| Literature DB >> 24330735 |
Belgacem Mihi, Frederik Van Meulder, Manuela Rinaldi, Stefanie Van Coppernolle, Koen Chiers, Wim Van den Broeck, Bruno Goddeeris, Jozef Vercruysse, Edwin Claerebout, Peter Geldhof1.
Abstract
Infections in cattle with the gastric nematode Ostertagia ostertagi are associated with decreased acid secretion and profound physio-morphological changes of the gastric mucosa. The purpose of the current study was to investigate the mechanisms triggering these pathophysiological changes. O. ostertagi infection resulted in a marked cellular hyperplasia, which can be explained by increased transcriptional levels of signaling molecules related to the homeostasis of gastric epithelial cells such as HES1, WNT5A, FGF10, HB-EGF, AREG, ADAM10 and ADAM17. Intriguingly, histological analysis indicated that the rapid rise in the gastric pH, observed following the emergence of adult worms, cannot be explained by a loss of parietal cells, as a decrease in the number of parietal cells was only observed following a long term infection of several weeks, but is likely to be caused by an inhibition of parietal cell activity. To investigate whether this inhibition is caused by a direct effect of the parasites, parietal cells were co-cultured with parasite Excretory/Secretory products (ESP) and subsequently analyzed for acid production. The results indicate that adult ESP inhibited acid secretion, whereas ESP from the L4 larval stages did not alter parietal cell function. In addition, our data show that the inhibition of parietal cell activity could be mediated by a marked upregulation of inflammatory factors, which are partly induced by adult ESP in abomasal epithelial cells. In conclusion, this study shows that the emergence of adult O. ostertagi worms is associated with marked cellular changes that can be partly triggered by the worm's Excretory/secretory antigens.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2013 PMID: 24330735 PMCID: PMC3878833 DOI: 10.1186/1297-9716-44-121
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Vet Res ISSN: 0928-4249 Impact factor: 3.683
Figure 1Representative pictures of fundic sections stained for the proliferation marker Ki67. Proliferative nuclei are stained in green. UNINF: uninfected, dpi: days post infection, dpe: days post exposure (Scale bar = 100 μm).
Effect of an on transcript levels of signaling network components involved in gastric cell homeostasis (mean fold difference compared to uninfected calves ± SEM)
| | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| | |||||
| 2.61 ± 1.3 | 4.47 ± 0.68* | 7.12 ± 1.33* | 6.45 ± 1.11** | 5.13 ± 1.31* | |
| 3.57 ± 1.78* | 4.01 ± 0.82* | 11.40 ± 1.58* | 7.79 ± 0.77** | 8.86 ± 2.48* | |
| 2 ± 0.2 | 2.34 ± 0.43 | 4.33 ± 0.45* | 1.83 ± 0.13** | 2.58 ± 0.46* | |
| 1.79 ± 0.24* | 2.07 ± 0.34* | 2.3 ± 0.3* | 3.20 ± 0.36** | 1.97 ± 0.2* | |
| 1.66 ± 0.83* | 2.44 ± 0.6* | 2.64 ± 0.68* | 1.76 ± 0.19 | 2.14 ± 0.22* | |
| 1.96 ± 0.25* | 2.16 ± 0.29* | 3.5 ± 0.6* | 2.41 ± 0.25** | 2.66 ± 0.26* | |
| 1.93 ± 0.17* | 1.92 ± 0.31* | 3.09 ± 0.22* | 2.76 ± 0.30** | 2.01 ± 0.31* | |
| 2.25 ± 0.68 | 2.26 ± 1.06 | 1.98 ± 0.49 | 2.93 ± 0.61** | 1.81 ± 0.44 | |
| 1.31 ± 0.16 | 1.7 ± 0.36 | 1.63 ± 0.14 | 1.69 ± 0.15 | 1.26 ± 0.09 | |
| 2.27 ± 0.33 | 2.87 ± 1.78 | 1.95 ± 0.31 | 1.44 ± 0.26 | 2.94 ± 0.31* | |
| 1.7 ± 0.22 | 1.13 ± 0.05 | 0.85 ± 0.15 | 0.61 ± 0.01** | 0.72 ± 0.15 | |
*p value ≤ 0.05 uninfected animals vs infected animals.
**p value ≤ 0.01 uninfected animals vs infected animals.
Figure 2Impact of an infection on parietal cell numbers. Parietal cells are visualized in fundic sections by immunostaining for ATP4A. Parietal cells are stained in green. UNINF: uninfected, dpi: days post infection, dpe: days post exposure (Scale bar = 100 μm).
Effect of an on transcript levels of physiologic gastric acid secretion regulators (Mean fold difference compared to uninfected calves ± SEM)
| | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| | |||||
| 1.62 ± 0.35 | 0.75 ± 0.08 | 0.49 ± 0.14 | 0.67 ± 0.04 | 0.29 ± 0.05* | |
| 1.05 ± 0.53 | 0.99 ± 0.25 | 0.88 ± 0.08 | 0.64 ± 0.02** | 0.42 ± 0.06* | |
| 1.56 ± 0.17 | 1.11 ± 0.18 | 1.42 ± 0.24 | 1.27 ± 0.04 | 1.6 ± 0.25 | |
| 1.57 ± 0.07* | 1.33 ± 0.17 | 1.83 ± 0.4 | 0.94 ± 0.05 | 1.53 ± 0.37 | |
| 2.18 ± 0.23* | 1.1 ± 0.24 | 1.34 ± 0.21 | 0.92 ± 0.09 | 0.69 ± 0.08 | |
| 0.95 ± 0.22 | 1.39 ± 0.35 | 0.59 ± 0.15 | 0.70 ± 0.5* | 0.72 ± 0.1 | |
*p value ≤ 0.05 uninfected animals vs infected animals.
**p value ≤ 0.01 uninfected animals vs infected animals.
Figure 3Effect of histamine and carbachol treatment on ATP4A cytoplasmic distribution in cultured rabbit and bovine parietal cells. Parietal cells were treated with histamine (10–5 M), carbachol (10–5 M) or PBS for 30 minutes prior to ATP4A staining. (Scale bar = 10 μm).
Figure 4Impact of ESP on parietal cell activity. (A) Cultured rabbit parietal cells were pre-incubated with parasite ESP at different concentrations for 24 h, and then stimulated with histamine (10–5 M) or carbachol (10–5 M) for 15 min. Quantitation of acid-secretion was measured using 9-aminoacridine accumulation as described in the material and methods. Data are expressed as percentages (means ± SEM) of secretory index in histamine or carbachol stimulated parietal cells in the absence of ESP treatment. (B) Quantification of acid secretion in histamine stimulated rabbit parietal cells following 24 h of pre-incubation with native adult extract, adult ESP and boiled ESP at 100 μg/mL (C) Quantification of acid secretion following 15 min and 24 h of incubation with adult ESP. (D) Quantification of acid secretion in dbcAMP stimulated rabbit parietal cells following 24 h of preincubation with 100 μg/mL adult ESP. Data are expressed as percentages (means ± SEM) of secretory index in dbcAMP or carbachol stimulated parietal cells in the absence of ESP treatment. (**p value ≤ 0.01, ***p value ≤ 0.001).
Effect of an on transcript levels of inflammatory-related genes (Mean fold difference compared to uninfected calves ± SEM)
| | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| | |||||
| 3.01 ± 1.29 | 5.96 ± 0.84* | 35.37 ± 10.77* | 3.52 ± 0.49* | 5.51 ± 1.86 | |
| 3.11 ± 1.8 | 5.52 ± 1.6* | 50.68 ± 14* | 8.53 ± 1.55** | 9.65 ± 2.66* | |
| 1.81 ± 0.41 | 2.02 ± 0.31 | 5.44 ± 1.32 | 2.20 ± 0.0381* | 3.76 ± 1.06 | |
| 1.05 ± 0.1 | 1.65 ± 0.2 | 6.45 ± 1.67* | 2.92 ± 0.36** | 1.69 ± 0.22 | |
*p value ≤ 0.05 uninfected animals vs infected animals.
**p value ≤ 0.01 uninfected animals vs infected animals.
Figure 5Impact of ESP on the transcription of inflammatory factors in bovine epithelial cells. Relative expression levels of IL1B, IL8, TNFA and COX-2 were quantified in cultured bovine mucous epithelial cells following preincubation for 24 h with O. ostertagi adult and L4 ESP at different concentrations. In addition, cells were treated with 8 ug/mL LPS corresponding to the highest concentration of LPS contamination present in the ESP. Relative expression levels were normalized against RSP 29 and expressed as mean fold change ± SE. (*p value ≤ 0.05).