Literature DB >> 24332236

Conscientious objection to provision of legal abortion care.

Brooke R Johnson1, Eszter Kismödi2, Monica V Dragoman3, Marleen Temmerman3.   

Abstract

Despite advances in scientific evidence, technologies, and human rights rationale for providing safe abortion, a broad range of cultural, regulatory, and health system barriers that deter access to abortion continues to exist in many countries. When conscientious objection to provision of abortion becomes one of these barriers, it can create risks to women's health and the enjoyment of their human rights. To eliminate this barrier, states should implement regulations for healthcare providers on how to invoke conscientious objection without jeopardizing women's access to safe, legal abortion services, especially with regard to timely referral for care and in emergency cases when referral is not possible. In addition, states should take all necessary measures to ensure that all women and adolescents have the means to prevent unintended pregnancies and to obtain safe abortion.
Copyright © 2013 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Abortion; Conscientious objection; Human rights; Maternal health; Women's health

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24332236     DOI: 10.1016/S0020-7292(13)60004-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet        ISSN: 0020-7292            Impact factor:   3.561


  5 in total

1.  Opinions on conscientious objection to induced abortion among Finnish medical and nursing students and professionals.

Authors:  Petteri Nieminen; Saara Lappalainen; Pauliina Ristimäki; Markku Myllykangas; Anne-Mari Mustonen
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2015-03-25       Impact factor: 2.652

2.  "I haven't had to bare my soul but now I kind of have to": describing how voluntary assisted dying conscientious objectors anticipated approaching conversations with patients in Victoria, Australia.

Authors:  Casey Michelle Haining; Louise Anne Keogh
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2021-11-12       Impact factor: 2.652

3.  Mind the Gap: Understanding Differences Between Sexual and Reproductive Health-Related Legal Frameworks on Paper and in Practice.

Authors:  Laura Ferguson; William Jardell; Miles Lambert-Peck; Lillie Guo; Sophia Lopez; Violeta Canaves; Emilie Filmer-Wilson
Journal:  Front Glob Womens Health       Date:  2022-05-06

4.  Attitudes toward safe abortion care and its associated factors among health care providers working in public health facilities in eastern Ethiopia.

Authors:  Tegenu Balcha; Agumasie Semahegn; Dawit Tamiru; Elias Yadeta; Lemesa Abdisa; Gezahegn Tesfaye
Journal:  SAGE Open Med       Date:  2022-06-27

5.  Quotas: Enabling Conscientious Objection to Coexist with Abortion Access.

Authors:  Daniel Rodger; Bruce P Blackshaw
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  2020-11-19
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.