Literature DB >> 24330327

Field performance of transgenic sugarcane produced using Agrobacterium and biolistics methods.

Priya Joyce1, Scott Hermann, Anthony O'Connell, Quang Dinh, Leonard Shumbe, Prakash Lakshmanan.   

Abstract

Future genetic improvement of sugarcane depends, in part, on the ability to produce high-yielding transgenic cultivars with improved traits such as herbicide and insect resistance. Here, transgenic sugarcane plants generated by different transformation methods were assessed for field performance over 3 years. Agrobacterium-mediated (Agro) transgenic events (35) were produced using four different Agrobacterium tumefaciens strains, while biolistic (Biol) transgenic events (48) were produced using either minimal linearized DNA (LDNA) transgene cassettes with 5', 3' or blunt ends or whole circular plasmid (PDNA) vectors containing the same transgenes. A combined analysis showed a reduction in growth and cane yield in Biol, Agro as well as untransformed tissue culture (TC) events, compared with the parent clone (PC) Q117 (no transformation or tissue culture) in the plant, first ratoon and second ratoon crops. However, when individual events were analysed separately, yields of some transgenic events from both Agro and Biol were comparable to PC, suggesting that either transformation method can produce commercially suitable clones. Interestingly, a greater percentage of Biol transformants were similar to PC for growth and yield than Agro clones. Crop ratoonability and sugar yield components (Brix%, Pol%, and commercial cane sugar (CCS)) were unaffected by transformation or tissue culture. Transgene expression remained stable over different crop cycles and increased with plant maturity. Transgene copy number did not influence transgene expression, and both transformation methods produced low transgene copy number events. No consistent pattern of genetic changes was detected in the test population using three DNA fingerprinting techniques.
© 2013 Society for Experimental Biology, Association of Applied Biologists and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Agrobacterium; agronomic; biolistic; field; sugarcane; transformation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24330327     DOI: 10.1111/pbi.12148

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plant Biotechnol J        ISSN: 1467-7644            Impact factor:   9.803


  11 in total

1.  Agrobacterium-mediated in planta genetic transformation of sugarcane setts.

Authors:  Subramanian Mayavan; Kondeti Subramanyam; Balusamy Jaganath; Dorairaj Sathish; Markandan Manickavasagam; Andy Ganapathi
Journal:  Plant Cell Rep       Date:  2015-07-08       Impact factor: 4.570

2.  Novel approaches to circumvent the devastating effects of pests on sugarcane.

Authors:  Zahida Qamar; Idrees Ahmad Nasir; Mounir G Abouhaidar; Kathleen L Hefferon; Abdul Qayyum Rao; Ayesha Latif; Qurban Ali; Saima Anwar; Bushra Rashid; Ahmad Ali Shahid
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-14       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 3.  Advances in Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated genetic transformation of graminaceous crops.

Authors:  Roshan Kumar Singh; Manoj Prasad
Journal:  Protoplasma       Date:  2015-12-10       Impact factor: 3.356

4.  Long-term T-DNA insert stability and transgene expression consistency in field propagated sugarcane.

Authors:  Kerry Hosmer Caffall; Chengkun He; Michele Smith-Jones; Kristin Mayo; Pearl Mai; Shujie Dong; John Ke; Erik Dunder; Michele Yarnall; Rachel Whinna; Joe DeMaio; Weining Gu; Judith Sheldon; Martin Allen; Tricia Costello; Kristin Setliff; Rakesh Jain; Ada Snyder; Clark Lovelady; Eric Rawls; Eric Palmer; Yan Zhang; Nicholas Bate; Liang Shi; Ian Jepson
Journal:  Plant Mol Biol       Date:  2016-12-28       Impact factor: 4.076

5.  Physiological and transcriptional analyses of developmental stages along sugarcane leaf.

Authors:  Lucia Mattiello; Diego Mauricio Riaño-Pachón; Marina Camara Mattos Martins; Larissa Prado da Cruz; Denis Bassi; Paulo Eduardo Ribeiro Marchiori; Rafael Vasconcelos Ribeiro; Mônica T Veneziano Labate; Carlos Alberto Labate; Marcelo Menossi
Journal:  BMC Plant Biol       Date:  2015-12-29       Impact factor: 4.215

6.  Field Performance of Transgenic Sugarcane Lines Resistant to Sugarcane Mosaic Virus.

Authors:  Wei Yao; Miaohong Ruan; Lifang Qin; Chuanyu Yang; Rukai Chen; Baoshan Chen; Muqing Zhang
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2017-02-08       Impact factor: 5.753

7.  Foreign cry1Ac gene integration and endogenous borer stress-related genes synergistically improve insect resistance in sugarcane.

Authors:  Dinggang Zhou; Xiaolan Liu; Shiwu Gao; Jinlong Guo; Yachun Su; Hui Ling; Chunfeng Wang; Zhu Li; Liping Xu; Youxiong Que
Journal:  BMC Plant Biol       Date:  2018-12-10       Impact factor: 4.215

8.  A sugarcane pathogenesis-related protein, ScPR10, plays a positive role in defense responses under Sporisorium scitamineum, SrMV, SA, and MeJA stresses.

Authors:  Qiong Peng; Yachun Su; Hui Ling; Waqar Ahmad; Shiwu Gao; Jinlong Guo; Youxiong Que; Liping Xu
Journal:  Plant Cell Rep       Date:  2017-06-20       Impact factor: 4.570

9.  TALEN-mediated targeted mutagenesis of more than 100 COMT copies/alleles in highly polyploid sugarcane improves saccharification efficiency without compromising biomass yield.

Authors:  Baskaran Kannan; Je Hyeong Jung; Geoffrey W Moxley; Sun-Mi Lee; Fredy Altpeter
Journal:  Plant Biotechnol J       Date:  2017-11-18       Impact factor: 9.803

10.  ScGAI is a key regulator of culm development in sugarcane.

Authors:  Rafael Garcia Tavares; Prakash Lakshmanan; Edgar Peiter; Anthony O'Connell; Camila Caldana; Renato Vicentini; José Sérgio Soares; Marcelo Menossi
Journal:  J Exp Bot       Date:  2018-07-18       Impact factor: 6.992

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.