Literature DB >> 24332235

Conscientious objection or fear of social stigma and unawareness of ethical obligations.

Anibal Faúndes1, Graciana Alves Duarte2, Maria José Duarte Osis2.   

Abstract

Conscientious objection is a legitimate right of physicians to reject the practice of actions that violate their ethical or moral principles. The application of that principle is being used in many countries as a justification to deny safe abortion care to women who have the legal right to have access to safe termination of pregnancy. The problem is that, often, this concept is abused by physicians who camouflage under the guise of conscientious objection their fear of experiencing discrimination and social stigma if they perform legal abortions. These colleagues seem to ignore the ethical principle that the primary conscientious duty of OB/GYNs is-at all times-to treat, or provide benefit and prevent harm to, the patients for whose care they are responsible. Any conscientious objection to treating a patient is secondary to this primary duty. One of the jobs of the FIGO Working Group for the Prevention of Unsafe Abortion is to change this paradigm and make our colleagues proud of providing legal abortion services that protect women's life and health, and concerned about disrespecting the human rights of women and professional ethical principles.
Copyright © 2013 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Conscientious objection; Ethical principles; Legal abortion

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24332235     DOI: 10.1016/S0020-7292(13)60003-X

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet        ISSN: 0020-7292            Impact factor:   3.561


  5 in total

1.  Development of a Conceptual Model and Survey Instrument to Measure Conscientious Objection to Abortion Provision.

Authors:  Laura Florence Harris; John Koku Awoonor-Williams; Caitlin Gerdts; Laura Gil Urbano; Ana Cristina González Vélez; Jodi Halpern; Ndola Prata; Peter Baffoe
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-10-13       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  From stigma to pride: health professionals and abortion policies in the Metropolitan Area of Buenos Aires.

Authors:  Sandra Salomé Fernández Vázquez; Josefina Brown
Journal:  Sex Reprod Health Matters       Date:  2019-11

3.  Women's Perceived Barriers to Accessing Post-Abortion Care Services in Selected Districts in KwaZulu Natal Province, South Africa: A Qualitative Study.

Authors:  M Netshinombelo; M S Maputle; D U Ramathuba
Journal:  Ann Glob Health       Date:  2022-08-26       Impact factor: 3.640

4.  Abortion and conscientious objection: rethinking conflicting rights in the Mexican context.

Authors:  Gustavo Ortiz-Millán
Journal:  Glob Bioeth       Date:  2017-12-08

5.  "It's something that marks you": Abortion stigma after decriminalization in Uruguay.

Authors:  Roosbelinda Cárdenas; Ana Labandera; Sarah E Baum; Fernanda Chiribao; Ivana Leus; Silvia Avondet; Jennifer Friedman
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2018-09-10       Impact factor: 3.223

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.