Literature DB >> 24330687

Guidelines for community-based partners for reviewing research grant applications: lessons from the Michigan Institute for Clinical and Health Research (MICHR) Community Engagement Research Core (CERC).

Robert M Anderson1, Karen Calhoun, Celeste B Choate, E Hill De Loney, Adam Paberzs, Carolyn M Sampselle, Donald R Vereen, Marc A Zimmerman.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24330687      PMCID: PMC3925334          DOI: 10.1111/cts.12126

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Transl Sci        ISSN: 1752-8054            Impact factor:   4.689


× No keyword cloud information.
  3 in total

1.  Clinical translational science awards: opportunities and challenges.

Authors:  Susan B Shurin
Journal:  Clin Transl Sci       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 4.689

Review 2.  Community-engaged scholarship: is faculty work in communities a true academic enterprise?

Authors:  Diane C Calleson; Catherine Jordan; Sarena D Seifer
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 6.893

3.  The meaning of translational research and why it matters.

Authors:  Steven H Woolf
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2008-01-09       Impact factor: 56.272

  3 in total
  2 in total

1.  Reviewer training to assess knowledge translation in funding applications is long overdue.

Authors:  Gayle Scarrow; Donna Angus; Bev J Holmes
Journal:  Res Integr Peer Rev       Date:  2017-08-01

2.  Exploring the potential role of community engagement in evaluating clinical and translational science grant proposals.

Authors:  Jeffrey W Treem; Margaret Schneider; Robynn L Zender; Dara H Sorkin
Journal:  J Clin Transl Sci       Date:  2018-09-18
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.