Literature DB >> 24331615

Comparison of a synthetic chemical lure and standard fermented baits for trapping Drosophila suzukii (Diptera: Drosophilidae).

Dong H Cha1, Stephen P Hesler, Richard S Cowles, Heidrun Vogt, Gregory M Loeb, Peter J Landolt.   

Abstract

We determined the attractiveness of a new chemical lure compared with fermented food baits in use for trapping Drosophila suzukii Matsumura, spotted wing drosophila (Diptera: Drosophilidae), in Connecticut, New York, and Washington in the United States and at Dossenheim in Germany. The chemical lure (SWD lure) and food baits were compared in two types of traps: the dome trap and a cup trap. Regardless of trap type, numbers of male and female D. suzukii trapped were greater with the SWD lure compared with apple cider vinegar (ACV) baits at the Washington and New York sites, and were comparable with numbers of D. suzukii captured with a wine plus vinegar bait (W + V) at Germany site and a combination bait meant to mimic W + V at the Connecticut site. Averaged over both types of attractants, the numbers of D. suzukii captured were greater in dome traps than in cup traps in New York and Connecticut for both male and female D. suzukii and in Washington for male D. suzukii. No such differences were found between trap types at the Washington site for female and Germany for male and female D. suzukii. Assessments were also made of the number of large (>0.5 cm) and small (<0.5 cm) nontarget flies trapped. The SWD lure captured fewer nontarget small flies and more large flies compared with ACV bait in New York and fewer nontarget small flies compared with W + V in Germany, although no such differences were found in Washington for the SWD lure versus ACV bait and in Connecticut for the SWD lure versus the combination bait, indicating that these effects are likely influenced by the local nontarget insect community active at the time of trapping. In New York, Connecticut, and Germany, dome traps caught more nontarget flies compared with cup traps. Our results suggest that the four-component SWD chemical lure is an effective attractant for D. suzukii and could be used in place of fermented food-type baits.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24331615     DOI: 10.1603/EN13154

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Entomol        ISSN: 0046-225X            Impact factor:   2.377


  9 in total

1.  Identification and Optimization of Microbial Attractants for Philornis downsi, an Invasive Fly Parasitic on Galapagos Birds.

Authors:  Dong H Cha; Alejandro E Mieles; Paola F Lahuatte; Andrea Cahuana; Marie Piedad Lincango; Charlotte E Causton; Sabine Tebbich; Arno Cimadom; Stephen A Teale
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2016-10-15       Impact factor: 2.626

Review 2.  Advances in the Chemical Ecology of the Spotted Wing Drosophila (Drosophila suzukii) and its Applications.

Authors:  Kevin R Cloonan; John Abraham; Sergio Angeli; Zainulabeuddin Syed; Cesar Rodriguez-Saona
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2018-07-27       Impact factor: 2.626

3.  Olfactory specialization in Drosophila suzukii supports an ecological shift in host preference from rotten to fresh fruit.

Authors:  Ian W Keesey; Markus Knaden; Bill S Hansson
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2015-01-25       Impact factor: 2.626

4.  The Evolution of Olfactory Gene Families in Drosophila and the Genomic Basis of chemical-Ecological Adaptation in Drosophila suzukii.

Authors:  Sukanya Ramasamy; Lino Ometto; Cristina M Crava; Santosh Revadi; Rupinder Kaur; David S Horner; Davide Pisani; Teun Dekker; Gianfranco Anfora; Omar Rota-Stabelli
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2016-08-16       Impact factor: 3.416

5.  Peppermint essential oil inhibits Drosophila suzukii emergence but reduces Pachycrepoideus vindemmiae parasitism rates.

Authors:  Chelsea Megan Gowton; Michał Reut; Juli Carrillo
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-06-04       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Volatiles of Grape Inoculated with Microorganisms: Modulation of Grapevine Moth Oviposition and Field Attraction.

Authors:  Marco Tasin; Sebastian Larsson Herrera; Alan L Knight; Wilson Barros-Parada; Eduardo Fuentes Contreras; Ilaria Pertot
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2018-03-10       Impact factor: 4.552

7.  Hanseniaspora uvarum Attracts Drosophila suzukii (Diptera: Drosophilidae) With High Specificity.

Authors:  Isabella Kleman; Guillermo Rehermann; Charles A Kwadha; Peter Witzgall; Paul G Becher
Journal:  J Econ Entomol       Date:  2022-08-10       Impact factor: 2.447

8.  Identification of attractive blend for spotted wing drosophila, Drosophila suzukii, from apple juice.

Authors:  Yan Feng; Robert Bruton; Alexis Park; Aijun Zhang
Journal:  J Pest Sci (2004)       Date:  2018-06-22       Impact factor: 5.918

9.  Mass Trapping Drosophila suzukii, What Would It Take? A Two-Year Field Study on Trap Interference.

Authors:  Rik Clymans; Vincent Van Kerckvoorde; Tom Thys; Patrick De Clercq; Dany Bylemans; Tim Beliën
Journal:  Insects       Date:  2022-02-28       Impact factor: 2.769

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.