Literature DB >> 24331167

Comparison between laparoscopic and open radical nephrectomy for the treatment of primary renal tumors in children: single-center experience over a 5-year period.

R L P Romao1, B Weber2, J T Gerstle3, R Grant4, J L Pippi Salle5, D J Bägli5, V H Figueroa5, L H P Braga6, W A Farhat5, M A Koyle5, A J Lorenzo7.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To compare the outcomes of laparoscopic nephrectomy (LN) with open radical nephrectomy (ORN) in the management of consecutive pediatric neoplasms. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of consecutive children treated for primary renal tumors between 2006 and 2011, segregated based on surgical modality (LN/ORN). Pre-, intra- and postoperative data and outcomes were collected.
RESULTS: Demographics from the 45 patients (13 LN, 32 ORN) were similar, and tumors in the LN group were smaller [6.59 ± 1.8 cm vs. 10.99 ± 2.99 cm ORN (p < 0.05)]. Six patients had preoperative chemotherapy (two LN, four ORN). No tumor ruptures occurred with either technique. Wilms tumor (seven LN, 24 ORN) was the most common diagnosis, followed by renal cell carcinoma (four LN, four ORN). Procedure length was similar between groups (282 ± 79 LN, 263 ± 81 min ORN). Mean length of stay was significantly shorter for LN (2.9 vs. 5.9 days; p = 0.002). Postoperative narcotic requirements and use of nasogastric tube were higher in the ORN group. After a median follow-up of 18 (LN) and 33 months (ORN), 1 and 4 recurrences occurred, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: LN is an attractive alternative to open surgery in carefully selected cases of pediatric renal tumors. Procedure length and incidence of intra-operative rupture were not increased, while post-operative recovery and hospital stay were shorter for LN. Longer follow-up is mandatory to confirm comparable oncological outcomes to ORN.
Copyright © 2013 Journal of Pediatric Urology Company. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Children; Laparoscopy; Nephrectomy; Renal neoplasm; Wilms' tumor

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24331167     DOI: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2013.11.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr Urol        ISSN: 1477-5131            Impact factor:   1.830


  7 in total

1.  Open versus minimally invasive surgical approaches in pediatric urology: Trends in utilization and complications.

Authors:  Rohit Tejwani; Brian J Young; Hsin-Hsiao S Wang; Steven Wolf; J Todd Purves; John S Wiener; Jonathan C Routh
Journal:  J Pediatr Urol       Date:  2017-02-22       Impact factor: 1.830

Review 2.  Minimally invasive surgery in management of renal tumours in children.

Authors:  Kathrine Olaussen Eriksen; Navroop Singh Johal; Imran Mushtaq
Journal:  Transl Pediatr       Date:  2016-10

3.  International Society of Paediatric Surgical Oncology (IPSO) Surgical Practice Guidelines.

Authors:  Simone de Campos Vieira Abib; Chan Hon Chui; Sharon Cox; Abdelhafeez H Abdelhafeez; Israel Fernandez-Pineda; Ahmed Elgendy; Jonathan Karpelowsky; Pablo Lobos; Marc Wijnen; Jörg Fuchs; Andrea Hayes; Justin T Gerstle
Journal:  Ecancermedicalscience       Date:  2022-02-17

4.  Open versus minimally-invasive surgical techniques in pediatric renal tumors: A population-level analysis of in-hospital outcomes.

Authors:  Kirsten L Simmons; Jason C Chandrapal; Steven Wolf; Henry E Rice; Elisabeth E Tracy; Tamara Fitzgerald; Gina-Maria Pomann; Jonathan C Routh
Journal:  J Pediatr Urol       Date:  2021-03-19       Impact factor: 1.921

5.  Laparoscopic Versus Open Radical Nephrectomy for Renal Cell Carcinoma: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Gang Liu; Yulei Ma; Shouhua Wang; Xiancheng Han; Dianjun Gao
Journal:  Transl Oncol       Date:  2017-05-24       Impact factor: 4.243

6.  Ossifying Renal Tumor of Infancy: Laparoscopic Treatment and Literature Review.

Authors:  Ali Hajiran; Morris Jessop; Zachary Werner; Chad Crigger; John Barnard; Jeffrey Vos; Michael Ost
Journal:  Case Rep Urol       Date:  2018-10-23

7.  Renal cell carcinoma in children and adolescents: Single-center experience and literature review.

Authors:  Min He; Jiabin Cai; Kun Zhu; Weizhong Gu; Minju Li; Jieni Xiong; Zhonghai Guan; Jinhu Wang; Qiang Shu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-01-15       Impact factor: 1.817

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.