel) Date: 2021-04-08 Impact factor: 3.576
Authors: Philippe Robin; David Bourhis; Brieuc Bernard; Ronan Abgral; Solène Querellou; Alexandra Le Duc-Pennec; Pierre-Yves Le Roux; Pierre-Yves Salaün Journal: Front Med (Lausanne) Date: 2018-02-19