Eva Helaskoski1, Hille Suojalehto2, Hannele Virtanen3, Liisa Airaksinen2, Outi Kuuliala2, Kristiina Aalto-Korte2, Maria Pesonen2. 1. Department of Occupational Medicine, Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, Helsinki, Finland; Department of Public Health, Hjelt Institute, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland. Electronic address: eva.helaskoski@ttl.fi. 2. Control of Hypersensitivity Diseases, Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, Helsinki, Finland. 3. Skin and Allergy Hospital, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Oxidative hair dyes commonly contain paraphenylene diamine (PPD) and its derivatives, a well-known cause of delayed hypersensitivity among both consumers and hairdressers. They are also considered possible causes of occupational respiratory diseases. Despite the widespread use of hair dyes, there are only a few reports of asthma, rhinitis, and contact urticaria caused by PPD and related compounds. OBJECTIVE: To characterize patients with occupational asthma, rhinitis, or contact urticaria associated with oxidative hair dyes and to evaluate the diagnostic methods. METHODS: We reviewed the patient files of the Finnish Institute of Occupational Health for the period January 1, 2001, through May 31, 2011, to identify patients diagnosed as having asthma, rhinitis, or contact urticaria associated with oxidative hair dyes. The diagnoses of asthma and rhinitis were based on specific inhalation challenges with hair dye products. Skin prick tests were performed with hair dye ingredients as hapten conjugates of human serum albumin and with hair dye products and ingredients as is. Open skin tests confirmed the diagnosis of contact urticaria. RESULTS: We describe 11 hairdressers with occupational asthma (5 cases), rhinitis (5 cases), and contact urticaria (3 cases) due to hair dyes. Of the 52 specific inhalation challenges performed, 9 (17%) had positive results. One patient who experienced an anaphylactic reaction when having her own hair dyed had positive skin prick test results to PPD and toluene-2,5-diamine sulfate. CONCLUSION: Hairdressers are at risk for occupational asthma, rhinitis, and contact urticaria due to oxidative hair dyes. Skin prick testing may be insensitive for detecting immediate hypersensitivity to PPD and related compounds.
BACKGROUND: Oxidative hair dyes commonly contain paraphenylene diamine (PPD) and its derivatives, a well-known cause of delayed hypersensitivity among both consumers and hairdressers. They are also considered possible causes of occupational respiratory diseases. Despite the widespread use of hair dyes, there are only a few reports of asthma, rhinitis, and contact urticaria caused by PPD and related compounds. OBJECTIVE: To characterize patients with occupational asthma, rhinitis, or contact urticaria associated with oxidative hair dyes and to evaluate the diagnostic methods. METHODS: We reviewed the patient files of the Finnish Institute of Occupational Health for the period January 1, 2001, through May 31, 2011, to identify patients diagnosed as having asthma, rhinitis, or contact urticaria associated with oxidative hair dyes. The diagnoses of asthma and rhinitis were based on specific inhalation challenges with hair dye products. Skin prick tests were performed with hair dye ingredients as hapten conjugates of human serum albumin and with hair dye products and ingredients as is. Open skin tests confirmed the diagnosis of contact urticaria. RESULTS: We describe 11 hairdressers with occupational asthma (5 cases), rhinitis (5 cases), and contact urticaria (3 cases) due to hair dyes. Of the 52 specific inhalation challenges performed, 9 (17%) had positive results. One patient who experienced an anaphylactic reaction when having her own hair dyed had positive skin prick test results to PPD and toluene-2,5-diamine sulfate. CONCLUSION: Hairdressers are at risk for occupational asthma, rhinitis, and contact urticaria due to oxidative hair dyes. Skin prick testing may be insensitive for detecting immediate hypersensitivity to PPD and related compounds.
Authors: Ju Hee Han; Hyun Ji Lee; Chul Hwan Bang; Ji Hyun Lee; Young Min Park; Jun Young Lee Journal: Ann Dermatol Date: 2018-04-23 Impact factor: 1.444
Authors: Tiina Mattila; Tiina Santonen; Helle Raun Andersen; Andromachi Katsonouri; Tamás Szigeti; Maria Uhl; Wojciech Wąsowicz; Rosa Lange; Beatrice Bocca; Flavia Ruggieri; Marike Kolossa-Gehring; Denis A Sarigiannis; Hanna Tolonen Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-02-01 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: A K Fell; R Abrahamsen; P K Henneberger; M V Svendsen; E Andersson; K Torén; J Kongerud Journal: Occup Environ Med Date: 2016-06-30 Impact factor: 4.402