OBJECTIVE: Continuous lumbar plexus blocks provide excellent analgesia for total hip arthroplasty (THA), but their utility has been questioned as they may increase motor weakness. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of two different concentrations of ropivacaine on both postoperative analgesia and motor function. METHODS:Thirty patients were examined in this prospective, single center, double-blinded, parallel group, comparative, randomized controlled trial in patients undergoing primary THA. Lumbar plexus catheters were inserted preoperatively. After surgery, patients were randomly assigned to receive an infusion of ropivacaine at a concentration of either 0.1% (group 0.1%) or 0.2% (group 0.2%) at a standardized volume of 7 mL per hour for 24 hours. Patients were also given free access to patient-controlled analgesia hydromorphone for 24 hours, supplemental intravenous (IV) opiates, and boluses of their assigned local anesthetic concentration via the lumbar plexus catheter. The primary endpoint was total hydromorphone consumption in 24 hours. Secondary endpoints included pain scores, sensory and motor function, and patient satisfaction. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in hydromorphone consumption in the first 24 hours postoperatively (mean [95% confidence interval]) between group 0.1% (8.02 mg [6.02-10.02]) and group 0.2% (8.21 mg [5.75-10.69], P = 0.90). The volume of local anesthetic received, pain scores, sensory and motor function, and patient satisfaction did not vary between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Following primary THA, lumbar plexus perineural infusion of 0.1% ropivacaine provided similar benefits for postoperative analgesia and functional recovery as 0.2% ropivacaine. Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: Continuous lumbar plexus blocks provide excellent analgesia for total hip arthroplasty (THA), but their utility has been questioned as they may increase motor weakness. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of two different concentrations of ropivacaine on both postoperative analgesia and motor function. METHODS: Thirty patients were examined in this prospective, single center, double-blinded, parallel group, comparative, randomized controlled trial in patients undergoing primary THA. Lumbar plexus catheters were inserted preoperatively. After surgery, patients were randomly assigned to receive an infusion of ropivacaine at a concentration of either 0.1% (group 0.1%) or 0.2% (group 0.2%) at a standardized volume of 7 mL per hour for 24 hours. Patients were also given free access to patient-controlled analgesia hydromorphone for 24 hours, supplemental intravenous (IV) opiates, and boluses of their assigned local anesthetic concentration via the lumbar plexus catheter. The primary endpoint was total hydromorphone consumption in 24 hours. Secondary endpoints included pain scores, sensory and motor function, and patient satisfaction. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in hydromorphone consumption in the first 24 hours postoperatively (mean [95% confidence interval]) between group 0.1% (8.02 mg [6.02-10.02]) and group 0.2% (8.21 mg [5.75-10.69], P = 0.90). The volume of local anesthetic received, pain scores, sensory and motor function, and patient satisfaction did not vary between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Following primary THA, lumbar plexus perineural infusion of 0.1% ropivacaine provided similar benefits for postoperative analgesia and functional recovery as 0.2% ropivacaine. Wiley Periodicals, Inc.