Crispin Leishman1, Philippe Monnier2, Yves Jaquet2. 1. Clinic of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, Lausanne, Switzerland. Electronic address: crispinleishman@gmail.com. 2. Clinic of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To review the presentation and evaluation of laryngotracheoesophageal clefts as well as their treatment modalities, especially endoscopic closure. STUDY DESIGN: retrospective case series. METHODS: All patients treated for laryngotracheoesophageal clefts in our clinic during the last 15 years were included. Analysis of preoperative data, surgical success and functional outcome was performed. RESULTS: A total of 18 patients were included in our study. Cleft distribution was: type I (n=1), type II (n=3), type IIIa (n=5), type IIIb (n=8) and type IVa (n=1). All clefts were closed endoscopically by CO2 laser repair except for two patients who benfited from open surgery (one type I, one type IIIb). 7 of our 18 patients (39%) experienced a complication necessitating reoperation. Surgical treatment of LTEC allowed cessation of feeding tube assistance and artificial ventilation in 47% and 42% of patients respectively. CONCLUSION: Surgical treatement of laryngotracheoesophageal clefts remains a complex procedure with a high rate of morbidity for high grade clefts. Post-surgical difficulties in feeding and breathing are associated with concomitant congenital anomalies. Endoscopic repair is a successful technique for treating up to grade IIIa laryngeal clefts. Further investigation is needed to assess the best approach for treating longer clefts.
OBJECTIVE: To review the presentation and evaluation of laryngotracheoesophageal clefts as well as their treatment modalities, especially endoscopic closure. STUDY DESIGN: retrospective case series. METHODS: All patients treated for laryngotracheoesophageal clefts in our clinic during the last 15 years were included. Analysis of preoperative data, surgical success and functional outcome was performed. RESULTS: A total of 18 patients were included in our study. Cleft distribution was: type I (n=1), type II (n=3), type IIIa (n=5), type IIIb (n=8) and type IVa (n=1). All clefts were closed endoscopically by CO2 laser repair except for two patients who benfited from open surgery (one type I, one type IIIb). 7 of our 18 patients (39%) experienced a complication necessitating reoperation. Surgical treatment of LTEC allowed cessation of feeding tube assistance and artificial ventilation in 47% and 42% of patients respectively. CONCLUSION: Surgical treatement of laryngotracheoesophageal clefts remains a complex procedure with a high rate of morbidity for high grade clefts. Post-surgical difficulties in feeding and breathing are associated with concomitant congenital anomalies. Endoscopic repair is a successful technique for treating up to grade IIIa laryngeal clefts. Further investigation is needed to assess the best approach for treating longer clefts.