Literature DB >> 24331899

The impacts of marriage, cohabitation and dating relationships on weekly self-reported physical activity in Germany: a 19-year longitudinal study.

Ingmar Rapp1, Björn Schneider2.   

Abstract

Despite the increasing number of non-marital romantic relationships in developed countries, little is known about their effects on health-related behaviors. This paper examined the impact of relationship status (single, dating, cohabiting or married) on physical activity. Three possible mechanisms underlying this association were discussed: social control and support by the partner, time restrictions and the release from the marriage market. Data were obtained from the German Socio-Economic Panel (GSOEP), a random sample of individuals living in private households in Germany. Both random-effects and fixed-effects logit models were estimated. The random-effects analyses referred to 30,201 individuals and the fixed-effects analyses referred to 11,568 individuals who were observed for up to 19 years. After adjusting for age, measurement period and the presence of children, fixed-effects estimates showed reduced physical activity for each type of relationship for both men and women. The effects were strongest for married couples and weakest for dating couples, and remained similar after controlling for discretionary time. However, the effects found partly depended on age: for men, the negative impacts of cohabitation and marriage on physical activity became weaker with increasing age and shifted to positive impacts. For women, the negative effect of marriage on physical activity also decreased but stayed negative into old age. The results suggest that the release from the marriage market may cause the negative effects of relationships on physical activity. Social support and social control may play a role in older age, whereas the amount of discretionary time seems to be of minor importance for explaining relationship effects on physical activity. If the results will be validated by other studies there will be valuable implications for health promotion programs.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cohabitation; Dating relationship; Fixed-effects estimation; GSOEP; Germany; Marriage; Physical activity

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24331899     DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.09.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  10 in total

1.  Life Events and Longitudinal Effects on Physical Activity: Adolescence to Adulthood.

Authors:  Jonathan Miller; Toben Nelson; Daheia J Barr-Anderson; Mary J Christoph; Megan Winkler; Dianne Neumark-Sztainer
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 5.411

2.  Changes in Digital Media Use and Physical Activity in German Young Adults under the Covid-19 Pandemic - A Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Jasmin Helbach; Katharina Stahlmann
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2021-10-01       Impact factor: 2.988

3.  Do Marriage and Cohabitation Provide Benefits to Health in Mid-Life? The Role of Childhood Selection Mechanisms and Partnership Characteristics Across Countries.

Authors:  Brienna Perelli-Harris; Stefanie Hoherz; Fenaba Addo; Trude Lappegård; Ann Evans; Sharon Sassler; Marta Styrc
Journal:  Popul Res Policy Rev       Date:  2018-04-23

4.  Physical activity, sedentary behaviour and smoking status among psychiatric patients in Singapore - a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Vanessa Seet; Edimansyah Abdin; P V Asharani; Ying Ying Lee; Kumarasan Roystonn; Peizhi Wang; Fiona Devi; Laxman Cetty; Wen Lin Teh; Swapna Verma; Yee Ming Mok; Mythily Subramaniam
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2021-02-18       Impact factor: 3.630

Review 5.  Cohabitation and marriage during the transition between adolescence and emerging adulthood: A systematic review of changes in weight-related outcomes, diet and physical activity.

Authors:  André O Werneck; Eleanor M Winpenny; Campbell Foubister; Justin M Guagliano; Alex G Monnickendam; Esther M F van Sluijs; Kirsten Corder
Journal:  Prev Med Rep       Date:  2020-11-28

6.  Levels of Physical Activity in Spanish Asthmatics: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Sheila Sánchez Castillo; Lee Smith; Arturo Díaz Suárez; Guillermo Felipe López Sánchez
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2020-11-25       Impact factor: 2.430

7.  Mental health and satisfaction with partners: a longitudinal analysis in the UK.

Authors:  Paul Downward; Simona Rasciute; Harish Kumar
Journal:  BMC Psychol       Date:  2022-01-27

8.  Physical activity and socio-economic status of single and married urban adults: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Daniel Puciato; Michał Rozpara
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2021-11-09       Impact factor: 2.984

9.  Do singles or couples live healthier lifestyles? Trends in Queensland between 2005-2014.

Authors:  Stephanie Schoeppe; Corneel Vandelanotte; Amanda L Rebar; Melanie Hayman; Mitch J Duncan; Stephanie J Alley
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-02-28       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  The impact of body mass index and sociodemographic factors on moderate-to-vigorous physical activity and sedentary behaviors of women with young children: A cross-sectional examination.

Authors:  Danae M Dinkel; Nicholas Hein; Kailey Snyder; Mohammad Siahpush; Shannon Maloney; Lynette Smith; Paraskevi A Farazi; Corrine Hanson
Journal:  Womens Health (Lond)       Date:  2020 Jan-Dec
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.