Literature DB >> 24332348

Improving outcome of surgical procedures is not possible without adequate quality measurement.

Thorsten Schlomm1, Hartwig Huland2, Markus Graefen2.   

Abstract

Outcome measurement allows for acknowledging differences in quality and must be used as a basis for quality assessment, regardless of what procedure is to be assessed and improved. As urologists, we should actively take the lead to guide this necessary and inevitable process.
Copyright © 2013 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Mesh：

Year:  2013        PMID： 24332348     DOI： 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.11.042

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol        ISSN： 0302-2838            Impact factor:   20.096


  5 in total

1.  "They Have to Adapt to Learn": Surgeons' Perspectives on the Role of Procedural Variation in Surgical Education.

Authors:  Tavis Apramian; Sayra Cristancho; Chris Watling; Michael Ott; Lorelei Lingard
Journal:  J Surg Educ       Date:  2015-12-15       Impact factor: 2.891

2.  [Systematic analysis of treatment results as a quality control instrument using the example of a large European center].

Authors:  B Beyer; H Huland; M Graefen
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 0.639

3.  A cross-sectional pilot study to investigate patient attitudes and perception regarding the use of real time digital recording of urological procedures for research and teaching purposes.

Authors:  Gary Sharp; Giorgio Mazzon; Ranjan Thilagarajah
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2015-04-14

4.  Digital recording and documentation of endoscopic procedures: physicians' practice and perspectives.

Authors:  Maya Peled-Raz; Nadav Willner; Dan Shteinberg; Keren Or-Chen; Tova Rainis
Journal:  Isr J Health Policy Res       Date:  2019-07-02

5.  Single institution followed by national implementation of systematic surgical quality control and feedback for radical prostatectomy: a 20-year journey.

Authors:  J Stranne; E Axen; I Franck-Lissbrant; P Fransson; M Frånlund; J Hugosson; A Khatami; K Koss-Modig; P Lodding; M Nyberg; P Stattin; O Bratt
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2019-08-06       Impact factor: 4.226
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.