Sophie E M Truijens1, Antoinette M Pommer2, Pieter J van Runnard Heimel3, Corine J M Verhoeven3, S Guid Oei3, Victor J M Pop2. 1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Máxima Medical Centre, Veldhoven, The Netherlands. Electronic address: s.truijens@mmc.nl. 2. Department of Medical and Clinical Psychology, Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands. 3. Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Máxima Medical Centre, Veldhoven, The Netherlands.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To develop an instrument to the assess quality of care during pregnancy and delivery as perceived by women who recently gave birth. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective design from focus group interviews to validation of the questionnaire. The focus groups consisted of seven care providers, ten pregnant women and six women who recently gave birth. With the results of the focus group interviews, a draft questionnaire of 52 items was composed and its psychometric properties were tested in a first cohort of 300 women who recently gave birth (sample I) by means of exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and reliability analysis. The final version was further explored by confirmatory factor analyses (CFA) in another sample of 289 women (sample II) with similar characteristics as sample I. RESULTS: EFA in sample I suggested an 18-item scale with two components concerning the quality of care during pregnancy: 'personal treatment' (11 items, Cronbach's alpha (α)=0.87) and 'educational information' (7 items, α=0.90); the 'delivery' scale showed a single domain (7 items, α=0.88). CFA in sample II confirmed both factor structures with an adequate model fit. Overall, satisfaction with care was highest among women who only received midwife-led care, while women who were referred to an obstetrician during pregnancy reported less satisfaction. CONCLUSIONS: The 25-item PCQ, primarily based on the experiences and perceptions of pregnant women and women who recently gave birth, showed adequate psychometric properties evaluating the quality of care during pregnancy and delivery. This user-friendly instrument might be a valuable instrument for future research to further evaluate the quality of care to pregnant women.
OBJECTIVE: To develop an instrument to the assess quality of care during pregnancy and delivery as perceived by women who recently gave birth. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective design from focus group interviews to validation of the questionnaire. The focus groups consisted of seven care providers, ten pregnant women and six women who recently gave birth. With the results of the focus group interviews, a draft questionnaire of 52 items was composed and its psychometric properties were tested in a first cohort of 300 women who recently gave birth (sample I) by means of exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and reliability analysis. The final version was further explored by confirmatory factor analyses (CFA) in another sample of 289 women (sample II) with similar characteristics as sample I. RESULTS: EFA in sample I suggested an 18-item scale with two components concerning the quality of care during pregnancy: 'personal treatment' (11 items, Cronbach's alpha (α)=0.87) and 'educational information' (7 items, α=0.90); the 'delivery' scale showed a single domain (7 items, α=0.88). CFA in sample II confirmed both factor structures with an adequate model fit. Overall, satisfaction with care was highest among women who only received midwife-led care, while women who were referred to an obstetrician during pregnancy reported less satisfaction. CONCLUSIONS: The 25-item PCQ, primarily based on the experiences and perceptions of pregnant women and women who recently gave birth, showed adequate psychometric properties evaluating the quality of care during pregnancy and delivery. This user-friendly instrument might be a valuable instrument for future research to further evaluate the quality of care to pregnant women.
Authors: Jacoba van der Kooy; Nicole B Valentine; Erwin Birnie; Marijana Vujkovic; Johanna P de Graaf; Semiha Denktaş; Eric A P Steegers; Gouke J Bonsel Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2014-12-03 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Franyke R Banga; Sophie E M Truijens; Annemarie F Fransen; Jeanne P Dieleman; Pieter J van Runnard Heimel; Guid S Oei Journal: BMC Med Educ Date: 2014-08-21 Impact factor: 2.463
Authors: Linda Jacqueline Elisabeth Meertens; Hubertina Cj Scheepers; Raymond G De Vries; Carmen D Dirksen; Irene Korstjens; Antonius Lm Mulder; Marianne J Nieuwenhuijze; Jan G Nijhuis; Marc Ea Spaanderman; Luc Jm Smits Journal: JMIR Res Protoc Date: 2017-10-26