Literature DB >> 24331987

Susceptibility of as-yet-uncultivated and difficult-to-culture bacteria to chemomechanical procedures.

Isabela N Rôças1, Mônica A S Neves1, José C Provenzano1, José F Siqueira2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: A significant portion of the bacteria taking part of the microbiome associated with apical periodontitis still remain to be cultivated and phenotypically characterized. This molecular study evaluated the prevalence of selected as-yet-uncultivated and difficult-to-culture bacterial taxa in infected root canals and their susceptibility to chemomechanical procedures.
METHODS: Root canals of single-rooted teeth with apical periodontitis were prepared using rotary nickel-titanium instruments and 2.5% sodium hypochlorite as the irrigant. DNA extracts from samples taken before (S1) and after (S2) chemomechanical preparation were surveyed for the presence of 7 as-yet-uncultivated phylotypes and 1 difficult-to-culture species using end-point polymerase chain reaction. Samples were also subjected to quantitative analysis of total bacteria and levels of the 2 most prevalent taxa.
RESULTS: Bacteroidaceae sp. HOT-272 (24%) and Fretibacterium fastidiosum (20%) were the most prevalent taxa in S1. Their mean counts in S1 were 8.25 × 10(3) and 2.13 × 10(3) rRNA gene copies, corresponding to 0.18% and 0.55% of the total bacteria. Chemomechanical debridement promoted a highly statistically significant reduction in total bacterial counts (P < .001), but 64% of the canals were still positive for bacterial presence. Of the target taxa, only Bacteroidaceae sp. HOT-272 and F. fastidiosum were detected in S2 (each one in 1 sample). The reduction in counts of both taxa was also highly significant (P < .001).
CONCLUSIONS: Findings confirmed that several as-yet-uncultivated and difficult-to-grow bacterial taxa can participate in the microbiome associated with apical periodontitis. Two of them were found in relatively high prevalence but rarely as a dominant species. Chemomechanical procedures were highly effective in completely eliminating these taxa or at least substantially reducing their numbers.
Copyright © 2014 American Association of Endodontists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Apical periodontitis; bacterial reduction; endodontic treatment; molecular microbiology; uncultivated bacteria

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24331987     DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2013.07.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endod        ISSN: 0099-2399            Impact factor:   4.171


  5 in total

1.  Pathogenic potential of Enterococcus faecalis strains isolated from root canals after unsuccessful endodontic treatment.

Authors:  Priscila Amanda Francisco; Pedro Ivo da Graça Fagundes; João Carlos Lemes-Junior; Augusto Rodrigues Lima; Maicon Ricardo Zieberg Passini; Brenda P F A Gomes
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2021-02-09       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Clinical comparison of the effectiveness of 7- and 14-day intracanal medications in root canal disinfection and inflammatory cytokines.

Authors:  Frederico C Martinho; Cinthya C Gomes; Gustavo G Nascimento; Ana P M Gomes; Fábio R M Leite
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2017-06-06       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 3.  Can Probiotics Emerge as Effective Therapeutic Agents in Apical Periodontitis? A Review.

Authors:  Gaurav Kumar; Sanjay Tewari; John Tagg; Michael Leonidas Chikindas; Igor V Popov; Santosh Kumar Tiwari
Journal:  Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins       Date:  2021-02-13       Impact factor: 4.609

4.  Push-out bond strength and dentinal tubule penetration of different root canal sealers used with coated core materials.

Authors:  Derya Deniz Sungur; Nuhan Purali; Erdal Coşgun; Semra Calt
Journal:  Restor Dent Endod       Date:  2016-05-04

5.  Root Microbiota in Primary and Secondary Apical Periodontitis.

Authors:  Serge Bouillaguet; Daniel Manoil; Myriam Girard; Justine Louis; Nadia Gaïa; Stefano Leo; Jacques Schrenzel; Vladimir Lazarevic
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2018-10-09       Impact factor: 5.640

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.