OBJECTIVE: Since a poor diet is often cited as a contributor to metabolic syndrome for subjects diagnosed with bipolar disorder and schizophrenia, we sought to examine dietary intake, cigarette smoking, and physical activity in these populations and compare them with those for the general population. METHODS: Individuals diagnosed with bipolar disorder (n = 116) and schizophrenia (n = 143) were assessed for dietary intake, lifestyle habits, and metabolic syndrome and compared to age-, gender-, and race-matched subjects from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 1999-2000. Additionally, matched subgroups within the patient populations were compared to elicit any differences. RESULTS: As expected, the metabolic syndrome rate was higher in the samples with bipolar disorder (33%) and schizophrenia (47%) compared to matched NHANES controls (17% and 11%, respectively), and not different between the patient groups. Surprisingly, both subjects with bipolar disorder and those with schizophrenia consumed fewer total calories, carbohydrates and fats, as well as more fiber (p < 0.03), compared to NHANES controls. No dietary or activity differences between patient participants with and without metabolic syndrome were found. Subjects with schizophrenia had significantly lower total and low-density cholesterol levels (p < 0.0001) compared to NHANES controls. Subjects with bipolar disorder smoked less (p = 0.001), exercised more (p = 0.004), and had lower body mass indexes (p = 0.009) compared to subjects with schizophrenia. CONCLUSIONS: Counter to predictions, few dietary differences could be discerned between schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and NHANES control groups. The subjects with bipolar disorder exhibited healthier behaviors than the patients with schizophrenia. Additional research regarding metabolic syndrome mechanisms, focusing on non-dietary contributions, is needed.
OBJECTIVE: Since a poor diet is often cited as a contributor to metabolic syndrome for subjects diagnosed with bipolar disorder and schizophrenia, we sought to examine dietary intake, cigarette smoking, and physical activity in these populations and compare them with those for the general population. METHODS: Individuals diagnosed with bipolar disorder (n = 116) and schizophrenia (n = 143) were assessed for dietary intake, lifestyle habits, and metabolic syndrome and compared to age-, gender-, and race-matched subjects from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 1999-2000. Additionally, matched subgroups within the patient populations were compared to elicit any differences. RESULTS: As expected, the metabolic syndrome rate was higher in the samples with bipolar disorder (33%) and schizophrenia (47%) compared to matched NHANES controls (17% and 11%, respectively), and not different between the patient groups. Surprisingly, both subjects with bipolar disorder and those with schizophrenia consumed fewer total calories, carbohydrates and fats, as well as more fiber (p < 0.03), compared to NHANES controls. No dietary or activity differences between patientparticipants with and without metabolic syndrome were found. Subjects with schizophrenia had significantly lower total and low-density cholesterol levels (p < 0.0001) compared to NHANES controls. Subjects with bipolar disorder smoked less (p = 0.001), exercised more (p = 0.004), and had lower body mass indexes (p = 0.009) compared to subjects with schizophrenia. CONCLUSIONS: Counter to predictions, few dietary differences could be discerned between schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and NHANES control groups. The subjects with bipolar disorder exhibited healthier behaviors than the patients with schizophrenia. Additional research regarding metabolic syndrome mechanisms, focusing on non-dietary contributions, is needed.
Authors: Patricia M Dubbert; Teresa Carithers; Anne E Sumner; Krista A Barbour; Bobby L Clark; John E Hall; Errol D Crook Journal: Am J Med Sci Date: 2002-09 Impact factor: 2.378
Authors: Jonathan M Meyer; Henry A Nasrallah; Joseph P McEvoy; Donald C Goff; Sonia M Davis; Miranda Chakos; Jayendra K Patel; Richard S E Keefe; T Scott Stroup; Jeffrey A Lieberman Journal: Schizophr Res Date: 2005-08-24 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: Vicki L Ellingrod; Del D Miller; Stephan F Taylor; Jessica Moline; Timothy Holman; Jane Kerr Journal: Schizophr Res Date: 2007-10-31 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: Stephanie A Flowers; Nielson T Baxter; Kristen M Ward; A Zarina Kraal; Melvin G McInnis; Thomas M Schmidt; Vicki L Ellingrod Journal: Pharmacotherapy Date: 2019-02-03 Impact factor: 4.705
Authors: Christine Li; Boris Birmaher; Brian Rooks; Mary Kay Gill; Heather Hower; David A Axelson; Daniel P Dickstein; Tina R Goldstein; Fangzi Liao; Shirley Yen; Jeffrey Hunt; Satish Iyengar; Neal D Ryan; Michael A Strober; Martin B Keller; Benjamin I Goldstein Journal: J Clin Psychiatry Date: 2019-07-30 Impact factor: 4.384
Authors: Christoph U Correll; Marco Solmi; Nicola Veronese; Beatrice Bortolato; Stella Rosson; Paolo Santonastaso; Nita Thapa-Chhetri; Michele Fornaro; Davide Gallicchio; Enrico Collantoni; Giorgio Pigato; Angela Favaro; Francesco Monaco; Cristiano Kohler; Davy Vancampfort; Philip B Ward; Fiona Gaughran; André F Carvalho; Brendon Stubbs Journal: World Psychiatry Date: 2017-06 Impact factor: 49.548
Authors: Jaya L Padmanabhan; Pranav Nanda; Neeraj Tandon; Suraj S Mothi; Nicolas Bolo; Steven McCarroll; Brett A Clementz; Elliot S Gershon; Godfrey D Pearlson; John A Sweeney; Carol A Tamminga; Matcheri S Keshavan Journal: J Psychiatr Res Date: 2016-02-23 Impact factor: 4.791
Authors: Davy Vancampfort; Brendon Stubbs; Alex J Mitchell; Marc De Hert; Martien Wampers; Philip B Ward; Simon Rosenbaum; Christoph U Correll Journal: World Psychiatry Date: 2015-10 Impact factor: 49.548
Authors: Melvin G McInnis; Shervin Assari; Masoud Kamali; Kelly Ryan; Scott A Langenecker; Erika F H Saunders; Kritika Versha; Simon Evans; K Sue O'Shea; Emily Mower Provost; David Marshall; Daniel Forger; Patricia Deldin; Sebastian Zoellner Journal: Int J Epidemiol Date: 2018-02-01 Impact factor: 7.196